RaidersAreOne 6,262 Posted March 19 (edited) Update: Edited March 19 by RaidersAreOne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JaguarCrazy2832 2,191 Posted March 19 Well we were all wondering how they could afford to keep everyone... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MKnight82 6,258 Posted March 19 Gonna be the bucs. 5 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KhanYouDigIt 1,513 Posted March 19 Trade Cooks next. Blow it up if you ask me. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JonStark 965 Posted March 19 Between the (possible) terrible logo and this, my offseason is looking like a big old pile of poop. I just dont understand the need to get rid of him. They could've restructured Goff and not given Floyd a possible $13 mil and been fine. Give Gurley a full workload this year and either he succeeds and you're fine, or he fails and you can get out of his contract easier next year. 5 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Texansfan713 1,216 Posted March 19 Just now, KhanYouDigIt said: Trade Cooks next. Blow it up if you ask me. imagine if they did and got ANOTHER first rounder for him. me @ET80and the other Texans fans would lose it. 6 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.Buzz 3,052 Posted March 19 Just now, Texansfan713 said: imagine if they did and got ANOTHER first rounder for him. me @ET80and the other Texans fans would lose it. They aren't getting a first for Cooks. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KhanYouDigIt 1,513 Posted March 19 1 minute ago, Texansfan713 said: imagine if they did and got ANOTHER first rounder for him. me @ET80and the other Texans fans would lose it. Thinking a 4th. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Texansfan713 1,216 Posted March 19 1 minute ago, .Buzz said: They aren't getting a first for Cooks. I know they aren't but I would love for it to happen just for the lulz. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Danger 5,665 Posted March 19 Wouldn't give more than a 4th for Cooks with that Contract. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BleedTheClock 4,850 Posted March 19 6 minutes ago, .Buzz said: They aren't getting a first for Cooks. What if they trade him to Houston? 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaidersAreOne 6,262 Posted March 19 1 minute ago, BleedTheClock said: What if they trade him to Houston? Likely Watson going back. 5 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jrry32 8,548 Posted March 19 Trade has to happen before the roster bonus. Otherwise, it does nothing for us. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jrry32 8,548 Posted March 19 8 minutes ago, KhanYouDigIt said: Thinking a 4th. Trading Cooks costs us money. We're not going to give him away. That's especially true if we've already paid his roster bonus. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
