El Ramster Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, Shady Slim said: the intro to nbc sunday night football gives me that vibe except you're brushing your teeth with a belt sander and you're brushing your face not your teeth Lol true that.. So cheesy.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 1 minute ago, y*so*blu said: You have to wonder how tedious it gets filming these overly elaborate SNF introductions...people walking awkwardly in front of green screens for dozens of takes, forcing smiles and pretending there's actually music playing. It's like relying on Bradford to stay healthy. Gets old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 21 minutes ago, Right Smarts said: Right now probably wasn't the best time to interview Michael Bennett . . . (Link removed) Not sure of the relevance of this. Not game day related, and touches on topics we choose not to discuss here. - ET Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 Dammmm that's a big boy singing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Slim Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 okay is that hurley from lost singing the anthem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kip Smithers Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 24 minutes ago, Right Smarts said: Right now probably wasn't the best time to interview Michael Bennett . . . Link removed Except he didn't lie. But this ain't the place to discuss this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y*so*blu Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 3 minutes ago, El ramster said: It's like relying on Bradford to stay healthy. Gets old. Very true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 #16 for the colts is a cutie.. Something to watch for or keep an eye out for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroncoBruin Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 1 minute ago, jrry32 said: Meh. We'll see. The one position that is problematic is ILB. I think the rest of the defense is fine. Of course, injuries can always become a problem. I'm not expecting great, but it would be nice to see good. Not anything you can hold against Wade there. Ogletree and Barron at ILB was a predictably failed experiment. One-gap scheme and you trot out a safety and coverage backer to hold up inside. That never had a chance of working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 Yo my thing turned into espn the ocho. Went from English to Spanish? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 14 minutes ago, BroncoBruin said: Not anything you can hold against Wade there. Ogletree and Barron at ILB was a predictably failed experiment. One-gap scheme and you trot out a safety and coverage backer to hold up inside. That never had a chance of working. I'm still hoping we'll see a change made. Problem is that Barron has the aggression and recklessness to fight off blocks, but he doesn't read keys well. Ogletree doesn't get off blocks and misses too many tackles. Part of it is a lack of familiarity with the scheme (Ogletree has looked this way in the past when breaking in a new defense), and part of it is just Ogletree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTTRDynasty Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 On 10/1/2017 at 11:44 AM, The LBC said: Edit: The same Jonathan Allen that has 7 combined tackles (4 of which were assisted) and a sack and you're pimping as a proven difference-maker. This is for you @The LBC Washington: Jonathan Allen has three sacks, two hits and seven hurries on 82 pass-rushes. That equates to a pass-rushing productivity of 11.9. That is third best for all interior defenders over the past 12 years. https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-32-nfl-observations-week-5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakuvious Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 32 minutes ago, HTTRG3Dynasty said: This is for you @The LBC Washington: Jonathan Allen has three sacks, two hits and seven hurries on 82 pass-rushes. That equates to a pass-rushing productivity of 11.9. That is third best for all interior defenders over the past 12 years. https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-32-nfl-observations-week-5 A few things here: 1. Using a rate stat when the season isn't even halfway over, and comparing that to full seasons of other players, is silly. By a similar token, Alex Smith right now has the highest completion % in NFL history by 5%. But anyone with some common sense (so probably not PFF) knows that those kinds of stats are likely to regress to the mean as a larger sample size is provided. 82 pass rushes is like 15% of a season for a full-time player. Now if that was 3rd best of all interior defenders through 4 games, that would provide a bit more context and be a meaningful comparison. But that doesn't appear to be how they describe that. 2. Where did they get 3 sacks from? The NFL has him at 1 sack. Now I know PFF doesn't do half sacks, they give full credit for half sacks, so sometimes a guy with like 7.5 per the NFL will have 9 per PFF. But even if he had 2 half sacks per the NFL, that would give him at most 2. So they're finding an entire sack in that total that no one else counted at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTTRDynasty Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 7 minutes ago, Jakuvious said: A few things here: 1. Using a rate stat when the season isn't even halfway over, and comparing that to full seasons of other players, is silly. By a similar token, Alex Smith right now has the highest completion % in NFL history by 5%. But anyone with some common sense (so probably not PFF) knows that those kinds of stats are likely to regress to the mean as a larger sample size is provided. 82 pass rushes is like 15% of a season for a full-time player. Now if that was 3rd best of all interior defenders through 4 games, that would provide a bit more context and be a meaningful comparison. But that doesn't appear to be how they describe that. 2. Where did they get 3 sacks from? The NFL has him at 1 sack. Now I know PFF doesn't do half sacks, they give full credit for half sacks, so sometimes a guy with like 7.5 per the NFL will have 9 per PFF. But even if he had 2 half sacks per the NFL, that would give him at most 2. So they're finding an entire sack in that total that no one else counted at all. The point is that LBC has been saying all offseason Jonathan Allen would not make much of an impact at the next level. Regardless of what you think about PFF, if you watch the games, you would see how wrong that POV has been so far. PFF is only confirming what I have seen; he's the main reason for our defensive improvement. And there were multiple times over the first 4 weeks where I think Allen should have been credited with a sack or a half sack, but wasn't. It looks like PFF included a couple of those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.