RaidersAreOne Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted November 11, 2019 Author Share Posted November 11, 2019 Is there an echo in here.... That's pretty incredible, to be fair. It's insane. The playoff performance doesn't stack up to the likes of Tom or Aaron's first attempts there but can't argue with the above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 5 hours ago, RaidersAreOne said: Jimmy G after 16 starts: Wins - 14 Rating - 95.2 Yards per attempt: 8.29 Completion % - 66.67% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhanYouDigIt Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 Gotta be the back injury. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 9 hours ago, RaidersAreOne said: These cherry picked stats can be easily beaten by a myriad of QBs, excluding the rush yards. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 (edited) 5 hours ago, Forge said: Jimmy G after 16 starts: Wins - 14 Rating - 95.2 Yards per attempt: 8.29 Completion % - 66.67% Pretty sure Wilson, Dak and RG3 would also compete with those numbers. Just looked it up: Wilson beats Jackson in Rating, cmp %, YPA - loses in wins and total yards RG3 beats Jackson in rating, comp, YPA - loses in wins and total yeards Dak beats Jackson in rating, comp%, YPA, wins*, almost ties him in overall yardage *I excluded the season finale of 2016. Dak played 2 series and then Romo came in. We were sitting players for the playoffs. Edited November 12, 2019 by Matts4313 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wackywabbit Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 47 minutes ago, Matts4313 said: These cherry picked stats can be easily beaten by a myriad of QBs, excluding the rush yards. I get your point on some of them, but a 21-22 year old QB in his first 16 starts going 13-3 with 1250 rushing yards and more than capable passing, is nothing short of amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 (edited) Edited November 12, 2019 by .Buzz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeotheLion Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 5 minutes ago, .Buzz said: The defense has given up 30 points since acquiring Ramsey... It's not a coincidence. The scheme change has lifted the whole team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.10.E Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 9 hours ago, LeotheLion said: The defense has given up 30 points since acquiring Ramsey... It's not a coincidence. The scheme change has lifted the whole team. Or you played the Falcons, Bengals and Steelers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucsfan333 Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 (edited) Russel Wilson is 6-0 against teams that are 8 games above .500! Edited November 12, 2019 by ITS_RAMMY_PLAYBOI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeotheLion Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 13 minutes ago, M.10.E said: Or you played the Falcons, Bengals and Steelers. I didn't realize the Falcons were a bad offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.10.E Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 1 minute ago, LeotheLion said: I didn't realize the Falcons were a bad offense. The Falcons are a bad everything this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeotheLion Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 9 minutes ago, M.10.E said: The Falcons are a bad everything this year. 10 was tied for their lowest point total for the season. They scored above 20 in 6/8 excluding the Rams game. That's not a bad offense. The Bengals/Steelers point total was each team's 2nd lowest output for the season. I don't really care what teams they are, if you are holding a team to their bottom 2 output in week 10 then it is significant. Also all 3 were road/neutral site games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts