Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
SpeightTheVillain

Comparing Current Teams to Teams in History

Recommended Posts

I have been working on a project that compares teams as they sit in the current NFL landscape to how teams performed in history (as of now it only goes back to 2001) and thought you all might be interested in seeing the results. It works as follows:

I take four metrics: 1. DVOA (as provided by Football Outsiders).

                                  2. Pythagorean Wins ((Points for^2.37)/(Points For^2.37+Points Against^2.37)*16)

                                  3. Passer Rating Differential (Team Passer Rating - Opponent Passer Rating)

                                  4. Turnover Margin Per Game (TO Margin / Games Played).

I then normalize each metric to a score from 0 to 100 for each individual season, allowing every team since 2001 to be plotted on a 4-dimensional graph. I then find a current team and find the closest historical comparison. Any comparison not within 15 values on the graph is disregarded as too attenuated ( the closer on the graph, the more similar).

The results are as follows (distance on the graph in parentheses):

NFC North

Minnesota Vikings - 2019 Tampa Bay Buccaneers (9)

Green Bay Packers - 2006 Jacksonville Jaguars (5)

Detroit Lions - 2003 Washington Football Team (4)

Chicago Bears - 2012 New Orleans Saints (5)

NFC East

Dallas Cowboys - 2003 Buffalo Bills (6)

Philadelphia Eagles - No Team Within 15 Values

New York Giants - 2001 Dallas Cowboys (3)

Washington Football Team - 2007 New York Jets (5)

NFC South

Atlanta Falcons - 2003 Detroit Lions (4)

Carolina Panthers - 2006 New York Jets & 2013 Pittsburgh Steelers (Tied)(6)

New Orleans Saints - 2006 New York Giants & 2004 Cincinnati Bengals (Tied)(8)

Tampa Bay Buccaneers - 2002 Miami Dolphins (3)

NFC West

Arizona Cardinals - No Team Within 15 Values

Seattle Seahawks - 2006 Philadelphia Eagles (3)

San Francisco 49ers - 2019 Los Angeles Rams (5)

LA Rams - 2013 Denver Broncos (6)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AFC North

Cleveland Browns - 2013 Detroit Lions (3)

Cincinnati Bengals - No Team Within 15 Values

Baltimore Ravens - 2005 Chicago Bears (8)

Pittsburgh Steelers - 2006 Jacksonville Jaguars (8)

AFC East

Buffalo Bills - 2008 Houston Texans (4)

Miami Dolphins - 2013 Arizona Cardinals (6)

New York Jets - 2001 Carolina Panthers (4)

New England Patriots - No Team Within 15 Values

AFC South

Jacksonville Jaguars - 2008 Seattle Seahawks (6)

Indianapolis Colts - 2008 Carolina Panthers (4)

Houston Texans - 2002 Washington Football Team (8)

Tennessee Titans - No Team Within 15 Values

AFC West

Denver Broncos - No Team Within 15 Values

Kansas City Chiefs - 2005 Jacksonville Jaguars (5)

LA Chargers - 2002 Buffalo Bills (8)

Las Vegas Raiders - No Team Within 15 Values

Edited by SpeightTheVillain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"

2. Pythagorean Wins ((Points for^2.37)/(Points For^2.37+Points Against^2.37)*16)"

Can you explain this further?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said:

"

2. Pythagorean Wins ((Points for^2.37)/(Points For^2.37+Points Against^2.37)*16)"

Can you explain this further?

Quote

Pythagorean expectation is a sports analytics formula devised by Bill James to estimate the percentage of games a baseball team "should" have won based on the number of runs they scored and allowed. Comparing a team's actual and Pythagorean winning percentage can be used to make predictions and evaluate which teams are over-performing and under-performing. The name comes from the formula's resemblance to the Pythagorean theorem

Quote

Although Football Outsiders Almanac acknowledges that the formula had been less-successful in picking Super Bowl participants from 2005–2008, it reasserted itself in 2009 and 2010. Furthermore, "[t]he Pythagorean projection is also still a valuable predictor of year-to-year improvement. Teams that win a minimum of one full game more than their Pythagorean projection tend to regress the following year; teams that win a minimum of one full game less than their Pythagoerean projection tend to improve the following year, particularly if they were at or above .500 despite their underachieving.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_expectation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate you doing this. I want a breakdown on why Cleveland matches up with Detroit.

 

Also, how much does the week 1 blowout skew their numbers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, candyman93 said:

 

Also, how much does the week 1 blowout skew their numbers?

At this point, probably a lot. They are average in the first 3 categories and slightly above average in turnover margin per game.

The next closest teams are 2019 Pittsburgh and 2004 Seattle

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...