Danger 5,941 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 28 minutes ago, EaglesPeteC said: Keep the smoke screen up that you want to take a QB get a haul for pick 6 with an extra first next year. Start Hurts for a year and build around him in this draft. If Hurts isn't the guy, you have 3 firsts to go get your guy in 2021. PROFIT idk man. I'm just not sold on any QBs in 2022 at this point. The best out there right now is Sam Howell and he's not super inspiring. Maybe there'll be a riser, but the QB class looks disappointing at this point in time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EaglesPeteC 8,167 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Danger said: idk man. I'm just not sold on any QBs in 2022 at this point. The best out there right now is Sam Howell and he's not super inspiring. Maybe there'll be a riser, but the QB class looks disappointing at this point in time. This is assuming Wilson goes at 2 and someone trades up for 3 for Fields. I would rather this plan than Trey Lance 100/100. 1 year of FBS starting in mostly a QB running based system. I'd rather take the trade back and see what I got in Hurts rather than draft maybe a slightly better Hurts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kiltman 2,543 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Danger said: idk man. I'm just not sold on any QBs in 2022 at this point. The best out there right now is Sam Howell and he's not super inspiring. Maybe there'll be a riser, but the QB class looks disappointing at this point in time. There looks to be a decent field of QBs who could rise more. Howell is like a Mighty Kids Meal version of Baker Mayfield. But after him you have a pretty decent list of potential risers. More guys than this year. Right now Wilson, Fields, Lance probably would be near the top if you combined the classes. But some of those guys could easily change that. Lots of athleticism next year. Also worst case, we make a trade next year for a vet. No guarantees the Watson stuff goes through this year. You have Rodgers and Wilson potentially continuing being annoyed by their teams. If we had 3 firsts any trade is possible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Danger 5,941 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 57 minutes ago, EaglesPeteC said: This is assuming Wilson goes at 2 and someone trades up for 3 for Fields. I would rather this plan than Trey Lance 100/100. 1 year of FBS starting in mostly a QB running based system. I'd rather take the trade back and see what I got in Hurts rather than draft maybe a slightly better Hurts. I'm all for Wilson or Fields if they drop to 6, or Lance if we trade back to say... 9-11 and he's still around. Don't give up any more assets to get a guy this year IMO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.