Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, swede700 said:

Agree.  But, they only move ahead of Denver for Fields.  

Unless they want to get ahead of Dallas and New York for Sewell/Slater, and Denver doesn’t want to move down with Fields on the board. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SemperFeist said:

Unless they want to get ahead of Dallas and New York for Sewell/Slater, and Denver doesn’t want to move down with Fields on the board. 

While they could, I still don't see the Giants or Cowboys taking OL.  Both of their defenses aren't very good and the best defensive players are on the board.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SemperFeist said:

Draft night scenario;

1. Jacksonville - Trevor Lawrence, QB

2. New York Jets - Zach Wilson, QB

3. San Francisco - Mac Jones, QB

4. Atlanta - Trey Lance, QB

5. Cincinnati - J’Marr Chase, WR

6. Miami - Kyle Pitts, TE

7. Detroit - Jaylon Waddle, WR

8. **TRADE** Minnesota is on the clock

 

What are you feeling?

How much would it take to trade up for that pick. I'd go Sewell with the little I know. 

 

Someone has to help me get off his bandwagon 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, vikesfan89 said:

How much would it take to trade up for that pick. I'd go Sewell with the little I know. 

 

Someone has to help me get off his bandwagon 

He's worth it and would be a staple on the line for a decade. Don't get off the bandwagon

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, AP_allday2869 said:

He's worth it and would be a staple on the line for a decade. Don't get off the bandwagon

Yeah I know.  Which is why it'll be a pretty big disappointment when it doesn't happen

Link to post
Share on other sites

For about a decade now I’ve been putting my boards (don’t really make them anymore) into tiered lists, and I’ve started to do that more with the aggregate board as well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RpMc said:

For about a decade now I’ve been putting my boards (don’t really make them anymore) into tiered lists, and I’ve started to do that more with the aggregate board as well. 

Yep. It’s always why I laugh when people complain and bemoan that a team “over drafted” a guy because they saw some top 100 list where the player drafted was listed as the 40th player, and their team picked 20th. When in reality, teams likely had guys 15 through 50 on the list all with second round grades. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/15/2021 at 6:40 AM, SemperFeist said:

It’s not a 1-256 list like how the media likes to make it seem. 

I thought it was general knowledge that teams grade players based on tiers.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, CWood21 said:

I thought it was general knowledge that teams grade players based on tiers.

Only if you pay attention to it as closely as everyone here does.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, swede700 said:

Only if you pay attention to it as closely as everyone here does.  

We drafted player 15?!?

We could have had player 10!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...