Jump to content

2020 NFL Free Agency: Rumors and Reports


jetskid007

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Bobby816 said:

If true. We have to go WR at 11 IMO. Bc that would make it where we didn’t address WR considerably in FA or the 1st or 2nd Round. Can’t keep relying on mid late rounders to be good for a hopeful franchise QB

Or trade back,  honestly that would be the only bright side of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bobby816 said:

If true. We have to go WR at 11 IMO. Bc that would make it where we didn’t address WR considerably in FA or the 1st or 2nd Round. Can’t keep relying on mid late rounders to be good for a hopeful franchise QB

I don’t think they would do such a thing at all. If a top 3 OL still fell, I’m pretty sure they’d still go that route. 

And yes, you can still rely on 2nd-4th round WRs in this class. It’s that deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jetskid007 said:

I don’t think they would do such a thing at all. If a top 3 OL still fell, I’m pretty sure they’d still go that route. 

And yes, you can still rely on 2nd-4th round WRs in this class. It’s that deep.

Well than they can’t like Edoga that much

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Move say the Giants 3rd for Trent. 

Help Indy jump Oakland and pick up a 4th. 

1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6 + Trent

Sign Glasgow/Looney/McGovern(2 Of the 3) and re-sign Lewis. Draft one of the 4 tackles left. 

Trent-Lewis-Looney/Glasgow/McGovern- Rookie

Overall we would have simply traded Leo for Trent and moved behind two teams who won’t draft Tackles anyway.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jetskid007 said:

They can like Edoga. They can also like the top OL prospects in the past 3-5+ years better. 

Like I stated they can’t like him THAT MUCH. If they loved him they wouldn’t see 2 OT spots as needs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bobby816 said:

Like I stated they can’t like him THAT MUCH. If they loved him they wouldn’t see 2 OT spots as needs. 

Or they are ok with him at guard, or with taking Wirfs and moving him to guard

Edited by rampantjet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rampantjet said:

Or they are ok with him at guard, or with taking Wirfs and moving him to guard

Edoga isn’t really suited for G. He could be a swing T, but the reports are that we really like him. My point is... we can’t REALLY like him if we would maybe get an OT and still draft a OT at 11. That tells me everything they’ve said is pretty much BS. Which is ok. I just don’t want to hear we really like Edoga anymore from people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll also say this. I’d rather give Conklin plenty of money than trade assets and still spend big on Trent. At the end of the day I’d be happy with adding either. But for me it makes more sense to overpay Conklin a couple mill per than trade away a valuable pick and still have to spend a good amount of money on Trent.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bobby816 said:

Edoga isn’t really suited for G. He could be a swing T, but the reports are that we really like him. My point is... we can’t REALLY like him if we would maybe get an OT and still draft a OT at 11. That tells me everything they’ve said is pretty much BS. Which is ok. I just don’t want to hear we really like Edoga anymore from people. 

I've read that they like him and think that he could be good at tackle or guard. 

 

4 minutes ago, Bobby816 said:

I’ll also say this. I’d rather give Conklin plenty of money than trade assets and still spend big on Trent. At the end of the day I’d be happy with adding either. But for me it makes more sense to overpay Conklin a couple mill per than trade away a valuable pick and still have to spend a good amount of money on Trent.

I'd rather have Conklin too, but he's a FA so we have no assurances that we'd land him,  where as if we trade for trent he's ours. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...