Jump to content

JLA Mafia Game Thread DAY 4


Blue

Recommended Posts

Gonna stop where I'm at, lots of games with incomplete (I) data 

 

office

4

CYOCM

2

Wrestlemania

2

Vigilantes

1 (I)

FF

2 (I)

Nice Cage

2

Deathnote

4

MTG

1

Gophers Wolrd

3

Hot Fuzz

2 (I)

Meme

1 (I)

Domes Saloon

2 (I)

Santa Went Crazy

5

Pokemon

1

WW3

1 (I)

Horror Movie

2

Final Fantasy

3

Pirate

2 (I)

It

3

Plain

1 (1)

Back to School

3

Skyrim

3 (I)

Star Treak 9

4

Star Trek

4

Aegon

3

Marvel

5

Overwatch 2.0

1

CM

3 (I)

V

2 (I)

Always Sunny

1 (I)

Breaking Bad

5

Swags mind

4

Casino

3 (I)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vote Count

josh - 4 - Touch, KSJ, Dome

Counselor - 1 - Forge

Mwil - 3 - Matts, Orca, Daboyle

Swag - 1 - bcb

Ragnarok - 2 - Xmad, amac

Xmad - 4 - Squire, Mwil, Swag, biggio

DingoLadd - 1 - Whicker

KSJ - 1 - JoshstraDaymus

Pickle Rick - 1 - Malfatron

Daboyle - 1 - Counselor

With 23 alive and 23 voting, it's 12 to lynch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MWil23 said:

source.gif

The third vote?

 

I see me seeing XMad voting for Superman as cleared Town despite clear evidence to the contrary while contradicting himself that it doesn’t fit the flavor of the theme (Superman as scum)

Except I was jumping back and forth last night, reading up, and minutes or seconds behind the votes on him.

Posts conclusion first.

Posts supporting rationale second and third.

Cherry picking information to fit your narrative is always a good time.

1. Which info was cherry picked to fit my narrative?

2. The conclusion of you are scum lead to the application of said conclusion to develop a read/theory on who would be scum with you based on the information shown in the post as well

3. Which parts were a contradiction for Xmad?

4 hours ago, MWil23 said:

Coming to the conclusion first and then cherry picking information to support that narrative is a comprehensible case, piggybacking off of Matts statement that the "third vote is always scum"?

LOL

What I'm saying isnt what Matts said. You really are pushing hard complaining about cherry picked info, but you havent pointed out the info you think was cherry picked or what other info should be included

4 hours ago, SwAg said:

Hey man, I didn't say it was great, but that's not really the case.  I knew that would be the weak point of the argument, but Orca already addressed it.  The argument was never that matts made a decent point about the third vote.  Matts point was stupid, which should be no surprise.  Orca's argument was that you attempted to frame the narrative related to that afterward, and seemed to take actions to make light of matts' statement because matts was right for a dumb a reason.

These words are better than mine lol

4 hours ago, MWil23 said:

And what I'm saying is this:

I don't take issue with his argument about me attempting to frame the narrative to Matts being right for the wrong reason (except that he's wrong). What I take issue with is a few things that are lost in translation here:

*The timeframe of those votes are so clustered together that my vote came down seconds/minutes after those other two based upon the timeframe of me reading, going back, searching for gifs/Tony Start quotes, etc.

*I pointed out a clear inconsistency with the VC from the host. I have a threefold issue with it because it:

1. As a host, I know how frustrated and monotonous VC's are.

2. I saw it, it needed correcting

3. It directly involves me. If I say nothing, then the Orca narrative reads "Herp, Derp, MWil didn't want to point it out a second time guys!!! He's hiding it guys!!!!"

A lot here 

1. If you dont take issue with the arguement about framing the narrative, why are you complaining about i cherry picked info, in order to attempt to discredit the read I have put forward

2. Your issue with the vote count thing is telling. If I was cherry picking info, wouldnt I have left that out

3. Why do you take issue with the vote count fix being in there? If I told you it was there to show the comprehensive totality of posts that led to my read, so you cant say I cherry picked info...what would you say then? How does that change your above complaint about cherry picking info?

