43M Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 5 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said: I bet JJSS is pretty high? I'm convinced it's all about social media..lol Neither Juju or Pouncey deserve to be that high. You could perhaps argue Juju was held back a good bit by QB play last year, but he sure as hell shouldnt be have a higher overall than TJ. Pouncey was staight trash last year. He should be in the mid or low 70s. Watt should at least be a 90. Only thing Ill say remotely defending this is that overalls dont mean too much...its alot more about individual skill ratings, but when you tout the overall rating and show certain players rated much higher or lower than they should be.... ....you know what....I'm overthinking this. Its just easier to say EA sucks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted July 16, 2020 Author Share Posted July 16, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 Jaire being the same as White and ahead of Humphrey is..... something 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 On 7/13/2020 at 10:02 AM, JBURGE said: Barkley should be higher than Aaron Jones, yikes. Around the same as Cook and Chubb. Barkley should be higher than Cook and Chubb.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 11 minutes ago, Danger said: On 7/13/2020 at 10:02 AM, JBURGE said: Barkley should be higher than Aaron Jones, yikes. Around the same as Cook and Chubb. Barkley should be higher than Cook and Chubb.... I have no issue with him being lower than them, as long as it's a couple points. I think they both have an argument. I would rank them Barkley = Cook > Chubb, but all within a couple points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 Just now, JBURGE said: I have no issue with him being lower than them, as long as it's a couple points. I think they both have an argument. I would rank them Barkley = Cook > Chubb, but all within a couple points. if CMC is a 99, and Zeke is a 93. Barkley should be around 95 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 11 minutes ago, Danger said: if CMC is a 99, and Zeke is a 93. Barkley should be around 95 I'm trying not to use actual numbers, because I think CMC being what 6 points ahead of everyone else is ridiculous, but sure. I think Barkley could be 95, I actually like where he is at 89 if they were to bring everyone else down. Cook an 89, Chubb 88. Or Barkley 95, Cook 95, Chubb 94. Something like that. They're bad where they stand, because Caff is not 10 points better than Barkley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted July 17, 2020 Share Posted July 17, 2020 Barkley is an actual freak that doesn't make any sense. It's like he's a glitch or something. To not even have him 90 is absolutely hilarious. Is he poleing the developers wife? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggio7 Posted July 17, 2020 Share Posted July 17, 2020 Ratings used to be good and mattered. But, they really don't matter at all. Speed matters and that's it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted July 17, 2020 Share Posted July 17, 2020 Yeah that's correct. I'm sounding off about Saquon's ratings but it doesn't matter. If it is scripted or animated that a 64 rated CB will run him down, then run him down he shall - it doesn't matter. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted July 17, 2020 Share Posted July 17, 2020 8 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said: Barkley is an actual freak that doesn't make any sense. It's like he's a glitch or something. To not even have him 90 is absolutely hilarious. Is he poleing the developers wife? He's at 91. https://www.ea.com/games/madden-nfl/madden-nfl-21/player-ratings Below Henry and Chubb, tied with Dalvin Cook. Which is insulting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted July 17, 2020 Share Posted July 17, 2020 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Danger said: He's at 91. https://www.ea.com/games/madden-nfl/madden-nfl-21/player-ratings Below Henry and Chubb, tied with Dalvin Cook. Which is insulting. I think it's fine. I'd probably have him in that 3-6 range, so I don't think it's insulting. Edited July 17, 2020 by JBURGE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted July 17, 2020 Author Share Posted July 17, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Romen Posted July 17, 2020 Share Posted July 17, 2020 13 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said: Diggs ain't a 92. Cooper ain't a 93. Allen ain't a 91. I'd make em 85/87/87. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted July 17, 2020 Author Share Posted July 17, 2020 No respect for Waller after posting 90 receptions and 1,145 yards. Smh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.