Jump to content

Average Offensive Starter PFF Scores for NFL


MacReady

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Packerraymond said:

"I'm right about Jimmy Graham still, PFF obviously uses blocking way more than receiving and lowers his score. Allen Lazard (an excellent blocking WR) LOOK AT HIS PFF SCORE, HE'S BETTER THAN MOST #2'S!!!"

Our pass catchers are bad. I don't care what PFF says. Adams is elite, then it's a bunch on guys who don't consistently separate.

OL and RBs ? Yeah, very good, top 8 in the league I would say. Offense needs pass catchers.

 

Agree 100% with this. @Outpost31

 

Image result for i concur gif

Edited by Arthur Penske
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, cannondale said:

Are you going to say with a straight face that Adams, Allison, Lazard, Kumerow, and Graham, can hold a candle to Jennings, Nelson, Jones, Cobb, Driver and Finley ? Toss in 2 Pro Bowl guards as well.  If so, that's about as gross as it can get.

Edit: To further illustrate my point, I totally forgot about MVS. Probably because he sucks too.

The talent around Rodgers has not "dwindled down to nothing." 

Your statement was stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Packerraymond said:

Dwindled down to mediocrity.

Similarly nonsensical. The talent around Rodgers has been fine. He's got 5 guys on offense around him that are distinctly above average (Bulaga, Bakhtiari, Linsley, Adams, Jones) and 2 others that are around average (Jenkins, Turner). 

This isn't a mediocre roster on offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

Similarly nonsensical. The talent around Rodgers has been fine. He's got 5 guys on offense around him that are distinctly above average (Bulaga, Bakhtiari, Linsley, Adams, Jones) and 2 others that are around average (Jenkins, Turner). 

This isn't a mediocre roster on offense. 

The next time we want to run a tackle eligible, we should be good to go. That's a relief.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

Similarly nonsensical. The talent around Rodgers has been fine. He's got 5 guys on offense around him that are distinctly above average (Bulaga, Bakhtiari, Linsley, Adams, Jones) and 2 others that are around average (Jenkins, Turner). 

This isn't a mediocre roster on offense. 

He's talking about pass catchers. Running game has nothing to do with Rodgers other than it's impact on the PA pass game. When people say "talent around Rodgers" they mean people he's throwing the football to.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Outpost31 said:

Yeah, I need to eat it with Graham.  He’s bad.

Adams, Lazard, MVS and Allison, thanks to Adams, makes our pass catchers average.  Unless you think what the Steelers, Bills, Dolphins, Jets, Bengals, Jaguars, Colts, Titans, Patriots, Ravens, Raiders, Broncos, Panthers, Redskins, Eagles, Niners, Cardinals (am I past 16 yet) we’re better off at WR 1-3.

Spoiler alert: They weren’t.  
 

Our pass catchers (from 1-4) were better than half the league.  

The bad 1/2. Need better wr to get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

Similarly nonsensical. The talent around Rodgers has been fine. He's got 5 guys on offense around him that are distinctly above average (Bulaga, Bakhtiari, Linsley, Adams, Jones) and 2 others that are around average (Jenkins, Turner). 

This isn't a mediocre roster on offense. 

It is for wr.  Bottom half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Outpost31 said:

Yeah, I need to eat it with Graham.  He’s bad.

Adams, Lazard, MVS and Allison, thanks to Adams, makes our pass catchers average.  Unless you think what the Steelers, Bills, Dolphins, Jets, Bengals, Jaguars, Colts, Titans, Patriots, Ravens, Raiders, Broncos, Panthers, Redskins, Eagles, Niners, Cardinals (am I past 16 yet) we’re better off at WR 1-3.

Spoiler alert: They weren’t.  
 

Our pass catchers (from 1-4) were better than half the league.  

There are three Id swap 1-3, Pitt, Bengals (if AJ Green was hypothetically 100%), Panthers.

That's only because of how much I love Adams. A bunch more I'd swap 2&3 with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, coachbuns said:

The bad 1/2. Need better wr to get better.

Did you just read the teams I listed?  Are you honestly saying that our receiving corps is bottom half of the league?  Name 16 receiving corps better than ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Packerraymond said:

Running game has nothing to do with Rodgers other than it's impact on the PA pass game.

I'm on your side with the talent at pass catcher here, but this line is downplaying Jones value to Rodgers quite a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Packerraymond said:

It's hard because of how good Adams is. If you say name a better 2-5, easily bottom 16.

Yes, but we HAVE ADAMS.  

20 teams have better #2 receivers.  Say 22 teams have better #2 receivers.

Not all 22 of those teams have better #1 receivers.

We are not hurting for talent compared to the rest of the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Outpost31 said:

Yes, but we HAVE ADAMS.  

20 teams have better #2 receivers.  Say 22 teams have better #2 receivers.

Not all 22 of those teams have better #1 receivers.

We are not hurting for talent compared to the rest of the NFL.

It's much easier to stop the #1 guy when your #2 guy is more like a #3

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...