Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
dcat

Michael Pittman vs Chase Claypool

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, brownie man said:

I’m afraid Claypool is Bucky Hodges 

He's Temuchin now lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Claypool is a better athlete and more importantly he's not from USC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on the team and need. Pittman is definitely more well rounded as a WR but if your looking for a blocker, TE/Wr hybrid then Claypool is your guy. If you are looking to have depth then Claypool but if your looking for a day one starter Pittman is your guy. These have been my top 2 guys for the bills before the Diggs trade and still would be happy to land one if available in 2/3 rd. Jeudy, Ruggs, and Lamb weren't falling to the bills at 22 and these guys were my options for 2nd rd while going a different position at 22. Claypool fits the bills better now then Pittman, they do not need someone to come in right away to make an impact and the bills can use him in special packages. Plus he is a northern guy so the cold weather on catching the ball shouldn't be as big of an impact as a guy from Cali. I also like Claypool's ceiling as it could be higher then Pittmans. Either way I think whatever team drafts these guys will be a great addition to a team that does not need a #1 wr.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Claypool by a wide margin for me. Most WR need a while to learn the trade at this level. The difference in rookie production is not worth the extra value two, three years down the line.

J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



×