JetsandI Posted April 19, 2021 Share Posted April 19, 2021 31 minutes ago, KingOfNewYork said: Kylin Hill is one of my targets for Running Back, I like those guys who fight for every single yard. He can also be a threat in the passing game. Nope... Lousy character. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingOfNewYork Posted April 19, 2021 Share Posted April 19, 2021 1 minute ago, JetsandI said: Nope... Lousy character. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsandI Posted April 19, 2021 Share Posted April 19, 2021 29 minutes ago, KingOfNewYork said: ? He isn't a team player. Complained about offense stalling. Quit on them, using Covid as an excuse to opt out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingOfNewYork Posted April 19, 2021 Share Posted April 19, 2021 11 minutes ago, JetsandI said: He isn't a team player. Complained about offense stalling. Quit on them, using Covid as an excuse to opt out. I mean idk how much I can hold that against him. But I understand him expressing displeasure isn't the best look. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsandI Posted April 19, 2021 Share Posted April 19, 2021 3 minutes ago, KingOfNewYork said: I mean idk how much I can hold that against him. But I understand him expressing displeasure isn't the best look. RB and complaint don't mix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsandI Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 Trey Lance probably is 3rd qb off the board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingOfNewYork Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 Let's look at who's a lock to go in the 1st 22 picks. Lawrence, Wilson, Lance, Jones, Fields, Pitts, Chase, Smith, Waddle, Sewell, Slater, Surtain, Horn, Darrisaw(14) I think those 14 are locks. That leaves us with the possibility of one of these guys at 23. Jenkins, AVT, Parsons, Farley, Newsome, Collins, Philips, Paye, Harris. That's 9 off the top of my head. I think you could make an argument that those 23 players listed could all be top 12ish picks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 7 hours ago, KingOfNewYork said: Let's look at who's a lock to go in the 1st 22 picks. Lawrence, Wilson, Lance, Jones, Fields, Pitts, Chase, Smith, Waddle, Sewell, Slater, Surtain, Horn, Darrisaw(14) I think those 14 are locks. That leaves us with the possibility of one of these guys at 23. Jenkins, AVT, Parsons, Farley, Newsome, Collins, Philips, Paye, Harris. That's 9 off the top of my head. I think you could make an argument that those 23 players listed could all be top 12ish picks. I just hope JD doesn't get too cute and still tries and get more picks. Grab legit talent if there. He got lucky last year with that Mims trade. 99% of the time, that situation doesn't work out like that. For me if AVT or Jenkins are there... they have to be the pick. If they're gone. Go with Farley or Newsome. If all 4 are gone... go Humphrey or one of the RBs (I like Harris more, but I still love Etienne as well). BUT.... If we go RB at 23... I think we have to go OL at 34. That's just my opinion. Bc investing that high of a pick on a RB and giving them the same OL, just isn't smart. So immediately get that OL help. Maybe Humphrey is still there. Or draft Davis there, he should still be around then. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doumeyer Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 1 hour ago, Bobby816 said: I just hope JD doesn't get too cute and still tries and get more picks. Grab legit talent if there. He got lucky last year with that Mims trade. 99% of the time, that situation doesn't work out like that. For me if AVT or Jenkins are there... they have to be the pick. If they're gone. Go with Farley or Newsome. If all 4 are gone... go Humphrey or one of the RBs (I like Harris more, but I still love Etienne as well). BUT.... If we go RB at 23... I think we have to go OL at 34. That's just my opinion. Bc investing that high of a pick on a RB and giving them the same OL, just isn't smart. So immediately get that OL help. Maybe Humphrey is still there. Or draft Davis there, he should still be around then. Your post makes all the sense in the world. I just hope it goes that way. We have enough draft picks for a couple of years we don't need any more. Now we need quality picks in the draft.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xrade Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 3 minutes ago, doumeyer said: Your post makes all the sense in the world. I just hope it goes that way. We have enough draft picks for a couple of years we don't need any more. Now we need quality picks in the draft.. The team is not good and we need a lot of talent, we can always use more draft picks. We now have a GM who truly wants to build through the draft and acquiring more picks will speed the rebuild. I don’t think JD would pass on a talent just to do that. For example, if Parsons, Jenkins, Newsome, Farley or Collins are there for us, we will take them. We may even trade up a couple of spots if the opportunity is there. But beyond that, why not trade down a bit. Another example, if AVT is there but we can trade down a little and get another 3rd then draft Creed or Dickerson, would that not be better? Is the talent of those two plus a third really worse tan AVT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 28 minutes ago, xrade said: The team is not good and we need a lot of talent, we can always use more draft picks. We now have a GM who truly wants to build through the draft and acquiring more picks will speed the rebuild. I don’t think JD would pass on a talent just to do that. For example, if Parsons, Jenkins, Newsome, Farley or Collins are there for us, we will take them. We may even trade up a couple of spots if the opportunity is there. But beyond that, why not trade down a bit. Another example, if AVT is there but we can trade down a little and get another 3rd then draft Creed or Dickerson, would that not be better? Is the talent of those two plus a third really worse tan AVT? I get that... but you pretty much have 22 starters. So when we have existing talent. 5 picks in the 1st 3 rounds this year, 5 picks in the 1st 3 rounds next year, the FAs we added, etc. It’s about quality but quantity. We need to quit filling backup and ST roles. And get starting offensive and defensive talent. You accumulate a lot of mid round and late round picks... and that’s generally what you get. Just draft the starting talent right in front of you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickyt31 Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 This is the time I start taking draft news seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickyt31 Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 Sheesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingOfNewYork Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 24 minutes ago, rickyt31 said: Sheesh Unreal. Revis Island type numbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KBS756 Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 24 minutes ago, rickyt31 said: Sheesh So no chance he’s there at 23 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.