Jump to content

Sean McVay vs Doug Pederson


Chargers

Who is the better head coach? Sean McVay or Doug Pederson   

80 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the better head coach? Sean McVay or Doug Pederson



Recommended Posts

On 7/14/2020 at 3:53 PM, Matts4313 said:

A poll with over 1M responses ranked Dak better.

The 2 biggest Eagles based publications ranked Dak better.

An Eagles Fan ranking based on ESPN, NFL.com, PFF, ANY/A and Footballs outsiders ranked Dak better

It is clear AF who the better QB is.

Lets check out their playoff stats

And yet, the Cowboys won't commit to Dak long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jrry32 said:

And yet, the Cowboys won't commit to Dak long term.

How do you figure? The primary issue is that Dak wouldnt commit to the Cowboys long term. Cowboys were hell bent on 5 years. Dak wouldnt go past 4. He originally wanted 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Matts4313 said:

How do you figure? The primary issue is that Dak wouldnt commit to the Cowboys long term. Cowboys were hell bent on 5 years. Dak wouldnt go past 4. He originally wanted 3.

Actions speak louder than words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Matts4313 said:

Yeah, the actions of the Cowboys were they offered 5yr @$35m/yr and Dak said no. 4 years or I dont sign. Sooooo, just admit you were wrong and we can move on.

If the Cowboys really valued him, they could have signed him for four years. What sort of logic are you employing here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jrry32 said:

If the Cowboys really valued him, they could have signed him for four years. What sort of logic are you employing here?

The Cowboys admitted that "they dont sign franchise players for less than 5 years". They wanted to make Dak the 2nd highest paid player in the league, and Dak said no.

What logic are you employing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matts4313 said:

The Cowboys admitted that "they dont sign franchise players for less than 5 years". They wanted to make Dak the 2nd highest paid player in the league, and Dak said no.

What logic are you employing?

Simple logic. Actions speak louder than words. Dak offered to remain for four years. Cowboys claim they offered five. Cowboys could have signed him for four, but didn't value him enough to make that move. But yes, I'm sure they wouldn't bend their stringent rules for anybody. xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jrry32 said:

Simple logic. Actions speak louder than words. Dak offered to remain for four years. Cowboys claim they offered five. Cowboys could have signed him for four, but didn't value him enough to make that move. But yes, I'm sure they wouldn't bend their stringent rules for anybody. xD

Dak started at 3 years. 

Cowboys started at 6 years.

They moved to 4 and 5. Couldnt get past that. The reality is the Cowboys wanted to make him the 2nd highest paid player in the NFL. Im not sure how you dont understand they wanted to commit long term to him 

"Cowboys dont value him because they only wanted to make him the 2nd highest paid player" 

That is some dumb logic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Matts4313 said:

Dak started at 3 years. 

Cowboys started at 6 years.

They moved to 4 and 5. Couldnt get past that. The reality is the Cowboys wanted to make him the 2nd highest paid player in the NFL. Im not sure how you dont understand they wanted to commit long term to him 

"Cowboys dont value him because they only wanted to make him the 2nd highest paid player" 

That is some dumb logic. 

I'm saying the Cowboys are all talk. Four years versus five years isn't a good reason to refuse to re-sign your supposed franchise QB. Actions speak louder than words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jrry32 said:

I'm saying the Cowboys are all talk. Four years versus five years isn't a good reason to refuse to re-sign your supposed franchise QB. Actions speak louder than words.

Dak was offered a deal larger than Wentz, Goff, Arod, Wilson, etc. Actions speak louder than words. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jrry32 said:

That's certainly what the Cowboys claim. Yet, here we are.

Dude, its been reported by everyone since March. DAK TURNED THEM DOWN. I am not sure where you are confused. Im really not. Its like you cant just accept you are wrong. 

Good day sir. I wont beat my head against a wall with someone who has no humility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/14/2020 at 1:53 PM, Matts4313 said:

A poll with over 1M responses ranked Dak better.

The 2 biggest Eagles based publications ranked Dak better.

An Eagles Fan ranking based on ESPN, NFL.com, PFF, ANY/A and Footballs outsiders ranked Dak better

It is clear AF who the better QB is.

Lets check out their playoff stats

Dak is so good, the cowboys won't pay him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...