Jump to content
jetskid007

2020 NFL Free Agency: Rumors and Reports

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Bobby816 said:

If true. We have to go WR at 11 IMO. Bc that would make it where we didn’t address WR considerably in FA or the 1st or 2nd Round. Can’t keep relying on mid late rounders to be good for a hopeful franchise QB

Or trade back,  honestly that would be the only bright side of this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Bobby816 said:

If true. We have to go WR at 11 IMO. Bc that would make it where we didn’t address WR considerably in FA or the 1st or 2nd Round. Can’t keep relying on mid late rounders to be good for a hopeful franchise QB

I don’t think they would do such a thing at all. If a top 3 OL still fell, I’m pretty sure they’d still go that route. 

And yes, you can still rely on 2nd-4th round WRs in this class. It’s that deep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jetskid007 said:

I don’t think they would do such a thing at all. If a top 3 OL still fell, I’m pretty sure they’d still go that route. 

And yes, you can still rely on 2nd-4th round WRs in this class. It’s that deep.

Well than they can’t like Edoga that much

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine trading for Williams and still signing Conklin in FA

Go WR at 11 and C in the 2nd and all of a sudden the offense is looking juicy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Move say the Giants 3rd for Trent. 

Help Indy jump Oakland and pick up a 4th. 

1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6 + Trent

Sign Glasgow/Looney/McGovern(2 Of the 3) and re-sign Lewis. Draft one of the 4 tackles left. 

Trent-Lewis-Looney/Glasgow/McGovern- Rookie

Overall we would have simply traded Leo for Trent and moved behind two teams who won’t draft Tackles anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

61-tloa2zil._sl1500_.jpg

 

 

lol.

 

Anyway, while I don't like acquiring Trent Williams I hope he is in 1000 percent shape.  18m per season thru 35 years old.  That is a risk.

Edited by JetsandI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Bobby816 said:

Well than they can’t like Edoga that much

They can like Edoga. They can also like the top OL prospects in the past 3-5+ years better. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jetskid007 said:

They can like Edoga. They can also like the top OL prospects in the past 3-5+ years better. 

Like I stated they can’t like him THAT MUCH. If they loved him they wouldn’t see 2 OT spots as needs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Bobby816 said:

Like I stated they can’t like him THAT MUCH. If they loved him they wouldn’t see 2 OT spots as needs. 

Or they are ok with him at guard, or with taking Wirfs and moving him to guard

Edited by rampantjet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not really an Edoga. I still stand by that if Douglas was running the draft last year that we wouldn’t have picked him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, rampantjet said:

Or they are ok with him at guard, or with taking Wirfs and moving him to guard

Edoga isn’t really suited for G. He could be a swing T, but the reports are that we really like him. My point is... we can’t REALLY like him if we would maybe get an OT and still draft a OT at 11. That tells me everything they’ve said is pretty much BS. Which is ok. I just don’t want to hear we really like Edoga anymore from people. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll also say this. I’d rather give Conklin plenty of money than trade assets and still spend big on Trent. At the end of the day I’d be happy with adding either. But for me it makes more sense to overpay Conklin a couple mill per than trade away a valuable pick and still have to spend a good amount of money on Trent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Bobby816 said:

Edoga isn’t really suited for G. He could be a swing T, but the reports are that we really like him. My point is... we can’t REALLY like him if we would maybe get an OT and still draft a OT at 11. That tells me everything they’ve said is pretty much BS. Which is ok. I just don’t want to hear we really like Edoga anymore from people. 

I've read that they like him and think that he could be good at tackle or guard. 

 

4 minutes ago, Bobby816 said:

I’ll also say this. I’d rather give Conklin plenty of money than trade assets and still spend big on Trent. At the end of the day I’d be happy with adding either. But for me it makes more sense to overpay Conklin a couple mill per than trade away a valuable pick and still have to spend a good amount of money on Trent.

I'd rather have Conklin too, but he's a FA so we have no assurances that we'd land him,  where as if we trade for trent he's ours. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×