Forge Posted November 15, 2020 Share Posted November 15, 2020 Full ppr... Looking at moving Duke, higgins, Teddy b and Johnathan Taylor for kupp, Goff and robby Anderson. I want all the pieces of the Rams for the playoffs. I'm dropping Taylor this weekend anyway. I'm hoping he'll take it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted November 18, 2020 Share Posted November 18, 2020 Dynasty trade: My team is demolished by injuries. Will end up with a top 3 pick. Looking at the future. Would you do this deal I give up: Hopkins, David Johnson, Gio Bernard, Fletcher Cox, Rookie 3rd, Rookie 4th I get: McLaurin, Zack Moss, Danielle Hunter, Jeremy Chinn, Rookie 1st, Rookie 2nd it’s a salary cap league so there are cap implications here that I won’t go into, but I also shed a bunch of cap in the deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 Would you guys trade Adams for Ekeler straight up? I may be able to get a QB thrown in (not a small thing). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sad People Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 On 11/22/2020 at 4:34 PM, Forge said: Would you guys trade Adams for Ekeler straight up? I may be able to get a QB thrown in (not a small thing). davante adams? Hard no for me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 1 minute ago, mattyice0401 said: davante adams? Hard no for me. On the surface, it seems crazy...but the net gain may actually work in my favor if I can get the QB. I'd lose probably 14 points per game by going from Adams to my bench WR. I'm rolling out Wentz and PJ Walker right now at ...it's really rough (though I do have Teddy B). People are getting 50 points form their QB & OP spots, and sometimes I'm lucky to get 30 (I got exactly 20 this week, last week I got 10...this is a problem). The WW is barren. He has to get rid of a QB because Hill will lose TE eligibility this week and he'll exceed the maximum roster spots for Qbs. So I'd add either Tannehill or Big Ben. My RB2 spot is also a major issue. This week I add Hyde minutes before kick off, but I have to cut him loose this week with Carson back. Otherwise I've been rolling with Duke Johnson. I'm going to try and get Dobbins this week (I think we may have finally crossed over for him yesterday), but he's out this week with Covid for sure. If Ekeler is outscoring my current RB2 by 8-10 points per game (easily doable given what I'm throwing out there), then I just need the QB to outscore my own QBs by about 4-6 per week to make this worth while, which isn't impossible. The only reason that I'm hesitating right now is Wentz has a weak schedule moving forward, so you'd figure he'd just accidentally fall into some good games, and Teddy has actually been fairly competent. The other guy will have to cut someone regardless if I don't trade him...and I can get super lucky and have no one else pick up whomever he drops (I have one of the lowest waiver priorities). Secondarily, I have Gaskin on IR who I picked up a couple of weeks ago to try and take over my rb2 spot. I think he comes back this week (hoping so), and if he does, based on his production this year, if he heads into the same role, he should be a more than competent RB2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sad People Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 7 minutes ago, Forge said: On the surface, it seems crazy...but the net gain may actually work in my favor if I can get the QB. I'd lose probably 14 points per game by going from Adams to my bench WR. I'm rolling out Wentz and PJ Walker right now at ...it's really rough (though I do have Teddy B). People are getting 50 points form their QB & OP spots, and sometimes I'm lucky to get 30 (I got exactly 20 this week, last week I got 10...this is a problem). The WW is barren. He has to get rid of a QB because Hill will lose TE eligibility this week and he'll exceed the maximum roster spots for Qbs. So I'd add either Tannehill or Big Ben. My RB2 spot is also a major issue. This week I add Hyde minutes before kick off, but I have to cut him loose this week with Carson back. Otherwise I've been rolling with Duke Johnson. I'm going to try and get Dobbins this week (I think we may have finally crossed over for him yesterday), but he's out this week with Covid for sure. If Ekeler is outscoring my current RB2 by 8-10 points per game (easily doable given what I'm throwing out there), then I just need the QB to outscore my own QBs by about 4-6 per week to make this worth while, which isn't impossible. The only reason that I'm hesitating right now is Wentz has a weak schedule moving forward, so you'd figure he'd just accidentally fall into some good games, and Teddy has actually been fairly competent. The other guy will have to cut someone regardless if I don't trade him...and I can get super lucky and have no one else pick up whomever he drops (I have one of the lowest waiver priorities). Secondarily, I have Gaskin on IR who I picked up a couple of weeks ago to try and take over my rb2 spot. I think he comes back this week (hoping so), and if he does, based on his production this year, if he heads into the same role, he should be a more than competent RB2. If it was anyone else but a player coming off injury Id think about it,How much work will they give him in a lost year but that’s just me and how I view it. Adams stat line the past 5 games have been pretty darn good. Could you try and get their RB1 instead on Ekeler? But also if your cool with losing star talent and fantasy to help fill out your roster then by all means go for it. I got burned years back by trading star talent for Jamaal Charles coming off another knee injury so I’m not all thrilled about the idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.