Karnage84 Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 Matt Harmon of Yahoo! Sports just dropped a top 10 list of worst backfields in NFL. Martha Ford must have paid him off because we somehow didn't wind up on that list. 1) Tampa Bay 2) Miami 3) LA Rams 4) Atlanta 5) Kansas City 6) Washington 7) Pittsburgh 8) Buffalo 9) Jacksonville 10) LA Chargers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sllim Pickens Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, Karnage84 said: Matt Harmon of Yahoo! Sports just dropped a top 10 list of worst backfields in NFL. Martha Ford must have paid him off because we somehow didn't wind up on that list. 1) Tampa Bay 2) Miami 3) LA Rams 4) Atlanta 5) Kansas City 6) Washington 7) Pittsburgh 8) Buffalo 9) Jacksonville 10) LA Chargers I'd rather have Atlanta, KC, Jacksonville, Buffalo and LAC from that list. Its a poor list. If you want to discount Gurley for being hurt, you have to discount KJ for being hurt. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael1976 Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 6 hours ago, Karnage84 said: Matt Harmon of Yahoo! Sports just dropped a top 10 list of worst backfields in NFL. Martha Ford must have paid him off because we somehow didn't wind up on that list. 1) Tampa Bay 2) Miami 3) LA Rams 4) Atlanta 5) Kansas City 6) Washington 7) Pittsburgh 8) Buffalo 9) Jacksonville 10) LA Chargers And content like this reminds me why Yahoo Sports is one the top 10 worst places to get your sports information. I’ll listen to their recycled bits of other peoples content, but when it comes to their own stories/opinions I’ll take a pass. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Yeah, I just don't see it. An injury-prone, unproven KJ and really not much else. We should be in the argument for top 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karnage84 Posted April 17, 2020 Author Share Posted April 17, 2020 18 minutes ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said: Yeah, I just don't see it. An injury-prone, unproven KJ and really not much else. We should be in the argument for top 5. RB1: Kerryon 'injury-prone but decent when healthy which is rarely' Johnson RB2: Bo 'UDFA from big school that has looked ok in small sample size but bounced around' Scarborough RB3: Ty '5th rounder that hasn't shown a lot despite incredible speed' Johnson Even if you wanted to be bullish on KJ and/or Bo, we should still be a top 10 team at a minimum. We should be in that #10 spot over LAC for sure. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Absolutely. The best-case, full-blown homerism take still has us in the top 10. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superduperman Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Even when relatively healthy, Kerryon didn't impress me much last year. Scarbrough and Johnson aren't even worth mentioning, we could replace them with two UDFA's and there would be little or no difference. Looking over the article, I'd put his top 3 on par with the Lions. As for the rest, the Lions are worse, no contest. As with a lot of current NFL media, I think this guy just doesn't care enough about the Lions to even examine or mention them, good or bad. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karnage84 Posted April 17, 2020 Author Share Posted April 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, Superduperman said: Even when relatively healthy, Kerryon didn't impress me much last year. Scarbrough and Johnson aren't even worth mentioning, we could replace them with two UDFA's and there would be little or no difference. Looking over the article, I'd put his top 3 on par with the Lions. As for the rest, the Lions are worse, no contest. As with a lot of current NFL media, I think this guy just doesn't care enough about the Lions to even examine or mention them, good or bad. Agreed. The most attention that we'll get is the nonsense Stafford trade rumours to NE to "help out BB". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diehardlionfan Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 I don’t this fellow watches much football. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karnage84 Posted April 19, 2020 Author Share Posted April 19, 2020 Any interest in trading for Leonard Fournette? Assuming he'd be had for a 4th or 5th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 13 minutes ago, Karnage84 said: Any interest in trading for Leonard Fournette? Assuming he'd be had for a 4th or 5th. Yes 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigC421/ Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 (edited) Cap hits about 4m if I’m reading that right. I’d have no problem taking a chance on him at a 4/5 price. Edited April 19, 2020 by BigC421/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyguy1609 Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 Wonder if the jags would include fournette, & yannick as part of a trade up for pick 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 Thursday will be very interesting, and can not get here soon enough. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diehardlionfan Posted April 20, 2020 Share Posted April 20, 2020 7 hours ago, Lionized said: Thursday will be very interesting, and can not get here soon enough. We NEED Thursday. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.