Pickle Rick Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 2 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: Feeding my face Watchya eating buttercup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 1 minute ago, Whicker said: I stand by that bottom statement. I specified with the above. I felt as though that was obvious, but perhaps I didn't communicate it as effectively as I hoped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 2 minutes ago, Pickle Rick said: 7. @MWil23 8. @squire12 9. @Malfatron 10. @JoshstraDaymus 11. @amac 12. @SwAg 13. @theuntouchable 14. @Matts4313 15. @Counselor @MWil23 The main trains right now are Mwil Josh Swole Amac That's actual 3 of the 4 main trains being from this group Where does week 2 of 3 come in? 5 minutes ago, Pickle Rick said: Week 2 of the 3 main trains are in that group lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 Just now, MWil23 said: I stand by that bottom statement. I specified with the above. I felt as though that was obvious, but perhaps I didn't communicate it as effectively as I hoped. I still don’t understand your perspective tbqh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 8 minutes ago, MWil23 said: Whicker meltdown in 3...2...1... It’s already happened my friend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 7 minutes ago, Pickle Rick said: Week 2 of the 3 main trains are in that group lol ****. I can't type on this tablet. To slow and clunky *Well 2 of the 3 main trains are in that group 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 5 minutes ago, Pickle Rick said: Watchya eating buttercup? Spaghetti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 1 minute ago, Whicker said: It’s already happened my friend I'm giving you a gun tonight just bc I wanna see what you will do with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 Just now, theuntouchable said: Spaghetti Pass. I'd rather eat lamb fries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 1 minute ago, Whicker said: I still don’t understand your perspective tbqh I won't monopolize any more of your time, but if you took the "Random" aspect of all 23 of us, the breakdown could be something like 16-5-1-1 or 17-5-1 or 17-6 (something like that), giving you roughly a 33% chance of hitting on random. That's if EVERYONE got a vote. Now, if you took the "random" odds of, say, still 33% chance of hitting, but you only put up your 3-4 biggest scum reads, with no others, you'd have 33% and a higher likelihood of having a few/many competent Town players to then PUSH that number higher than 33%. Even if you get a mislynch, you then at least have more information, vote trends, and force a group of people (scum) to choose sides. That's my basic probability/randomness meets meta synopsis. Does that make sense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 4 minutes ago, Whicker said: It’s already happened my friend Still love ya buddy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 1 minute ago, MWil23 said: I won't monopolize any more of your time, but if you took the "Random" aspect of all 23 of us, the breakdown could be something like 16-5-1-1 or 17-5-1 or 17-6 (something like that), giving you roughly a 33% chance of hitting on random. That's if EVERYONE got a vote. Now, if you took the "random" odds of, say, still 33% chance of hitting, but you only put up your 3-4 biggest scum reads, with no others, you'd have 33% and a higher likelihood of having a few/many competent Town players to then PUSH that number higher than 33%. Even if you get a mislynch, you then at least have more information, vote trends, and force a group of people (scum) to choose sides. That's my basic probability/randomness meets meta synopsis. Does that make sense? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 I don't like who is voting with me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 25 minutes ago, Pickle Rick said: Where @SwAg and @theuntouchable? I am right here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 3 minutes ago, MWil23 said: I won't monopolize any more of your time, but if you took the "Random" aspect of all 23 of us, the breakdown could be something like 16-5-1-1 or 17-5-1 or 17-6 (something like that), giving you roughly a 33% chance of hitting on random. That's if EVERYONE got a vote. Now, if you took the "random" odds of, say, still 33% chance of hitting, but you only put up your 3-4 biggest scum reads, with no others, you'd have 33% and a higher likelihood of having a few/many competent Town players to then PUSH that number higher than 33%. Even if you get a mislynch, you then at least have more information, vote trends, and force a group of people (scum) to choose sides. That's my basic probability/randomness meets meta synopsis. Does that make sense? I’m just gonna say yes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts