Jump to content

Tank for Trevor?


rf54

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RpMc said:

Wow, my mistake sir. 

 

******* Pete Davidson, what as ***!  Ariana and then Kate who is a massive upgrade from Ariana honestly.  What the hell, I mean honestly Pete Davidson?  I can see a Brad Pitt type with Kate Beckinsale or David Beckham, but is being a funny goof that important to gorgeous girls?  What Pete has tattoos and is a semi-drug addict so that is so sexy?  

 

Thank goodness Kate had more sense than that and probably ended it!  And wow she is 47 years old?  She looks like freaking 25 or something, her figure is out of this world amazing!

 

407aef3d582ab4cb2dc91ff5fdaaebf6.gif

 

 

AdoredShoddyBaboon-size_restricted.gif

 

Is there a better looking 47 year old girl on earth?  That would be hard to find one.  Damn she is in great shape, ok I am losing it, she is too hot I need to be done here... 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ozzy said:

Great reference, Kate Beckinsale is like a 10 easily, top 10 pretty women on earth that is, if not top 10 is 15-20 worst case scenario.

Who are the other woman ranked ahead of Kate? I want the complete top ten. And the post will be worthless without pictures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cearbhall said:

Who are the other woman ranked ahead of Kate? I want the complete top ten. And the post will be worthless without pictures.

That would be a tough task. I like Winona Ryder more than Kate. She's a year older at 48 but I've always had a thing for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mattyice0401 said:

Threads getting off topic  but I’ll bite this one time, but Selena Gomez is easily one of the baddest women on earth hands down. She’s way younger than Kate but Still bad

This post is worthless without pictures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Cearbhall said:

Who are the other woman ranked ahead of Kate? I want the complete top ten. And the post will be worthless without pictures.

It is hard to call, this is my list just based on female faces only.  Granted some have changed over the years and the list is not always what they are now but what they once were for a long period of time.  Looks are fleeting of course so again it is hard.  Is based on overall face composition, nose, lips, eyes specifically off of a profile look or in reference to portrait composition.  

 

 

 

 

Avril Lavigne:
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTKZ6ayG-gK5L5A68jOzPy6zq3SnXIsCkNjvGJDIO5ttqkQPNyy-Qa021f264bb12bd4f84bd84f0bb23712f.jpg

 
 
Gal Gadot:
450?cb=20180811005357
 
 
Natalie Portman:
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS67dUSt2f3jEbkRihc6li
 
 
Emma Watson: 
emma-watson-beautiful-wallpaper.jpg?resi
 
 
 

Shania Twain
5489630fe91e9_-_rbk-shania-twain-head-sh

 

 

 
Lily Cole
7d680ea65aecda0f4482b4254124998e.jpg

 

 

Heidi Klum: 
547f1ced7e8d9_-_rbk-heidi-klum-0610-2-pp
 
 
 
 
Penelope Cruz
penelope_cruz.jpg
 
 
 
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRriTC6o0WUS1tXT7m4b0UZO2ca9je3Yk7Vrqe-U4MwniB4lFXCKate Beckinsale
c8a589a7901ed50348ee58b100cf8251.jpg
 
 
 
Zooey Deschanel: 
0f45cc82a2e70429db46ca587bdadfd9.jpg
 
 
 
 
Candice Swanepoel
53d4d3b693175_-_030913-max-factor-whippe


Megan Fox:
actress-megan-fox-arrives-at-the-70th-an
 
 
 
 
Olivia Wilde: 
1101-olivia-wilde-1446697801.jpg?resize=
 



Hayley Williams:
 
2686029238_60cd781255_z.jpg
 
 
 
 
Alexis Bledel
awB02ER_460s.jpg
 
 
 
Mette Lindberg
the-asteroids-galaxy-tour.jpeg
 
 
 
 
Stacey Dash:
9e3510eac2c2ad3c9e3c5d7f0480a928.jpg



Kristen Stewart:
rs_600x600-191120154824-600.kristen-stew
 
 
 
Selena Gomez
28-selena-gomez-by-the-balcony-325x485.j
 

 
 
Taylor Swift:
18839f21-608b-4acd-a2aa-a944db3e15e7-206
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
If it was just on face and body combo girls like Candice would be way higher, and it would help Kate as well, her face combined with her amazing figure and toned body she would be higher on the list no question  Gal Gadot is hard to argue with total package though same with Heidi etc.  
 
Candice-Swanepoel-316.jpg
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kristina Pimenova could be on the list but she is still a child in many ways, but obviously her looks will change the more she gets older.
 
girlmodel11.jpg
Above as a child 
 
 
 
 
Below when she is a little older, still going to be gorgeous though obviously
8f25dd2e982f18fac338a339d9ccff71.jpg
 
 
 
 
Again all of this here on the list is based on facial composition and distance between the jaw line, lips, to the nose and the eyes, eyebrows etc.  Overall symmetry and attractiveness of the face based on what I view it as through years of experience as a portrait artist.  Interestingly enough, a girls nose is a massive point of beauty that everything revolves around overall and it is not luck that many of the noses are very similar in shape.  But of course beauty is always in the eye of the beholder.  If one takes into account current day beauty of all of these ladies, yes Kate again would help her cause once more based on how great she still looks right now overall.  In their prime many of these ladies were just knockouts that lasted for years and years.  
Edited by Ozzy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, JDBrocks said:

What are we doing here guys? We have a thread in this forum for off topic/non-football stuff AND an entire forum dedicated to threads about non-football talk. 

It was late so they just derailed the thread a bit.  For the record, of the women of my age, it's hard to beat Beckinsale, Gabrielle Union and Alyssa Milano.

Edited by swede700
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, VikeManDan said:

Washington benching Haskins.

That move today clearly means they're going to go after one of the QBs next year and they've already moved on from Haskins (which is one team that will have a top-10 pick that I expected would take a QB).  While I've never been high on Haskins, the Washington franchise has done to him what they did to Jason Campbell.  In 13 games, he's had to play for 3 different HCs.  

Edited by swede700
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, swede700 said:

That move today clearly means they're going to go after one of the QBs next year and they've already moved on from Haskins (which is one team that will have a top-10 pick that I expected would take a QB).  While I've never been high on Haskins, the Washington franchise has done to him what they did to Jason Campbell.  In 13 games, he's had to play for 3 different HCs.  

Almost sounds like a Josh Rosen 2.0 situation with all the jerking around in a way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, VikeManDan said:

Almost sounds like a Josh Rosen 2.0 situation with all the jerking around in a way. 

Both situations were egregious, even though I never thought much of either player...but this was even worse, considering they drafted Haskins at a time when the HC was already on the hot seat.  At least in Arizona, they anticipated that Wilks would be around for awhile...they never expected him to be that bad.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...