Jump to content

GDT Week 3 - Bengals @ Packers


MNPackfan32

Player of the Game  

38 members have voted

  1. 1. Player of the Game?

    • Rodgers
      12
    • Perry
      1
    • King
      5
    • HaHa Clinton-Dix
      0
    • Davante Adams
      3
    • Is anybody else even healthy?
      17


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, packfanfb said:

Depends on how healthy we are though. If our offense is depleted at WR and tackle, we will stuggle to score over 21-24 points. Could still be enough but it might be a closer game than if we had 21 out of 22 starters out there.

I doubt Bulaga and Bahk miss. One of the live reporters in ATL from the MKE market said that Bahk looked explosive and was laughing and smiling pre-game. He was shocked post game that he was inactive. I think the flu derailed Bulaga last week more than the ankle.

We beat Dallas in Dallas without Jordy. I think we can put it on Cincy at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Packerraymond said:

I doubt Bulaga and Bahk miss. One of the live reporters in ATL from the MKE market said that Bahk looked explosive and was laughing and smiling pre-game. He was shocked post game that he was inactive. I think the flu derailed Bulaga last week more than the ankle.

We beat Dallas in Dallas without Jordy. I think we can put it on Cincy at home.

Presents and interesting question. Who would you rather have? Bulaga and Bakh but no Nelson or Cobb, or vice versa? Id have to go the former.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

Presents and interesting question. Who would you rather have? Bulaga and Bakh but no Nelson or Cobb, or vice versa? Id have to go the former.

Bulaga and Back. We are deeper at WR than tackle and who cares how good your WRs are when you have no time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the Bengals scare me more on paper than they do in terms of watching them play.  They've got a LOT of offensive weapons, but that OL is a mess.  He was sacked 5 times by the Ravens, and on short rest he was sacked another 3 times by the Texans.  IF the Packers can get consistent pressure, I have little doubt that the Packers will win this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, packfanfb said:

Presents and interesting question. Who would you rather have? Bulaga and Bakh but no Nelson or Cobb, or vice versa? Id have to go the former.

Bakh and Bulaga, easily.  I think Rodgers/Bakh/Daniels are the three most important players on this team.  TT gets some grief on his drafts but he nailed it with Bakh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our offense has been putrid. We haven't even scored a touchdown yet this year. Our defense has been fairly good and been keeping the game close (if the offense could do anything). Packers should win fairly easily. Our offensive line is arguably the worst in football right now 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CWood21 said:

Honestly, the Bengals scare me more on paper than they do in terms of watching them play.  They've got a LOT of offensive weapons, but that OL is a mess.  He was sacked 5 times by the Ravens, and on short rest he was sacked another 3 times by the Texans.  IF the Packers can get consistent pressure, I have little doubt that the Packers will win this game.

Getting Brooks back should help. Gonna need Clark and Lowry to step up inside without Daniels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CWood21 said:

Honestly, the Bengals scare me more on paper than they do in terms of watching them play.  They've got a LOT of offensive weapons, but that OL is a mess.  He was sacked 5 times by the Ravens, and on short rest he was sacked another 3 times by the Texans.  IF the Packers can get consistent pressure, I have little doubt that the Packers will win this game.

Yeah I don't understand them. That roster should be at least competing for a playoff spot, but watching their All 22's against the Ravens (granted what looks to be a very good defense) they look worse then the Jets. Cannot get anything going on offense. Defense plays good in spots but the Offense is just anemic. The tape honesty looks like the worst team in the league. Gotta think they get something going sometime

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, SpeightTheVillain said:

Yeah I don't understand them. That roster should be at least competing for a playoff spot, but watching their All 22's against the Ravens (granted what looks to be a very good defense) they look worse then the Jets. Cannot get anything going on offense. Defense plays good in spots but the Offense is just anemic. The tape honesty looks like the worst team in the league. Gotta think they get something going sometime

To me, their OL is a mess.  I mean, without looking it up the only OL I could think of is Jake Fisher and Obguheudei or whatever his name is.  They're not a great offensive team right now, but they just fired their OC so they're probably going to be playing with some emotion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...