TNF: Bears @ Packers

[Ragnarok]

1 minute ago, CWood21 said:

So because CFB refs use the rule too loosely, it's a bad rule?  For a league that has been sued for a multi-billion (I believe) dollar lawsuit, player safety has to come first.

Just expanded on my comment.

I think suspensions should be decided after the game.  Because a hit like that deserves one.  But I don't agree with the in-game suspension for grazing a helmet.  Harsher punishments for the legitimately dangerous hits.  I think the system is too reactive in its current form.  

[JiffyJag]

Just now, Kiwibrown said:

irregardless, 

oh boy

[dante9876]

Just now, incognito_man said:

 

Thats not close to what the ref said. 

[pheltzbahr]

Glennon is not good.  Discuss.

[FinneasGage]

really is one of the more depressing plays i've seen man. hope he can bounce back especially on the brink of cashing in. worst i've felt for a dude since jermichael. 

[Pats#1]

Glennon giving my D/ST the cherry on top

[JJ6]

Glennon is terrible. No Cohen. Go home bears you're drunk. 

[incognito_man]

Just now, dante9876 said:

Thats not close to what the ref said. 

most of the time they don't quote the entire rule book.

[Ragnarok]

2 minutes ago, Kiwibrown said:

irregardless, typo, get over it. a man nearly lost his life, may have a terrible injury that ends his career. 

Um...how in the world can you make that statement with any sort of legitimacy?

[Onizuka]

Just now, pheltzbahr said:

Glennon is not good.  Discuss.

Yep...but because he plays QB....he's making 30 million in 2 years? Lol......must be awesome to suck at your job and get overpaid.

[JAF-N72EX]

Just now, pheltzbahr said:

Glennon is not good.  Discuss.

Sure he is. He is guaranteeing a top pick for the Bears who desperately need it. Job well done.

[Kiwibrown]

8 minutes ago, Jaguarfan said:

oh boy

use a sentence,  silly. 

[jrry32]

3 minutes ago, CWood21 said:

So because CFB refs use the rule too loosely, it's a bad rule?  For a league that has been sued for a multi-billion (I believe) dollar lawsuit, player safety has to come first.

Dude, provide some actual evidence that it makes any difference for player safety to have ejections instead of personal fouls. You know what...I don't care. It's not worth the time to debate this. You'll throw a major temper tantrum the first time a key Packers player gets ejected for an unintentional hit to the head. Don't use player safety as a crutch for your weak argument.

[K9]

Just now, pheltzbahr said:

Glennon is not good.  Discuss.

literally LoL'd

[CWood21]

Just now, Ragnarok said:

Just expanded on my comment.

I think suspensions should be decided after the game.  Because a hit like that deserves one.  But I don't agree with the in-game suspension for grazing a helmet.  Harsher punishments for the legitimately dangerous hits.  I think the system is too reactive in its current form.  

The NFL isn't going to suspend a player, let's be real about this.  LIS, if you have issues with implementation then tweak the rule.  You get called for a targeting call in the game, you're allowed to play and if you receive a 2nd one during the game you're immediately ejected.  At the end of the week's game, the NFL reviews those targeting calls AND if the player is deemed to have illegally "targeting" that player, he is automatically suspended the next week.  Your complaints are with the implementation of the rule, not the reason the rule in place.