Jump to content

FFMD 2020 - Cleveland Browns War Room


FGK

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, freakygeniuskid said:

I think Miami is going to take a WR? Shocker, but that sounds like where they are leaning. That gets us to NYG at #7 who are definitely gonna take an OT. What would we give up to get to #7?

 

Just now, MWil23 said:

I wouldn't trade with Detroit. No way that they go OT when they have Taylor Decker already and are in "win now" mode with Patricia and company. They have to take BPA position player or go for a haul.

As for Wills, I'd like either him or Thomas, but I'd settle for Wirfs. It may be better to make a preemptive deal with #7/#8 to ensure we get our #1 OT. Detroit HAS to go BPA position player, then San Diego likely gets Herbert. We are looking at #7-#9 being critical picks for us, so moving into the #8 spot makes the most sense to me if we are going to move up, thus securing one of Wills and Thomas.

I'd try to slide into the #8 spot. Let them take Wills, we'll take Thomas. Thomas is a true LT anyway with a high floor and has better potential down the road for us. He can be our Day 1 LT, and with our running game/PA pass attack, his ability to transition from a gap to zone scheme I'm not as concerned about. I think he's a solid NFL starter with higher upside. I think the dropoff from 2-3 is more significant personally than from 1-2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MWil23 said:

I'd try to slide into the #8 spot. Let them take Wills, we'll take Thomas. Thomas is a true LT anyway with a high floor and has better potential down the road for us. He can be our Day 1 LT, and with our running game/PA pass attack, his ability to transition from a gap to zone scheme I'm not as concerned about. I think he's a solid NFL starter with higher upside. I think the dropoff from 2-3 is more significant personally than from 1-2.

Personally I'm not part of the Becton hate I see going around. I don't see how he's much riskier than anybody else in the top 4 and has elite upside the same as the rest. I'm starting to get the reasons for the Wirfs/Guard questions, but I still like him as well, just not as much without a one year stop gap at LT to give him an adjustment period.

I'll look into moving up. With it moving so fast it's hard to have time to talk through trades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, freakygeniuskid said:

Personally I'm not part of the Becton hate I see going around. I don't see how he's much riskier than anybody else in the top 4 and has elite upside the same as the rest.

...name the last 370 pound OT who has been dominant, especially with an analytics driven F.O. and scheme that has utilized, if anything, undersized OL. That's my thought.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MWil23 said:

...name the last 370 pound OT who has been dominant, especially with an analytics driven F.O. and scheme that has utilized, if anything, undersized OL. That's my thought.

Yeah, I get that. But I doubt he rolls 370 during the season, I'd guess that would be more like 340. And special guys are special, it happens sometimes. He'd be my #3 in this group with our current situation, but I think he's still a worthwhile pick around #10.

Giants are talking about either going Wirfs or Edge right now, which would be nice for us.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, freakygeniuskid said:

Yeah, I get that. But I doubt he rolls 370 during the season, I'd guess that would be more like 340. And special guys are special, it happens sometimes. He'd be my #3 in this group with our current situation, but I think he's still a worthwhile pick around #10.

I personally am not a believer that a guy is going to come in and play under his weight at the combine, his most important testing/interview/body analysis and composition check in his entire career, but perhaps you are right.

1 minute ago, freakygeniuskid said:

Giants are talking about either going Wirfs or Edge right now, which would be nice for us.

That would be great for us. If that's the case, I'd be very tempted to stay put, albeit Arizona will likely steal Wills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Browns have agreed to trade: Pick #10, Pick #115

To the AZ Cardinals for: Pick #8

Personally I'm okay with whichever of the top 4 OT's we walk out of the draft with. But I can tell that more and more guys on the forum are identifying Wills/Thomas as their clear top targets. So I wanted to honor that by making sure we got one of the two, even though it means I can't dream on Becton or Wirfs' crazy athletic upside.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, freakygeniuskid said:

Browns have agreed to trade: Pick #10, Pick #115

To the AZ Cardinals for: Pick #8

Phenomenal. 

Quote

Personally I'm okay with whichever of the top 4 OT's we walk out of the draft with. But I can tell that more and more guys on the forum are identifying Wills/Thomas as their clear top targets. So I wanted to honor that by making sure we got one of the two, even though it means I can't dream on Becton or Wirfs' crazy athletic upside.

I'm no expert, but Becton just doesn't look very good to me on tape. His top-10 talk reminds me of Clowney #1 buzz, when we just keep seeing that one play where he drove right through the line.

We keep seeing pass it Becton ragdolling linebacker-sized dudes. I'm just not impressed. I see a third round player with top-10 athleticism.

That's where my hate comes from.

Edited by NudeTayne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we get Malik Hooker for our first third and a third next year perhaps? He needs a contract soon and has had injuries.

Or straight-up for Njoku worth looking at? We'd save the two big TE contracts problem that way 🤔.

Edited by NudeTayne
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NudeTayne said:

Can we get Malik Hooker for our first third and a third next year perhaps? He needs a contract soon and has had injuries.

Or straight-up for Njoku worth looking at? We'd save the two big TE contracts problem that way 🤔.

That's a good idea to look into the price tag on Hooker. I'll do that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, freakygeniuskid said:

That's a good idea to look into the price tag on Hooker. I'll do that.

Also, in general, the more picks the better. If someone wants to throw us a 4th rounder to move down six spots in the second round, I take that every time. Shoot, I think we could still be grabbing quality, especially WR/RB late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, there's one GM/team in every mock that decides to eff over their own team's future so they can have more fun by trading away all their future picks.

This year's winner goes to the Panthers, who traded away their first and second round picks next year to draft..... Xavier McKinney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...