Jump to content

WFT vs Cardinals: Who has the most sacks in week 2?


offbyone

WFT vs Cardinals: Who has the most sacks in week 2?  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. Which player has the most sacks in week 2?

    • Ryan Kerrigan
    • Chase Young
    • Montez Sweat
    • Matt Ioannidis
      0
    • Chandler Jones
    • Zach Allen
      0


Recommended Posts

I had to go with Chandler Jones. 

Working on that left side of the OL, I think he’s the best bet to collect multiple sacks in the game. I think WFT’s pass rush, collectively, will have more impact on the game — but I think they’ll be spreading the wealth, and I think Jones will have the most individual production.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
34 minutes ago, turtle28 said:

Montez Sweat continues to look awesome on the outside and Allen has been a lot more active in the middle this year, they both look the best TBH.

Yep.  Sweat was starting to earn the bust label last year and now he is looking his draft position was a steal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, offbyone said:

Yep.  Sweat was starting to earn the bust label last year and now he is looking his draft position was a steal.

I don’t think Sweat was ever in bust territory. He was a starter as a rookie and I don’t know why anyone would call a rookie a bust after 1/2 of their rookie season. Even so, he played the run well as a rookie and did have 2 sacks the first half of his rookie season. Then, the second half of Sweat’s rookie season he had 5 sacks.
 

If people were looking to call him a bust after 1/2 of his rookie season, they were just being ridiculous. Some people always want to call players a bust too for some reason which I’ve always felt was weird, it’s like they enjoy hating on the player.

Edited by turtle28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, turtle28 said:

I don’t think Sweat was ever in bust territory. He was a starter as a rookie and I don’t know why anyone would call a rookie a bust after 1/2 of their rookie season. Even so, he played the run well as a rookie and did have 2 sacks the first half of his rookie season. Then, the second half of Sweat’s rookie season he had 5 sacks.
 

If people were looking to call him a bust after 1/2 of his rookie season, they were just being ridiculous. Some people always want to call players a bust too for some reason which I’ve always felt was weird, it’s like they enjoy hating on the player.

Well I was pretty unimpressed by him last year.  I think bust is relative.  Sure he was passable, but he didn't perform as one would expect for a top 20 pick.  Anyways, my point was just that he looks like a different player this year in a good way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, offbyone said:

Well I was pretty unimpressed by him last year.  I think bust is relative.  Sure he was passable, but he didn't perform as one would expect for a top 20 pick.  Anyways, my point was just that he looks like a different player this year in a good way.

Again, he had 5 sacks in the final 8 games. That’s pretty good for a rookie or really any DL - no it’s not elite but it’s far from “unimpressive.” 

Agree he definitely looks better this year, I think a lot of that has to do with strength and obviously coaching. It’s clear he’s stronger, so when he doesn’t blow by LTs - which won’t happen every play - now he can also overpower him. I think the coaching has improved his technique and his counter moves. I love what I’m seeing from him.

Also, just for the record Sweat was drafted #26 overall, not in the top 20.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...