m haynes Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 1 minute ago, THE DUKE said: Haha, technically yes, but The Duke was my high school nickname which in turn became my online name back in the late 90's. I go with Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones is one of my favorite movie characters of all time and I've been rocking this avatar over multiple sites for over 20 years now. Pretty funny. I looked up Harrison Ford and someone wrote a book about him named Brad Duke. I use Mike Haynes Patriots, my favorite player, ya about 40 years. When did the internet start !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChazStandard Posted March 26, 2020 Share Posted March 26, 2020 On 3/23/2020 at 5:22 PM, The LBC said: Since Matt Cassel (who was a 7th round pick) was really the only guy Belichick spent an actual draft pick on that didn't meet a certain benchmark minimum of Bill Parcells' requirements for a quarterback prospect (e.g. a senior, started at least 3 years, graduated, started 30 games, won 23 games, 2:1 TD to INT ratio, at least a 60% comp). The only 7/7's in that regard in this class are Hurts, Herbert, and I believe Nathan Stanley. The top names among the 5/7's are Fromm, Burrow, and Love. If BB is drafting a QB, I strongly doubt he dips below that 5/7 benchmark. For reference, Jimmy G was a 7/7 I believe. Brissett was a 5 or 6/7 (narrowly missed on completion % by <1% on his college career stats; I'm too lazy to go look to see how many wins NC State had under him). Stidham was a 5/7 (didn't meet being a senior or graduating). Kevin O'Connell is really the one who stands out as not meeting the criteria. Trevor Lawrence gonna be the 2nd 5/7 on that list Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elky Posted March 26, 2020 Share Posted March 26, 2020 Fatal four way Hell in a Cell to determine who becomes the starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drained Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 On 3/25/2020 at 2:19 PM, m haynes said: Gee You hit the Trifecta with this comment. Stidham terrible and you know that how. Next you promote two QB from Vince's league. Lastly, you know the Pats are going heavy on the run. Yikes look at Stidham, he has literally nothing appealing, bad at reading, no arm strength and his accuracy pretty bad too. I'll watch it get proven tho bookmarked this page Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soko Posted March 29, 2020 Share Posted March 29, 2020 On 3/23/2020 at 6:22 PM, BucsDraftGeek47 said: Pat's team has 7-9 best case scenario written all over it On 3/24/2020 at 7:39 AM, BucsDraftGeek47 said: they are alot closer to be picking #1 than to being a 10 win team IMO Bengals went 2-14 this year, so at 7-9 they actually are closer to a 10 win team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucsDraftGeek47 Posted March 29, 2020 Share Posted March 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Yin-Yang said: Bengals went 2-14 this year, so at 7-9 they actually are closer to a 10 win team. Notice i said "best case" but yea i dont see them getting the #1 pick probably top 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nex_Gen Posted March 29, 2020 Share Posted March 29, 2020 How did a Brian Hoyer news thread get to six pages? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m haynes Posted March 29, 2020 Share Posted March 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, Nex_Gen said: How did a Brian Hoyer news thread get to six pages? Corona 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.