plan9misfit Posted February 18, 2021 Share Posted February 18, 2021 1 hour ago, quiller said: I just want to know why SI thinks we need TWO edge rushers and ONE RB in our first 6 PICKS..... crazy. and YES I want to see us draft regular contributors in the draft at S, CB, DT, and LB. I would also like depth at OL. Mix our first 6 picks in these positions. What mock is that? It sounds....bizarre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quiller Posted February 18, 2021 Share Posted February 18, 2021 10 minutes ago, plan9misfit said: What mock is that? It sounds....bizarre. Sports Illustrated Dallas Cowboys 7 round mock draft 2.0 10-Slater OT 42 Basham JR Edge 74 Ford S 99 Taylor Jr CB 115 Jordan Smith Edge 139 Hubbard RB 179 Stills DT 193 Darden WR 236 Buechele QB... this is almost IMO our worst Nightmare.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WizardHawk Posted February 18, 2021 Share Posted February 18, 2021 5 minutes ago, quiller said: Sports Illustrated Dallas Cowboys 7 round mock draft 2.0 10-Slater OT 42 Basham JR Edge 74 Ford S 99 Taylor Jr CB 115 Jordan Smith Edge 139 Hubbard RB 179 Stills DT 193 Darden WR 236 Buechele QB... this is almost IMO our worst Nightmare.. Huge fan of Slater. After that....woof. That’s not good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rtnldave Posted February 18, 2021 Share Posted February 18, 2021 Looks as good an idea as the green new deal in Texas right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plan9misfit Posted February 18, 2021 Share Posted February 18, 2021 32 minutes ago, quiller said: Sports Illustrated Dallas Cowboys 7 round mock draft 2.0 10-Slater OT 42 Basham JR Edge 74 Ford S 99 Taylor Jr CB 115 Jordan Smith Edge 139 Hubbard RB 179 Stills DT 193 Darden WR 236 Buechele QB... this is almost IMO our worst Nightmare.. I don’t like that draft at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextyearfordaboyz Posted February 18, 2021 Share Posted February 18, 2021 11 hours ago, plan9misfit said: I don’t like that draft at all. Sports Illustrated is down the toilet, and the I’ve literally never heard of the guy who wrote it, Matthew Postins. I don’t think this is the type of thing we should be taking seriously. This would not be a good outcome. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plan9misfit Posted February 18, 2021 Share Posted February 18, 2021 3 hours ago, Nextyearfordaboyz said: Sports Illustrated is down the toilet, and the I’ve literally never heard of the guy who wrote it, Matthew Postins. I don’t think this is the type of thing we should be taking seriously. This would not be a good outcome. Amen to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextyearfordaboyz Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 Since we’ve been circling around the same topics and prospects for a month or so, here’s a little novel scenario: -Dak is re-signed -Gallup is traded for his equivalent at DT (Who? Not sure, but just pretend) -The QBs are of the board, as are Sewell, Slater, Farley, & Surtain -No reasonable trade down offers are available Give me your top 5 choices for #10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted February 20, 2021 Author Share Posted February 20, 2021 14 minutes ago, Nextyearfordaboyz said: Since we’ve been circling around the same topics and prospects for a month or so, here’s a little novel scenario: -Dak is re-signed -Gallup is traded for his equivalent at DT (Who? Not sure, but just pretend) -The QBs are of the board, as are Sewell, Slater, Farley, & Surtain -No reasonable trade down offers are available Give me your top 5 choices for #10. Pitts seems like the most logical choice. But I would note Hate Waddle. Speed on this Offense & a natural replacement for Gallup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextyearfordaboyz Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 42 minutes ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said: Pitts seems like the most logical choice. But I would note Hate Waddle. Speed on this Offense & a natural replacement for Gallup. I’d need to spend more time on the WR in the event they became a real option, but my initial thought would be: 1) Waddle 2) Pitts 3) Chase 4) Smith Waddle just adds such a perfect dimension to this offense that it doesn’t currently have, and Pitts is going to be a true matchup nightmare in the NFL. But I kind of think I would even take any of these 4 over Farley or Surtain if we traded Gallup away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WizardHawk Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 (edited) I don’t particularly like it, but the offensive value is far superior in this scenario. 1. Chase 2. Waddle 3. Smith 4. Pitts Can’t narrow down a 5th prospect right now, but Darrisaw, Vera-Tucker, Jaelan Phillips, and Moehrig would likely be in the mix. Push comes to shove and no trade down is available, I might....might, be willing to move #10 for future picks all together. Edited February 20, 2021 by WizardHawk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WizardHawk Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 JOK is in there too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plan9misfit Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 10. Kyle Pitts TE Florida 46. Tyson Campbell CB Georgia 75. Jevon Holland S Oregon 99. Marlon Tuipulotu DT USC 115. Monty Rice LB Georgia 120. Shaun Wade S Ohio State 138. Chuba Hubbard RB Oklahoma State 179. Anthony Schwartz WR Auburn 194. Alaric Jackson OT Iowa 226. Jonathon Cooper EDGE Ohio State Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted February 20, 2021 Author Share Posted February 20, 2021 Just now, plan9misfit said: 10. Kyle Pitts TE Florida 46. Tyson Campbell CB Georgia 75. Jevon Holland S Oregon 99. Marlon Tuipulotu DT USC 115. Monty Rice LB Georgia 120. Shaun Wade S Ohio State 138. Chuba Hubbard RB Oklahoma State 179. Anthony Schwartz WR Auburn 194. Alaric Jackson OT Iowa 226. Jonathon Cooper EDGE Ohio State Would not suck. Remember at the start of the season when Wade was considered CB1? Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted February 20, 2021 Author Share Posted February 20, 2021 1 hour ago, Nextyearfordaboyz said: I’d need to spend more time on the WR in the event they became a real option, but my initial thought would be: 1) Waddle 2) Pitts 3) Chase 4) Smith Waddle just adds such a perfect dimension to this offense that it doesn’t currently have, and Pitts is going to be a true matchup nightmare in the NFL. But I kind of think I would even take any of these 4 over Farley or Surtain if we traded Gallup away. If gallup is traded. It opens up a lot. We saw how explosive our offense was with CeeDee. No reason to not keep that up. Ideas we trade gallup for a CB. Sign a FS and DT in FA. And party with Pitts or Waddle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts