Jump to content

Brewing war over pay for 2020 is starting


jebrick

Recommended Posts

Quote

On Tuesday, NFL Network’s Tom Pelissero reported that the NFLPA informed its board of representatives that the league has had discussions about holding 35% of players’ salaries in escrow in an effort to make up for the inevitable lost revenue during the 2020 season due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Quote

This is gonna be a contentious couple of weeks between the NFL and the NFLPA.

I HOPE it stays behind closed doors but, I feel like this tweet is a rather large implication that it will not.

Fireworks coming.

Ultimately season will be played tho... right?

— Pat McAfee (@PatMcAfeeShow)

 

The article is Steeler centric ( as it is a Pittsburgh paper) but id does highlight what others pointed out months ago.  If there is no or limited season in 2020, the revenue/salary cap will drop in 2021.  A lot.  But the NFLPA and the Owners can negociate but will they? 

https://www.post-gazette.com/sports/steelers/2020/07/08/nfl-proposed-pay-cut-escrow-35-percent-steelers-reaction-devin-bush/stories/202007080137

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AntonChigurh said:

That escrow stuff is nonsense. Just an excuse to steal from the players. 

It's a cash flow thing.  It's a way for the owners to avoid doing more creative things to keep the operation going.  Or rather, a way for them to keep their personal cash flow going.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, theJ said:

It's a cash flow thing.  It's a way for the owners to avoid doing more creative things to keep the operation going.  Or rather, a way for them to keep their personal cash flow going.

Maybe these owners should pull themselves up by their bootstraps and stopping living cash dump to cash dump. If they say, cut back on the square footage of their yachts and stop buying avocado toast, they could live well within their means. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, animaltested said:

Maybe these owners should pull themselves up by their bootstraps and stopping living cash dump to cash dump. If they say, cut back on the square footage of their yachts and stop buying avocado toast, they could live well within their means. 

Hey man, i agree.  I think it's a little ludicrous.  Billionaires, making sure they can maintain their lifestyle while keeping 35% of a 7th round rookie's paycheck.  

What makes it worse is that they know this will bounce back in 2021.  It's not like they're risking anything long term.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know there really isnt precedent, but wouldnt they think to put a clause in case of emergency shut down of the league in the CBA? Maybe not like specefic this is the step by step in any shut down situation because any situation like this one is too nuanced to know what to put. I mean like a clause that states if the league must suspend games indefinitely for x amount of time due to circumstances outside of anyone's control owners can do x, y, and z to preserve the financial well being of their franchise until/unless play resumes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Deadpulse said:

I know there really isnt precedent, but wouldnt they think to put a clause in case of emergency shut down of the league in the CBA? Maybe not like specefic this is the step by step in any shut down situation because any situation like this one is too nuanced to know what to put. I mean like a clause that states if the league must suspend games indefinitely for x amount of time due to circumstances outside of anyone's control owners can do x, y, and z to preserve the financial well being of their franchise until/unless play resumes.

There is. The problem is that it is meant for if they aren't playing any games. If ownership cancelled the season outright (like could have happened in MLB) then the players wouldn't get paid a dime. If they only played half a season, they's get 8 games worth of game checks. The problem is, it's impossible to forsee what exactly this season will look like revenue wise with no fans, some fans, full fans and that's what needs to be negotiated

Players salaries via the salary cap are a percentage of "Football Related Revenue" or whatever terminology the NFL uses. The new CBA with the 17th game added got the players (as a whole) up to 48.5% of FRR I believe. The problem is, if revenues are down 25% for 2020 how do they recoup that 25% from the players in 2020? Through escrow (withholding salaries) That's how

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from the new CBA deal:

What about existing contracts that run into seasons that could expand to 17 games? Will those be adjusted?

"Yes. Any player who is under contract when the new CBA is signed and remains on that contract in a year in which the league plays 17 games will receive a bonus of 1/17th of his salary if he's on the roster on the date of that 17th game.

So, to make it simple: If your current contract says you're scheduled to earn $17 million in 2021, and the league expands to 17 games that season, you get an extra $1 million as long as you're on the roster on the date of that 17th game."

 

So if they go to 17 reg season games next year, does that put added pressure on the cap space for each team ? It could be a couple of million$$ / each to cover existing contracts in a 17  game season. That would make it even harder to keep the 2021 cap flat or reduced

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...