Jump to content

Simulated Mock Drafts


RedGold

Recommended Posts

From what I have seen, I would not count on getting Walker Little at #63. 

New week, new lists.

31: R1 P31 EDGE Gregory Rousseau - Miami
63: R2 P31 OT Walker Little - Stanford
94: R3 P30 EDGE Dayo Odeyingbo - Vanderbilt
136: R4 P31 S Hamsah Nasirildeen - Florida State
144: R4 P39 WR Tamorrion Terry - Florida State
175: R5 P31 WR Dazz Newsome - North Carolina
181: R5 P37 TE Kenny Yeboah - Mississippi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thedraftnetwork

31  Samuel Cosmi, OT, Texas; starting LT

63  Elijah Molden, CB, Washington

94  Anthony Schwartz, WR, Auburn; starting WR

136  Dylan Moses, LB, Alabama; starting MLB

144  Daelin Hayes, EDGE, Notre Dame; starting EDGE

175  Darrick Forrest, S, Cincinnati; replacement for Daniel Sorensen, EDGE sub., LB sub.

181  Wyatt Hubert, EDGE, Kansas State; Sub at EDGE, sub pass rusher; Chiefs have interviewed him multiple times

 

Edited by mayanfootball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Draft Utopia

31: R1 P31 EDGE Jayson Oweh - Penn State
63: R2 P31 OT Jalen Mayfield - Michigan
94: R3 P30  LB Cameron McGrone - Michigan
136: R4 P31 C Drake Jackson - Kentucky
144: R4 P39 WR Seth Williams - Auburn
175: R5 P31 WR Dazz Newsome - North Carolina
181: R5 P37 OT Stone Forsythe - Florida
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TRADE UP DRAFT

thedraftnetwork

Received from Carolina

Round 1, Pick 8, Rashawn Slater, OT, Northwestern

Sent to Carolina

Round 1, Pick 31;  Round 5,Pick 181;             Round 1, 2022 Draft;  Round 4, 2022 Draft

 

8  Rashawn Slater, OT, Northwestern; plug 'n play LT

63  Elijah Molden, CB, Washington; starter CB

94  Anthony Schwartz, WR, Auburn; starter WR

136  Dylan Moses, LB, Alabama; starter MLB

144  Daelin Hayes, EDGE, Notre Dame; starter LDE, LB

175  Darrick Forrest, S, Cincinnati; eventual replacement for Dan Sorensen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not close to enough to trade up that far. What you offer might tempt New England at #15.

You need to add #63 and #94 to make it balance, but you get to keep the 4th and 5th round picks and get change back. That's #31, #63, #94, and 2022 1st for #8 and #151.

Using future 1st or 2nd round picks is cheating.

Slater is not a plug and play LT. Many think he is best inside, like AVT, but Pro-Bowl there. If you want LT, go with Sewell or Darrisaw. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TRADE UP DRAFT; thedraftnetwork; for those of you who would rather have Darrisaw than Slater.

 

Received, 2021 Draft, Pick 10, from DALLAS

Christian Darrisaw, OT, Virginia Tech

 

Sent, 2021 Draft, Pick 31, Pick 181, Pick 207; 2022 Draft, 1st.rd pick, 5th.rd pick

 

10  Christian Darrisaw, OT, Virginia Tech

63  Carlos Basham Jr., EDGE, Wake Forest

94  Cameron McGrone, LB, Michigan

136  Ambry Thomas, CB, Michigan

144 Joshua Bledsoe, S
175 A. Schwartz, WR
Edited by mayanfootball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trades are ridiculous, though this is not as bad as the last one. All you need to add our 2nd round pick. Just to be clear, #31, #63 and 2022 1st puts you in the ballpark. Just take off Basham and you have an accurate draft.

1 hour ago, mayanfootball said:

Really? LOL. C'mon man, you just don't like the idea of KC trading up.

I have no problem with trading up. But, I do like realistic trades, and these are not close. 

2 hours ago, mayanfootball said:

LOL.......It's done all the time in the real world. Get over it. I think it's fair.

This is not the real world. These are mock drafts. You are using future picks to get free stuff, which is cheating. I can deal with it if it's late picks to smooth a rough edge, but you want an extra first round pick. Cheating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, onejayhawk said:

The trades are ridiculous,

Not so. KC is giving as well as getting.

1 hour ago, onejayhawk said:

But, I do like realistic trades, and these are not close. 

You should put out your own "realistic" trade up mock. Don't bother responding to my Mock Drafts anymore, please? I know where your head is at already.

1 hour ago, onejayhawk said:

but you want an extra first round pick.

Who is getting an extra 1st.rd.pick? Certainly not KC whose giving up 2 1st. rd. picks in all the Trade Up mocks i've done.

Edited by mayanfootball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mayanfootball said:

Not so. KC is giving as well as getting.

You should put out your own "realistic" trade up mock. Don't bother responding anymore, please? I know where your head is at already.

Who is getting an extra 1st.rd.pick? Certainly not KC whose giving up 2 1st. rd. picks in all the Trade Up mocks i've done.

The Chiefs are not giving as well as they are getting. You vastly undervalue the higher pick. There are a bazillion trade value charts, but this one has the current team placements.
https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp?RequestTeam=car

Future picks value as a round lower, so a 2022 1st round pick values as pick #48. So, our 1st pick this year plus our 2022 1st is worth about #16. You have a trade in which it gets #8, with only minor tweaks. 

You are the one getting the free 1st round pick, to use in your trades. It isn't even our 1st pick. If you are going to steal, then steal something better, right? It's why all your trade up mocks stink.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade up draft.
#31 and #63 for #19.
#136, #181, 5th in 2022 for #115

At #19 I had the choice of Darrisaw, Jenkins, Basham, AVT, and J O-K, among others. If we had stayed put, we could have had Rousseau and Radunz.

19: R1 P19  OT Christian Darrisaw - Virginia Tech
94: R3 P30 EDGE Dayo Odeyingbo - Vanderbilt
115: R4 P10 OT Stone Forsythe - Florida
144: R4 P39 S Hamsah Nasirildeen - Florida State
175: R5 P31 WR Dazz Newsome - North Carolina
Edited by onejayhawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...