Jump to content

The NOT Too Early 2018 NFL Draft Thread


turtle28

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, ripsean21 said:

Barkley or Chubbare the only talents we could justify trading up for!!!!

Eh, Chubb is good, but is he that much better than what we currently have? That’s the question. It is true if you draft him though that you don’t need to re-sign Smith so you’re saving $ on a 2nd contract for Smith as Mknight says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, turtle28 said:

Eh, Chubb is good, but is he that much better than what we currently have? That’s the question. It is true if you draft him though that you don’t need to re-sign Smith so you’re saving $ on a 2nd contract for Smith as Mknight says.

I think he’s a better football player the Myles Garrett. Nowhere near as athletic but he is a really really good football player

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MKnight82 said:

So Marcus Davenport is better than Chubb?  Word lets draft him.

That's their projection, though they are both pretty close in projection. The projection is somewhat down on Chubb as a top 5 prospect though.

Interestingly enough: https://www.footballoutsiders.com/index.php?q=stat-analysis/2015/sackseer-2015

Quote

Preston Smith, Mississippi State

SackSEER Projection: 22.3 Sacks through Year 5
SackSEER Rating: 75.2%

Preston Smith only had seven sacks through his first three years of college football, then nine sacks as a senior. These numbers are well below average for a top-tier edge rusher prospect, but Smith salvaged his projection somewhat with a good pass defensed rate, as he managed to intercept two passes and bat down seven others.

http://www.nfl.com/player/prestonsmith/2552276/careerstats

20.5 through 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, MKnight82 said:

So Marcus Davenport is better than Chubb?  Word lets draft him.

Not sure how they can make a projection like that. Its absolutely ludicrous at how analytical people are trying to be. Maybe there is a reason they are called the Outsiders?

I believe that Harold Landry is better than Davenport but neither are really better than Chubb. 

anigif_enhanced-buzz-31768-1405685443-14.gif?downsize=715:*&output-format=auto&output-quality=auto

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mike23md said:

Not sure how they can make a projection like that. Its absolutely ludicrous at how analytical people are trying to be. Maybe there is a reason they are called the Outsiders?

I believe that Harold Landry is better than Davenport but neither are really better than Chubb. 

anigif_enhanced-buzz-31768-1405685443-14.gif?downsize=715:*&output-format=auto&output-quality=auto

Nice Nicholson sig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...