Lionized Posted April 5, 2020 Share Posted April 5, 2020 Vote for Dahl is still yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 Yeah, I haven't heard enough against the Dahl trade to hold things up. With our other young depth at the position, I think it's time to find Dahl a new opportunity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 Joe Dahl is now a member of the Panthers. I think it's a move that makes a lot of sense, and gives us another depth piece. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized Posted April 5, 2020 Share Posted April 5, 2020 3 minutes ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said: Joe Dahl is now a member of the Panthers. I think it's a move that makes a lot of sense, and gives us another depth piece. Bravo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 Our remaining draft picks (and TVC value): Pick #67 (255) Pick #85 (165) Pick #109 (76) Pick #112 (70) Pick #149 (30.6) Pick #183 (17) Pick #185 (16.2) Pick #236 (1) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigC421/ Posted April 5, 2020 Share Posted April 5, 2020 (edited) Be interesting to see everyone’s post FFMD mock draft using the results a guide. A) who would you have taken at the picks we ended up with B) Who would you take with our original picks if board fell this way Edited April 5, 2020 by BigC421/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, BigC421/ said: Be interesting to see everyone’s post FFMD mock draft using the results a guide. A) who would you have taken at the picks we ended up with B) Who would you take with our original picks if board fell this way Love the idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 Judon was traded elsewhere, so we keep pick #85. I'm not upset. It would've been a lot of money at the DE position, but also would've been an upgrade. There's a lot of value in the 3rd round this year. We'll be in good shape. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mountainpd Posted April 5, 2020 Share Posted April 5, 2020 Harris and Charlton are available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 3 minutes ago, mountainpd said: Harris and Charlton are available. I do think we have some interest here, although I'm not sure how much we value them. Charles Harris Drafted in the 1st round (pick 22) in the 2017 NFL Draft. He's 25 years old, stands at 6'3", weighs 260 lbs, ran a 4.82 40 yard dash and repped 21 on the bench. After three years in the league, Harris has played in 41 games (8 starts) and has a total of 3.5 sacks, 2 PDs, 0 FFs and 0 TDs. The report on him is that he has been abysmal: he has one move, and is quickly removed from the play once that move is stymied. Not a very promising player. Then... we've got Mr. Tacos. I think we're somewhat familiar with Mr. Tacos. Also underperformed during his time in the NFL so far. Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized Posted April 5, 2020 Share Posted April 5, 2020 3 minutes ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said: I do think we have some interest here, although I'm not sure how much we value them. Charles Harris Drafted in the 1st round (pick 22) in the 2017 NFL Draft. He's 25 years old, stands at 6'3", weighs 260 lbs, ran a 4.82 40 yard dash and repped 21 on the bench. After three years in the league, Harris has played in 41 games (8 starts) and has a total of 3.5 sacks, 2 PDs, 0 FFs and 0 TDs. The report on him is that he has been abysmal: he has one move, and is quickly removed from the play once that move is stymied. Not a very promising player. Then... we've got Mr. Tacos. I think we're somewhat familiar with Mr. Tacos. Also underperformed during his time in the NFL so far. Thoughts? Would move one of our 6th for taco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 Gentlemen: is there a point where we start to seriously consider making a move for 95? I mean... seriously? Slight risk, huge reward (it would seem). Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 We could possibly consider #67, packaged with #109 and #112, to make a move for him, and would still have #85, a 5th, 2 6ths and a 7th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized Posted April 5, 2020 Share Posted April 5, 2020 12 minutes ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said: We could possibly consider #67, packaged with #109 and #112, to make a move for him, and would still have #85, a 5th, 2 6ths and a 7th. Is there any way to get an updated prospect list. It’s become difficult to look at prospect # vs selected players. It’s just difficult jumping around on my phone. That aside, it’s hard to argue getting another 1st round talent. I think it’s a good idea. However would like to get an idea of what window of players could be available here at 67. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 5, 2020 Author Share Posted April 5, 2020 @Sllim Pickens @Karnage84 @LionArkie @davisblack @Lionized @BigC421/ @Louis Friend @Bishop86 Alright guys. I think we have an opportunity here. I'd love some feedback. I feel like we're in a position to make a(nother) huge splash, as a prospect like 95 is still on the board. Sure, he has some rawness to him, but this might be the perfect scenario, considering the positional depth on our team. There's a team looking to trade down from #49. If we were to move #67, #109 and #112, the value is almost exact. We would still have #85 to draft a player at 13's position, with two early 5th round picks (which I'll explain later how those work, if you aren't sure). It's no secret that I have concerns at 95's position, and being able to walk away with Okudah, Kinlaw and 95, with a 3rd round pick in our pockets, would be phenomenal. Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.