4. The timeframes of it all is not neccesarily a factor. As long as you saw the votes even for a second it results in the same thing 

 

3 hours ago, MWil23 said:

I also think it's funny that Squire and Whicker pointed it out immediately, Orca was there (P. 24 for Squire and P. 25 for Whicker), says nothing (despite two posts on P. 25), and then waits 13 pages to say "Did you see what MWil did there?" as though he went back and reread things.

Wow, so instead of sticking to the issue at hand, that you agreed was a fair argument, you now want to discredit the read due to when I posted it. 

So you use timing as an excuse for why your 3rd votes went down the way you say they did, but want to discredit the subsequent read by me later, due to timing 

You point out my posts on page 25, but skip my post on page 26 voting you in V style. This also brings back the point I made in my breakdown about that specific post. You played off my vote as being because you hadnt done your list, instead of maybe I had an actual reason for the vote. When you replied to my big post, you never took issue with this

1 hour ago, Matts4313 said:

 

 

 

lol. The only two things swags has been capable of saying this game:

1. Rags could possibly not be town all game (or sarcasting version)

2. People are stupid/dumb/idiots/etc

 

Is this the level of play we should expect today?

He did semi compliment me, which is very sketchy lol

1 hour ago, MWil23 said:

I’m insinuating, not accusing, while giving you the benefit of the doubt for running something miniature here. 

Squire jumped me immediately for the “follow” quote (real Tony Stark quote), Whicker jumped on it as well to go along with the second time I was the third vote, you and Orca and Counselor were all there to see it, and yet hours later Orca “did you see what MWil did” to justify his early vote on me.

You acknowledging Orca stands out in general. Counselor jumping on raised an eyebrow. Orca feigning that idea being original to himself when clearly 2-3 other people pointed it out immediately is outright scummy at worst and absurd at best.

So you still want to pound timing after using it as an excuse for yourself. And again skipping my vote on you 

I never proclaimed anything was original to me. I tried to encompass all posts that went into this. Now again you are trying a different means to discredit/demean what I have put forth. 

I acknowledged the other people, but it seems you are not grasping the core concept now after shown above you say it is a fair argument

Do you understand what read I have vs what read/reason others had?

Mwil wants to complain about contradiction with Xmad, but then does explicit contradiction in his posts 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MWil23 said:

Cabin fever is in full swing here. 3 kids under school age, my wife and I trying to each work from home, no real end in sight, my kids aren’t sleeping, and I’m super close to snapping at everyone for no real reason. I’ve already had to apologize to my kids and wife. 

I’m the exact opposite. I love this isolation and am seriously worried about my motivation to go back to work after this is over. If only I wasn’t spending $25 a meal getting it delivered every time 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Dome said:

I meant that I’m acting the same way that you’re supposedly suspicious of 

For Daboyle the last time he did this he was scum in Wrestlemafia 2.

22 minutes ago, squire12 said:

Exactly what?   did you not read the rules?

Exactly in that 1/3 of the way through day is 4 votes. The day doesn’t end until we get to twelve. Thus 4 votes out of 12 votes reduced to 1/3.

21 minutes ago, Dome said:

Lmao 

See above

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Dome said:
44 minutes ago, MWil23 said:

Daboyle seems content to post Stan Lee gifs and lazily follow a lynch train without rationale besides “for the tie”.

Isn’t that kind of what I’m doing too?

same.

and also, im ready to start playing now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MWil23 said:

Exactly in that 1/3 of the way through day is 4 votes. The day doesn’t end until we get to twelve. Thus 4 votes out of 12 votes reduced to 1/3.

That doesn’t mean we’re 1/3rd of the way through the day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malfatron said:

same.

and also, im ready to start playing now

Your voting is similar to last game unless I miscounted, so not “same”.

1 minute ago, Dome said:

That doesn’t mean we’re 1/3rd of the way through the day. 

You are being willfully obtuse right now. I’m not sure whether to laugh or get angry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...