Jump to content

Draft Day Thread: Day 1


MrOaktown_56

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, RaidersAreOne said:

 

this would have to happen for the yannik scenario to unfold. i still dont think it's worth a first rounder to get it done, especially if gabe isn't going to garner anything more than a KO like mid round pick. also means they must be quite confident in Denzel Good or Kush

Edited by Turnobili
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't make that deal myself, but they do have what, 13 picks? beside the cost, if youre worried about tuas medicals I get it, but im in the very small minority that like JH, and that's fine with me. and just like if brown slips he` s using it as motivation. Herbert might be very motivated to prove people wrong. I like burrow, he seems like a very good prospect but he`s not even the best rated almost guaranteed no bust player in the draft imo. that distinction belongs to chase young. as long as he stays healthy. (just remembering when Arizona did us a favor and took wadsworth, we all know who we got.lol!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Juice giving “Twitter World” some good insight.

i love OJ...switched from #44 (played FB and LB) to #32 after he caught his case cuZ of him.  Rooted for his guilt arse thru the whole trial lol.. my dad took us out to ground round restaurant to celebrate his acquittal!

Edited by jimkelly02
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, agarcia34 said:

Would be lucky to get a 5th imo. He has no value he’s an OG with a high salary. 

Just take the 5th that’s offered and not try and get rich with a 3rd... if you wanna spend that money elsewhere.  If you ain’t got plans for it then keep him.  Which I think we do. I’m indifferent either way.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Turnobili said:

there was always justification to move gabe because his play has fallen off last couple of years (injuries have played a role), but the time to move him was earlier instead of restructuring Hudson. poor planning

With carry over of the cap it really makes little difference.  We’re not gonna cut Hudson in next 2 years anyway... im THE strickler when it comes to waistinf cap space but the restructure of Hudson has little effect on later years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jimkelly02 said:

Just take the 5th that’s offered and not try and get rich with a 3rd... if you wanna spend that money elsewhere.  If you ain’t got plans for it then keep him.  Which I think we do. I’m indifferent either way.

Pretty much how I look at it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jimkelly02 said:

With carry over of the cap it really makes little difference.  We’re not gonna cut Hudson in next 2 years anyway... im THE strickler when it comes to waistinf cap space but the restructure of Hudson has little effect on later years

it makes a difference because gabe could be let go of with zero dead money, whereas with hudson we're guaranteeing higher cap hits year to year. and if his play falls off a cliff, we cant cut him without dead money, which wasnt the case before

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...