Kiltman Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiltman Posted May 14, 2020 Author Share Posted May 14, 2020 Some strong # analytics here like Wallace officially in #42, Price in #72 has me convinced he’s a lock to be on the roster. Hurts in 2 is solid. Gotta think Quez and Hightower are biding their time until some of the vets who have at least #14, #16 (if not #13, #17 too) are off the roster. Had a ton of LB numbers open. All solid choices. Don’t love #18 for Reagor but it was the best option available. Looks solid. Jack has to pick it up, he gets a slight pass since he’ll be IOL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjapirate Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 3 hours ago, Kiltman said: Some strong # analytics here like Wallace officially in #42, Price in #72 has me convinced he’s a lock to be on the roster. Hurts in 2 is solid. Gotta think Quez and Hightower are biding their time until some of the vets who have at least #14, #16 (if not #13, #17 too) are off the roster. Had a ton of LB numbers open. All solid choices. Don’t love #18 for Reagor but it was the best option available. Looks solid. Jack has to pick it up, he gets a slight pass since he’ll be IOL. I like receiver numbers in the 80s i think they look dumb in the 10s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mm6492 Posted May 15, 2020 Share Posted May 15, 2020 Reagor in 18 giving me (bad) flashbacks to Maclin (whom I loved in college). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mm6492 Posted May 15, 2020 Share Posted May 15, 2020 Jalen Hurts #2 on the field. #1 in our hearts. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiltman Posted May 15, 2020 Author Share Posted May 15, 2020 3 hours ago, ninjapirate said: I like receiver numbers in the 80s i think they look dumb in the 10s As do I, but none of them seem to want them ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted May 18, 2020 Share Posted May 18, 2020 I can sleep at night now that I finally know what number Casey Toohill will wear..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nlesthought Posted May 19, 2020 Share Posted May 19, 2020 I normally think the NFL is too uptight on jersey #s... but I also think if the Eagles jerseys number template looked better I'd be ok with single digits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blahstoise Posted May 19, 2020 Share Posted May 19, 2020 On 15/05/2020 at 3:10 AM, Kiltman said: As do I, but none of them seem to want them ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I used to be all about the 80's, but now I like only 81 and 88 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted May 19, 2020 Share Posted May 19, 2020 1 hour ago, nlesthought said: I normally think the NFL is too uptight on jersey #s... but I also think if the Eagles jerseys number template looked better I'd be ok with single digits. The Eagles need to stop semi-retiring numbers. And of all the ones to semi retire, they didn't do it with Westbrook, which is baffling to me. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.