Jump to content
incognito_man

Weak 7 Game Day Thread: @ Houston

Best Ty or Tyler of this game?  

31 members have voted

  1. 1. Best Ty or Tyler of this game?



Recommended Posts

It's hard to know how good or bad the WR's other than Adams actually are when Rodgers has such tunnel vision for Adams.  When Adams is targeted 16 times while all other WR's combined have 7 targets (and apparently 2 of them were throw aways) there is more to it than just talent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

our coverage today was a bit off. A lot of that probably has to do with the ineptitude of the IDL as a whole, but the zone assignments seemed really off today IMO. Raven Greene had an up-n-down day in this area in particular; looked kinda sluggish out there when having to change direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

Not sure what the point is here. Our OL is pretty deep? You're going to beat teams like the Texans with this WR core. You're not going to beat teams like TB, SF, Seattle, etc with that crew because they can lock down on 17 and other than maybe Lazard you don't have another guy who can beat his man. That's the point. You're not making a move at WR so you can go 11-5. You're making the move so you can get to the ship. That's the goal here right? 

We can beat Seattle with this crew.  Their defense is terrible.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

Not sure what the point is here. Our OL is pretty deep? You're going to beat teams like the Texans with this WR core. You're not going to beat teams like TB, SF, Seattle, etc with that crew because they can lock down on 17 and other than maybe Lazard you don't have another guy who can beat his man. That's the point. You're not making a move at WR so you can go 11-5. You're making the move so you can get to the ship. That's the goal here right? 

The difference between us winning a Super Bowl and us going 11-5 (never mind we won a SB at 10-6...) is a WR another team doesn’t want?

BTW shout out to Gute for building a deep team that can withstand the amount of injuries we’ve had so far. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mazrimiv said:

It's hard to know how good or bad the WR's other than Adams actually are when Rodgers has such tunnel vision for Adams.  When Adams is targeted 16 times while all other WR's combined have 7 targets (and apparently 2 of them were throw aways) there is more to it than just talent.

I also saw a couple plays where MVS was running drags fairly open but Rodgers went to Adam's on both of them. I think one was the big TD. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, KFP7 said:

We can beat Seattle with this crew.  Their defense is terrible.

Can we beat the Bears with this crew?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Joe said:

our coverage today was a bit off. A lot of that probably has to do with the ineptitude of the IDL as a whole, but the zone assignments seemed really off today IMO. Raven Greene had an up-n-down day in this area in particular; looked kinda sluggish out there when having to change direction.

I thought the D line had a pretty good day. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, KFP7 said:

We can beat Seattle with this crew.  Their defense is terrible.

Maybe with Lazard in there at least.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

Not sure what the point is here. Our OL is pretty deep? You're going to beat teams like the Texans with this WR core. You're not going to beat teams like TB, SF, Seattle, etc with that crew because they can lock down on 17 and other than maybe Lazard you don't have another guy who can beat his man. That's the point. You're not making a move at WR so you can go 11-5. You're making the move so you can get to the ship. That's the goal here right? 

Turner-Jenkins-Linsley-Patrick-Wagner is a WAY WAY WAY bigger problem than Adams-Lazard-MVS

When Rodgers decides he's going to throw to the other receivers, they've been fine. It's when Adams is the only one that he looks at, that this offense has the propensity to stall out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Mr. Fussnputz said:

Can we beat the Bears with this crew?

yep, at least once. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, AlexGreen#20 said:

Turner-Jenkins-Linsley-Patrick-Wagner is a WAY WAY WAY bigger problem than Adams-Lazard-MVS

When Rodgers decides he's going to throw to the other receivers, they've been fine. It's when Adams is the only one that he looks at, that this offense has the propensity to stall out. 

MVS is back to looking totally lost out there. The guy couldn't ask for more opportunity than he's gotten the last 5 weeks and he's totally **** the bed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, deathstar said:

The difference between us winning a Super Bowl and us going 11-5 (never mind we won a SB at 10-6...) is a WR another team doesn’t want?

BTW shout out to Gute for building a deep team that can withstand the amount of injuries we’ve had so far. 

Along the OL maybe, but look at that DL. The IDL should've dominated Houston's OL, which is considered to be one of their major weaknesses outside Tunsil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Mr. Fussnputz said:

Can we beat the Bears with this crew?

Defense should be able to hold the Bears in check so we shouldn't need 30.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Joe said:

Along the OL maybe, but look at that DL. The IDL should've dominated Houston's OL, which is considered to be one of their major weaknesses outside Tunsil.

The run defense was good and we got pressure, historically both of those things aren’t true if our IDL isn’t playing well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, deathstar said:

The run defense was good and we got pressure, historically both of those things aren’t true if our IDL isn’t playing well.

Again, against a lower tiered OL. I'm not sure what part of we should have dominated this OL you don't understand. I'm not denying what happened, but the story of the day should've been how we shut their offense down, maybe even shut them out altogether; especially with the level of EDGE play we've had the past two seasons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...