bigben07MVP Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 (edited) Ok guys, I’ve been pounding the phones and I’ve discovered a trade partner for Samuels/Duck A) Jaylen and #233 for #203 (pending 29/67/170 are still on the board) or B) Jaylen, Duck, #233 for #203 and 243 Any interest? I could always counter with C) Duck and #233 for 203 or D) Duck for 243 Edited April 13, 2020 by bigben07MVP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cbrunn Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Nice work getting Taylor guys I'd trade jaylen and duck for picks Just jaylen and duck for the picks and keep our 233 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cbrunn Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 If you guys want that position 80, 29, 73 Or even I seen they met with some small school guy with crazy measurements (I think on Steelers depot) he could even be thrown in that list Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurgan Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 17 minutes ago, bigben07MVP said: Ok guys, I’ve been pounding the phones and I’ve discovered a trade partner for Samuels/Duck A) Jaylen and #233 for #203 (pending 29/67/170 are still on the board) or B) Jaylen, Duck, #233 for #203 and 243 Any interest? I could always counter with C) Duck and #233 for 203 or D) Duck for 243 I like B OR A and D. We need picks to address K and M OR H. I hate getting so little value for Samuels. But, we have extra now. If, in a way, it gets us 29 or 67, that is at least an upgrade in ST. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Guess I was wrong. Muse gone. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigben07MVP Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 1 hour ago, Chieferific said: Guess I was wrong. Muse gone. Vikings were going to snag him at #198 as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 8 minutes ago, bigben07MVP said: Vikings were going to snag him at #198 as well. I still think Taylor would have gone quicker. We had no chance of getting both apparently. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigben07MVP Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Just now, Chieferific said: I still think Taylor would have gone quicker. We had no chance of getting both apparently. I was still holding out hope we could trade up to 203 to snag Muse. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigben07MVP Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 16 hours ago, bigben07MVP said: Ok guys, I’ve been pounding the phones and I’ve discovered a trade partner for Samuels/Duck A) Jaylen and #233 for #203 (pending 29/67/170 are still on the board) or B) Jaylen, Duck, #233 for #203 and 243 Any interest? I could always counter with C) Duck and #233 for 203 or D) Duck for 243 Should we pull the trigger? My vote would be trade B. We have JT Barrett/Paxton Lynch to compete for the 3rd QB. And Jaylen Samuels is pretty much pointless with Akers/Conner/Snell/White on board. I would love to snag 170/67 at #203 and still have 233 to address K/M/H 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebrick Posted April 13, 2020 Author Share Posted April 13, 2020 sounds good 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurgan Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 25 minutes ago, bigben07MVP said: B) Jaylen, Duck, #233 for #203 and 243 It can't be 243 if we are trading with Arizona. 243 is Seattle... they have 253... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurgan Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 If we can swing a trade, we are on the clock in two picks. 67 would seem to be the target at this point. 73 if 67 goes. 170 as well.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigben07MVP Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 14 minutes ago, kurgan said: If we can swing a trade, we are on the clock in two picks. 67 would seem to be the target at this point. 73 if 67 goes. 170 as well.... I would say between 67 and 170. 170 would probably have my vote. We still have a huge hole there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurgan Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 1 minute ago, bigben07MVP said: I would say between 67 and 170. 170 would probably have my vote. We still have a huge hole there. I would agree this is the two guys to decide between. I would say that we have holes in both spots. But, the hole is bigger in 170's slot, and there are more guys in column K to play. At this point, they all seem to have the same value to me.. they are maybe a bit better defenders than Dirty Red but not as good special teamers. I like 67, 73, 81 (as a conversion guy), and 82 (which someone added and he looks intriguing). 170 represents a higher value for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MOSteelers56 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 I like 170 here. He’s got a much better chance of doing something for the team than 67. 67 struggles to make the team IMO. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.