.Buzz Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 http://www.breakingnews247.net/59c41d33013be/trade-talks-surface-with-jags-and-pats.html Not sure if this source is legit. Just an interesting discussion topic that may or may not be true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted September 21, 2017 Author Share Posted September 21, 2017 Id be all for trying to grab Jimmy but Im interested to see the price for him. Itd make some sense that Blake would be interesting for them as I think some coaches still value him and theyd need a backup to Brady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinderFournette Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 8 minutes ago, .Buzz said: Id be all for trying to grab Jimmy but Im interested to see the price for him. Itd make some sense that Blake would be interesting for them as I think some coaches still value him and theyd need a backup to Brady. If its more then a 2nd and Blake hard. Pass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Definitely curious of the cost. Loved him coming out of college. Just wish all his tools were healthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrenaline_Flux Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 14 hours ago, LinderFournette said: If its more then a 2nd and Blake hard. Pass I can virtually guarantee the price would be higher than that. 1 hour ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said: Definitely curious of the cost. Loved him coming out of college. Just wish all his tools were healthy I think that is phrasing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinderFournette Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 59 minutes ago, Adrenaline_Flux said: I can virtually guarantee the price would be higher than that. I think that is phrasing. Yes but why should we trade in all likely hood a top 10 pick for him when hes more unproven then matt cassell was especially since hes set to be a fa at the end of the year. If you trade for him your looking at likely having to franchise tag him and then you still habe to work out deals with arob and telvin and somehow find more money to get some upgrades in fa. I know we have some guys we could cut like parnell, ivory, gipson but we would still need to kinda replace them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrenaline_Flux Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 27 minutes ago, LinderFournette said: Yes but why should we trade in all likely hood a top 10 pick for him when hes more unproven then matt cassell was especially since hes set to be a fa at the end of the year. If you trade for him your looking at likely having to franchise tag him and then you still habe to work out deals with arob and telvin and somehow find more money to get some upgrades in fa. I know we have some guys we could cut like parnell, ivory, gipson but we would still need to kinda replace them. I am guessing that the idea in trading a lot of capital for a QB during the season would be to try to avoid earning a top 10 draft selection, but who knows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinderFournette Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 6 minutes ago, Adrenaline_Flux said: I am guessing that the idea in trading a lot of capital for a QB during the season would be to try to avoid earning a top 10 draft selection, but who knows? Yes but if u look at the history of qb trades even right before the season its not good and more often then not the team receiving the qb doesnt break the top 10. You want a great solution to the jags being bad. Clear the all the staff. Get a better gm amd hire Jim Bob Cooter to be our new hc because its a good trend to be a part of. I also seem to find this rumor false. Not 1 other site that i can tell has picked this up so thats pretty telling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crickett Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Quick reminder: You would be trading for Jimmy Garrapolo mid season with limited time to replace and put him behind a sub par offensive line with your top receiver out for the year. And then you would need to re-sign him to a big money contract or franchise him. Currently your receiver corps consists of Allen Hurns (whom there were rumors you were looking to trade a few weeks ago), an injury prone Marquise Lee, Arrelious Benn and the recently acquired Jaelen Strong. Not exactly an elite group. So I ask, is this really the best idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinderFournette Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 12 minutes ago, Crickett said: Quick reminder: You would be trading for Jimmy Garrapolo mid season with limited time to replace and put him behind a sub par offensive line with your top receiver out for the year. And then you would need to re-sign him to a big money contract or franchise him. Currently your receiver corps consists of Allen Hurns (whom there were rumors you were looking to trade a few weeks ago), an injury prone Marquise Lee, Arrelious Benn and the recently acquired Jaelen Strong. Not exactly an elite group. So I ask, is this really the best idea? As i said it wouldnt be a tertible idea but you still gotta extend/tag him and i wouldnt give up that much for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 If he is a FA then why not just go get him this offseason? I guess we aren't guaranteed but there arent a ton of places willing to pay him alot and give him a chance to start, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted September 22, 2017 Author Share Posted September 22, 2017 1 minute ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said: If he is a FA then why not just go get him this offseason? I guess we aren't guaranteed but there arent a ton of places willing to pay him alot and give him a chance to start, right? Patriots arent going to let him just walk I dont think. If they do that then not moving him this past offseason looks even wierder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugboat Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Probably. I can smell the desperation from here. I'd really rather they not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 2 hours ago, .Buzz said: Patriots arent going to let him just walk I dont think. If they do that then not moving him this past offseason looks even wierder. They will get a comp pick for him. Unless they really think he is the future but if Brady is playing another 3-4 years idk if they can afford to pay Jimmy G remotely close to his market value Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinderFournette Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 14 minutes ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said: They will get a comp pick for him. Unless they really think he is the future but if Brady is playing another 3-4 years idk if they can afford to pay Jimmy G remotely close to his market value yes but Maybe they let brady go. i think they are gonna tag jimmy this year atleast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.