Ragnarok Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 I'm a Mayock disciple in that I think it's good for checking boxes. But wont use it to move a guy up a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncofan Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 I think the Combine is really good when used to answer specific Q's, such as: -Is a player really limited athletically? This matters when they've played against weak competition. -Is a player more athletically talented, and not just a beneficiary for scheme? This is the flip side, for guys who put up great numbers with talented teams. -How does a guy look when asked to do different things? This matters in the drills part of the Combine, where a guy may be asked to do something for which there's little tape. I think the danger is when the numbers are used to override film and skill analysis (Dalvin Cook's 3-cone scaring ppl despite really awesome film, and success at an early age). Or they don't factor in context (like Keenan Allen's 4.71 40, coming off PCL surgery, and film which showed that he was clearly playing faster / quicker / twitchier than that). I used to believe teams also overvalued straight line speed or raw strength more than elusiveness/suddenness/explosion & functional strength, but the focus on shuttle / 3-cone / explosiveness indicators and 10 & 20 yard splits shows how far analysis has come along. Not as much of an issue there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 When the combine results mirrors what he showed on the field, that doesn't tell you much. If a guy is fast on film, and he runs fast in shorts don't count it twice. When the combine result does not match what you saw on the field, that gives you a question you need to answer. It may be that the answer to that question is a positive (i.e. it points to how his college coaches didn't maximize his talent with the scheme) and sometimes that answer is a negative, but sometimes it won't really matter. The combine is simply data, nothing more and nothing less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzane Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 (edited) We-e-ellllllll, I may be biased, staunch Jets' fan that I am; but I can't help but root for these "unathletic" guys who test poorly at the Combine- but go on to star in the NFL via their skill, their smarts, their hard work, and, above all their HEART. And yes, I'm thinking of that self-made cerebral master of pass-rush technique: VERNON GHOLSTON!!! I remain convinced that some day- and you read it here first!- The Ghost will notch that elusive first sack! 1. Vernon Gholston Position: Defensive end Draft: 2008, Round 1, No. 6 overall Selected by: New York Jets The lowdown: He came out of Ohio State with all of the measurables that teams seek: size, speed, length, strength. But Gholston was raw and inexperienced. The 6-4, 258-pound physical specimen was impressive at the combine (4.67-second 40, 35½-inch vertical, 37 reps of 225 pounds on the bench), and New York was smitten, burning a top-10 selection on a player who would start just five games and record no sacks over three seasons with the team. Edited February 27, 2020 by bzane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 Team/player interviews and the medical checks can have an influence. Most of this info is not something that gets "known" like the testing #'s do in the various drills. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awsi Dooger Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 I would give benefit of a doubt to a highly rated recruit who underachieved in college but wasn't injury damaged and tests out to verify the athletic ability. Everything tends to drift back to the beginning. Those 4 and 5 star recruits become value when nobody wants them, as this study below indicates. They outperform because they simply have been great all their lives. Then it is briefly camouflaged in college, leading to bargains galore: http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/174883892/predicting-best-nfl-draft-prospects-talent IMO, any team during the combine and draft process that doesn't refer to the recruiting rankings, and also the age of a player, is badly out of touch and basically incompetent. Last thing I want in a top pick is a late blooming overaged stiff who was a lowly rated recruit. Who cares how that guy tests? Sure there are outlier examples. Outliers are for fools. Outliers serve to elevate the rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 (edited) 14 hours ago, Ragnarok said: I'm a Mayock disciple in that I think it's good for checking boxes. But wont use it to move a guy up a lot. This is my thought process as well but unfortunately it will move guys up and some quite a bit. At least it's not useless like Pro Days should be. Edited February 27, 2020 by JTagg7754 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE DUKE Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 21 hours ago, Calvert28 said: Interviews and drug tests are by far the most valuable things about the combine. If you can't pass a drug test when you know the exact date you are taking the drug test, MAAAAAAAAAAAAJOR red flag. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldfishwars Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 15 hours ago, Ragnarok said: I'm a Mayock disciple in that I think it's good for checking boxes. But wont use it to move a guy up a lot. For me it depends on the position he plays (corners need to hit speed check marks for example), everything else is lining it up against the tape. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karnage84 Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 On 2/26/2020 at 9:12 AM, jebrick said: I still remember Deon Sanders commenting at the Combine ( not many years ago) on how the DBs coming out of college did not know how to play the position. Mostly that they were taught just enough to function in a coach's system. DBs and WRs were two groups that would have to learn their positions with their NFL team. WR need to learn to run routes and read defenses. CBs needed technique to make them more effective. Both are drafted as athletes with potential ( CBs more than WR). I also think the 40 is a lot of flash but not showing much as you can get specific training for doing well in that test and it might not reflect your game speed. It is not without merit but much less so in my eyes than the media like to say. This would be an insane amount of work but it would be interesting to see how some of these guys fare in their 40's at the combine vs high school at events like The Opening. How much faster are they in general and how much faster are they when you account for the increased height/weight moving from a senior in HS to a JR/SR in college. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karnage84 Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 17 hours ago, goldfishwars said: Definitely bench reps. I'm only drafting receivers and corners who ca put up 30 reps. Everyone else is off the board. Punters too, they need to do 30 reps and jump 36 inches or I'm giving them hell. I share this philosophy on QB's. If they don't put up 15 reps on the bench, I'm not drafting them. If they're DNP then they're DND (Do Not Draft). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebrick Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 For Bench I do not put a lot into the test other than being pitiful compared to your peers in your group could show a lack of work ethic. I look at Vertical Jump and Broad jump for explosiveness. That is really only for EDGE players. 3 cone drill is the only other test I follow. Mainly for players that need to perform in space ( WR, LB, CB). And it just shows the ability to change direction quickly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.