CriminalMind Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 49 minutes ago, Purplexing said: ...What happens after two (-ish) weeks? What I meant is I don't think he'll be automatically activated, I think teams have 3 weeks after pup to activate\ir player, so I could see 2 week's getting him in to game shape. And I don't think his first game will be London, but I didn't check the schedule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vike daddy Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 1 hour ago, Purplexing said: Why make a new Ted thread? once again, our mods appear to have no problem with it. just let them direct traffic around here. too many cooks in the kitchen spoil the lutefisk, you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 There's no reason to activate him after 2-ish weeks. as the 3rd week is the bye week...take the full 3 weeks. Activate him as the primary backup for the Redskins game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelKing728 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 I think he'll be fully ready after the bye, but it may depend on the record and if Bradford's knee continues to have issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 I think having Teddy suit up and standing on the sideline gives the whole team an emotional lift. Even if he's number 3 on the depth chart. I'd think he'd be ready to be number 2 on the depth chart after the bye week. Just seeing him in pads wearing number 5 would be exciting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelKing728 Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 I'm guessing his contract won't toll. If he plays, and plays well, what kind of contract extension will he get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitty18 Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 I realize Bradford's knee is out of his control, but he is really shooting himself in the foot as far as getting a contract extension. I think a fully healthy Bradford is better than a fully healthy Teddy, but it seems that Bradford is continuing with his old injury prone ways. At this point, I'd give the job to Teddy until he screws it up. Maybe take a flyer QB in the draft this year and let Bradford go. IDK. Just thinking out loud at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 7 hours ago, SteelKing728 said: I'm guessing his contract won't toll. If he plays, and plays well, what kind of contract extension will he get? I’d do a one year “prove it” type contract for 2018, with a multi-year, top 15 type money team option attached to it. 1 year, $15M (I think that’s what his 5th year option would have been close too), with a 5 year $100M team option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klomp Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 7 hours ago, SemperFeist said: I’d do a one year “prove it” type contract for 2018, with a multi-year, top 15 type money team option attached to it. 1 year, $15M (I think that’s what his 5th year option would have been close too), with a 5 year $100M team option. Don't believe that's possible, though I'm not as familiar with the NFL CBA. Would guess there will be some significant injury protections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 8 hours ago, Klomp said: Don't believe that's possible, though I'm not as familiar with the NFL CBA. Would guess there will be some significant injury protections. What’s not possible about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vike daddy Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 he'd be an undrafted free agent...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitehops Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 This is easy to say in hindsight but given how well teddy's recovery has seemed to go it might've been better to pick up his option. Very tough call to make in advance though, especially if the vikes were planning to re-sign Bradford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitehops Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 1 minute ago, vike daddy said: he'd be an undrafted free agent...? Pretty sure you know what he means...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AP_allday2869 Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 My friend said we should start Sloter over Teddy and Keemun because even if Teddy gets cleared, Teddy was never that good to begin with, and that we might as well start giving Sloter that reps he needs to start for us in the future. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.