Jump to content

FFMD II ‘20 - Pittsburgh Steelers Front Office.


jebrick

Recommended Posts

Ok guys, I’ve been pounding the phones and I’ve discovered a trade partner for Samuels/Duck

A) Jaylen and #233 for #203 (pending 29/67/170 are still on the board)

or

B) Jaylen, Duck, #233 for #203 and 243

Any interest?

I could always counter with 
C) Duck and #233 for 203

or

D) Duck for 243

Edited by bigben07MVP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, bigben07MVP said:

Ok guys, I’ve been pounding the phones and I’ve discovered a trade partner for Samuels/Duck

A) Jaylen and #233 for #203 (pending 29/67/170 are still on the board)

or

B) Jaylen, Duck, #233 for #203 and 243

Any interest?

I could always counter with 
C) Duck and #233 for 203

or

D) Duck for 243

I like B OR A and D.

We need picks to address K and M OR H.

I hate getting so little value for Samuels.  But, we have extra now.  If, in a way, it gets us 29 or 67, that is at least an upgrade in ST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, bigben07MVP said:

Ok guys, I’ve been pounding the phones and I’ve discovered a trade partner for Samuels/Duck

A) Jaylen and #233 for #203 (pending 29/67/170 are still on the board)

or

B) Jaylen, Duck, #233 for #203 and 243

Any interest?

I could always counter with 
C) Duck and #233 for 203

or

D) Duck for 243

Should we pull the trigger? My vote would be trade B. We have JT Barrett/Paxton Lynch to compete for the 3rd QB. And Jaylen Samuels is pretty much pointless with Akers/Conner/Snell/White on board. I would love to snag 170/67 at #203 and still have 233 to address K/M/H

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kurgan said:

If we can swing a trade, we are on the clock in two picks.

67 would seem to be the target at this point.  73 if 67 goes.  170 as well....

I would say between 67 and 170.

170 would probably have my vote. We still have a huge hole there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bigben07MVP said:

I would say between 67 and 170.

170 would probably have my vote. We still have a huge hole there.

I would agree this is the two guys to decide between.

I would say that we have holes in both spots.  But, the hole is bigger in 170's slot, and there are more guys in column K to play.  At this point, they all seem to have the same value to me.. they are maybe a bit better defenders than Dirty Red but not as good special teamers.  I like 67, 73, 81 (as a conversion guy), and 82 (which someone added and he looks intriguing).

170 represents a higher value for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...