Jump to content

Free Agency Discussion


candyman93

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, NateDawg said:

Eli Apple is not good. 

to be a sure starter, yeah not good but for a depth player, I would take a chance on him. I would still take him for a potential #2=#4. Sill Young enough that he deserves to take a gamble on. He played better for the Saints once he was designated as the #2/#3 corner. He would be that way in Cleveland if brought in. Browns could do a lot worst for DB depth than him.

Edited by buno67
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, buno67 said:

to be a sure starter, yeah not good but for a depth player, I would take a chance on him. I would still take him for a potential #2=#4. Sill Young enough that he deserves to take a gamble on. He played better for the Saints once he was designated as the #2/#3 corner. He would be that way in Cleveland if brought in. Browns could do a lot worst for DB depth than him.

He’s good enough that the Giants gave up on him as a first round pick on a similar timeline as we gave up on Corey Coleman.

Sure, he can come in and be a camp body and compete for a back up spot. Beyond that, I wouldn’t hold my breath on him getting any further up the depth chart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, NateDawg said:

He’s good enough that the Giants gave up on him as a first round pick on a similar timeline as we gave up on Corey Coleman.

Sure, he can come in and be a camp body and compete for a back up spot. Beyond that, I wouldn’t hold my breath on him getting any further up the depth chart. 

True Giants gave up on him like we gave up Coleman but a big difference is Coleman did nothing else on those new teams. Apple actually played for the Saints and contributed on their defense. He still has potential. Will he ever teach it maybe but I’d still give him a shot. Def be worth a back up corner spot

Edited by buno67
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, buno67 said:

True Giants gave up on him like we gave up Coleman but a big difference is Coleman did nothing else on those new teams. Apple actually played for the Saints and contributed on their defense. He still has potential. Will he ever teach it maybe but I’d still give him a shot. Def be worth a back up corner spot

Maybe, but he's going to command more than 4th-5th CB money. We already have a strong 4 at CB. We don't need to add Apple's salary to the group.

CB1: Ward
CB2: Greedy
NCB: Johnson
DIME: Mitchell
DEPTH: Donovan Olumba
DEPTH: Draft Pick/Tavierre Thomas/Robert Jackson

 

I can all but guarantee you we won't even sniff around at adding Eli Apple. Plus, he's a mental midget. I don't want soft players on this defense. It was the death of our season last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have mixed feelings about clowney. He’s highly overrated. But his impact is larger than just sack numbers so you can look at that. I’ve seen him completely dominate OTs without getting to the qb and he’s great against the run. But Vernon costs us nothing guaranteed and he’s an expired contract. So we can go after someone next year.  Equally as injury prone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, sdrawkcab321 said:

I have mixed feelings about clowney. He’s highly overrated. But his impact is larger than just sack numbers so you can look at that. I’ve seen him completely dominate OTs without getting to the qb and he’s great against the run. But Vernon costs us nothing guaranteed and he’s an expired contract. So we can go after someone next year.  Equally as injury prone. 

I'd be all for giving Clowney a one or two year deal, but he's not a dude who I want to give big money to over 4-5 years.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Kiwibrown said:

Yep, it would cost us better players in the future.

Yeah give him a two year day team option on the third or something. Pay him up front. Put him at LT his best position and just tell him be productive as possible and max out a contract two years from now. I’ve been saying Clowney for a while it makes a ton of sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, sdrawkcab321 said:

ok I’m all in on clowney  

 

The past two seasons has been his best 2 season stretch, so he has hit is prime but injury history is the only scary aspect about him. He is worth the risk thk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we sign Clowney, I’d still keep Vernon. Theoretically all he, Myles, and Clowney should be more likely to stay healthy playing less snaps  and have fresh legs late in games. Also you could probably play Vernon or Garret inside in obvious passing situations.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BrownsDog23 said:

If we sign Clowney, I’d still keep Vernon. Theoretically all he, Myles, and Clowney should be more likely to stay healthy playing less snaps  and have fresh legs late in games. Also you could probably play Vernon or Garret inside in obvious passing situations.

This. Maybe both walk after this season and we get a 3rd and 4th compensatory. We can pay $16 mil to Clowney for a 1yr rental with option to buy/tag & trade. Law of averages said at least one of the two misses some time with injuries and we can afford them both for this season, so...yup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...