Skippy Posted May 9, 2020 Share Posted May 9, 2020 On 5/7/2020 at 11:01 PM, Outpost31 said: 47-0 or 67-15 loss at San Francisco? Obviously I’m being sarcastic. It’s going to be a billion to one. After absolutely failing 100% in the draft on anything to stop the run, I think it will be brutal again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gopackgo972 Posted May 9, 2020 Share Posted May 9, 2020 10 minutes ago, Skippy said: After absolutely failing 100% in the draft on anything to stop the run, I think it will be brutal again. One draft wasn’t going to improve this run D. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebpackfan Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 Or our receivers for 2020. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 On 5/9/2020 at 7:08 AM, Pugger said: Welcome back. At least you got to go somewhere. Didnt actually "go somewhere" per se.....just got outside and got after a few landscaping projects that I'd been planning for awhile....or "planning" that I had to figure out (read: design) and get after. So I tuned down the news and got after them - successfully if I might say. Good outcomes that will lead to future growth/changes. In the process I reconnected with a few things that I enjoy connecting to...which is always a good thing....and I dont appear to have missed a great deal on the Packer front. So - a good trade off 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted May 15, 2020 Share Posted May 15, 2020 On 5/8/2020 at 11:15 PM, Arthur Penske said: I think SF is going to slightly regress, but I wish this wasn't like the 3rd game in a row vs them on the road. We always seem to go to New Orleans every year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skippy Posted May 18, 2020 Share Posted May 18, 2020 On 5/9/2020 at 9:43 AM, YaddaHolla said: One draft wasn’t going to improve this run D. If it truly was a priority it definitely could have. We had a chance at Queen and then turn around and draft a DT sometime in the next few rounds and your run defense is a new team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted May 18, 2020 Share Posted May 18, 2020 3 hours ago, Skippy said: If it truly was a priority it definitely could have. We had a chance at Queen and then turn around and draft a DT sometime in the next few rounds and your run defense is a new team. Yes, because third round DTs are known for being huge positive contributors in year 1. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.