Jump to content

Week 4 GDT: Bills (3-0) @ Raiders (2-1)


NYRaider

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, BackinBlack said:

I dont agree with this. 
KC took Pat mahommes, and let him sit a year, to groom him to be there franchise qb. 
That is one very obvious, if you need more, Ill let you know more haha. 

maybe when it comes to players outside of QBs, but, whenever someone trades up, and uses mult picks to do it, I beleive they are thinking more than 5 years. 

QBs perhaps, but not other positions, especially RB. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BackinBlack said:

I dont agree with this. 
KC took Pat mahommes, and let him sit a year, to groom him to be there franchise qb. 
That is one very obvious, if you need more, Ill let you know more haha. 

maybe when it comes to players outside of QBs, but, whenever someone trades up, and uses mult picks to do it, I beleive they are thinking more than 5 years. 

The good ones are build for the future just look at the NE, Pitt, Baltimore and KC. It's all about consistency. You know what system you're running for 5+ years so you can draft players for your future.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Sunday gets closer I continue to force myself to thinking the Raiders will win this game. This is a sick disease.

If Trent Brown dosen't play then I don't know why the Raiders just didn't put on the short term IR. 

Edited by agarcia34
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, agarcia34 said:

If you're asking for fantasy reasons i would say take the chance and play him. Just based off how bad the bills been against slot WR's

Right on I’ve got him in my flex this week due to some injuries and COVID so I’m hoping to get some production. Looking at his past stats, when he gets targets he produces. Combine that with how poorly the Bills have covered the slot I think this bodes well for Hunter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised CBS stations in Northern California are still televising Raiders games when they're able to.

You think with the move these stations would have changed their loyalty to the Chargers, now the only AFC team in California. Instead, they have only carried the Chargers when there is no conflict with the Raiders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pf9 said:

I'm surprised CBS stations in Northern California are still televising Raiders games when they're able to.

You think with the move these stations would have changed their loyalty to the Chargers, now the only AFC team in California. Instead, they have only carried the Chargers when there is no conflict with the Raiders.

you might have had a point if the Chargers had any type of fan base in Cali. Raiders roots are deep in Oakland, and as much as anyone hates to admit it, will be that way for a long time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...