JAF-N72EX Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 (edited) 15 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said: @JustAnotherFan Do you have a website or a place where your stats are viewable? The stats that I use are from a few different sites combined with my own, and unfortunately the two main sites are paid subs(FO & SIS). I've been using their sites for quite awhile, especially FO. Roughly 10 years or so? Overall, I like looking at advance stats from other sites, but I like to check the validity of them even more by using my own eyes so that I can see where exactly they got there numbers from. That's why I do my own research. Each person sees things differently. For instance, the individual pressure stats that I used earlier in this thread were by SIS and so I've started to go through every pass play by every team just to check and see if I'm seeing the same thing as they are. I also did the same thing with their team offense/defense pressure rate % in '15 and '16 and came away pretty impressed by them with how close our numbers matched up when I used their very same criteria - which I personally like as it helps weed out which teams' front 7 are simply getting credit for coverage sacks. Quote Pressure rate accounts for all pass plays including scrambles but not including spikes. Plays cancelled by Defensive Pass Interference are also included. Plays count as having pressure in the following situations: a) any pass or scramble charted with pressure by a specific defender, or "overall pressure", b) any sack charted as "rusher untouched," "blown block," or "overall pressure", c) any sack charted as "coverage sack" or "failed scramble," but only if these sacks are also charted with a specific defender giving pass pressure. (For example, a "coverage sack" can also have pressure if a specific defender forces the quarterback out of the pocket immediately, but the sack takes a lot longer because of the coverage.) Edited October 5, 2017 by JustAnotherFan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakuvious Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Football Outsiders currently has the Chiefs with the league's best run blocking offensive line and the league's worst pass blocking offensive line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onejayhawk Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 50 minutes ago, Jakuvious said: Football Outsiders currently has the Chiefs with the league's best run blocking offensive line and the league's worst pass blocking offensive line. You could have posted the tweet here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onejayhawk Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 (edited) 18 hours ago, onejayhawk said: Here it is. It comes courtesy of BJ Kissel of Chiefs dot com who ran the numbers on the quarterbacks the Chiefs have faced this year. This is how the four quarterbacks the Chiefs have faced this year (Tom Brady, Carson Wentz, Philip Rivers and Kirk Cousins) have fared playing against the Chiefs and against everyone else: vs. Chiefs: 51%, 4 TDs, 4 INTs vs. everyone else: 68%, 25 TDs, 3 INTs https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2017/10/5/16429438/kansas-city-chiefs-defense-turns-good-quarterbacks-into-bad-quarterbacks J Edited October 6, 2017 by onejayhawk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soko Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 1 hour ago, Jakuvious said: Football Outsiders currently has the Chiefs with the league's best run blocking offensive line and the league's worst pass blocking offensive line. I’m sure having a great running back/QB that has so-so pocket presence, has something to do with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danand Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 On 3/10/2017 at 8:00 PM, marshawn lynch said: Rookie S Malik Hooker leading NFL in INTs Rookie CB Tredavious White leading NFL in passes defensed. The hype of the DB class so far seems to be real. It was obvious this was the deepest position entering the draft and its proving to be true so far. Marlon Humphrey played surprisingly well for the Ravens. Gives up a couple of catches, but has also been great efforts from receivers. Puts my criticism/worries about him to shame thus far. Ravens allow a really really low YPA when he is in the game, which most likely though is a coincidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iamcanadian Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 People have to remember that losing teams in the SB usually have miserable seasons the following year. See: Carolina. I see the same fate for Atlanta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iamcanadian Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 I think you may be able to add Dak to the list. Everything was easy for him last year with Elliott carrying the load, but I am not seeing a QB who can carry a team on his back. Not at all sure, he really is a franchise QB??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlaqOptic Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 On 10/3/2017 at 2:37 PM, cddolphin said: He would be your #1. He would be every team's number #1, unless you are a Pittsburgh or Atlanta fan. Or New York. Or Tampa Bay. Or Cincinnati. Like come on. Dude doesn't even have an 1,000 yard season to his name but he's better than All-Pro Receivers?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cddolphin Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 5 minutes ago, BlaqOptic said: Or New York. Or Tampa Bay. Or Cincinnati. Like come on. Dude doesn't even have an 1,000 yard season to his name but he's better than All-Pro Receivers?! He's certainly performed better or at the very least comparably this season, outside of maybe Brown, and from watching him through the first 4 games this season I could see him having a legitimate argument over those other guys you listed over the next couple seasons. I'm officially on the bandwagon. Doesn't he lead the league in yards, TDs, and YPC over the last 6 regular season games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKTexans Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 10 hours ago, BlaqOptic said: Or New York. Or Tampa Bay. Or Cincinnati. Like come on. Dude doesn't even have an 1,000 yard season to his name but he's better than All-Pro Receivers?! Nuk is debatable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVillain112 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Woof... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cddolphin Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 4 minutes ago, TheVillain112 said: Woof... Why do people cite QBR.. I'm sure there's a drop off but c'mon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, cddolphin said: Why do people cite QBR.. I'm sure there's a drop off but c'mon Barnwell is an ESPN guy. Pretty sure that they have to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVillain112 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 5 minutes ago, cddolphin said: Why do people cite QBR.. I'm sure there's a drop off but c'mon Ah, didn't even notice it was the dreaded QBR. Eh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts