packfanfb Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 1 hour ago, Packerraymond said: We're middle of the pack. Problem is that we've been hit the hardest at one of the weakest positions on the team, depending on your point of view. Most people in TC thought our top four WRs would be Adams, MVS, Lazard and EQ. Three of those guys have missed significant parts of the season thus far and it looks the revolving door is still going with Adams' new injury. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 30 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Problem is that we've been hit the hardest at one of the weakest positions on the team, depending on your point of view. Most people in TC thought our top four WRs would be Adams, MVS, Lazard and EQ. Three of those guys have missed significant parts of the season thus far and it looks the revolving door is still going with Adams' new injury. That may be true but those guys being healthy doesn't negate a poor front-7 stemming from the lack of talent along the IDL outside of Kenny Clark playing in an even worse scheme run by someone who should not be the DC... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 34 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Problem is that we've been hit the hardest at one of the weakest positions on the team, depending on your point of view. Most people in TC thought our top four WRs would be Adams, MVS, Lazard and EQ. Three of those guys have missed significant parts of the season thus far and it looks the revolving door is still going with Adams' new injury. If you have to pick the positions you're going to get hit at, RB, WR, and ILB are the spots you would pick. We've missed too many reps at DT, CB, and OT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 3 hours ago, AlexGreen#20 said: If you have to pick the positions you're going to get hit at, RB, WR, and ILB are the spots you would pick. We've missed too many reps at DT, CB, and OT. The problem at DT was that it was Clark lol. I really wouldn't care if any of those other guys missed some reps, in fact, Lowry missing a few weeks with an ankle sprain might help us... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltarich87 Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Last report looking a lot better. Davante is good to go as is both King/Jaire. LaFleur didn't commit to Lazard playing this weekend but if I had to guess, he'll play(likely be on a snap count IMO) Full report Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AustrianPacker Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Davante playing is a big relief Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, AustrianPacker said: Davante playing is a big relief Hes got some pretty heavy spatting on RN. Hopefully it doesnt effect his finessin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 34 minutes ago, deltarich87 said: Last report looking a lot better. Davante is good to go as is both King/Jaire. LaFleur didn't commit to Lazard playing this weekend but if I had to guess, he'll play(likely be on a snap count IMO Not quite sure I'm tracking? Who said Adams is good to go, MLF? Or Silverstein, saying "no designation"? Either I don't get how it works, or else Silverstein maybe just gooded up? Because after he says "WR Davante Adams (ankle) has no designation", then on the IR list right below that it does designate Adams, as limited participation with an ankle... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 18 minutes ago, craig said: Not quite sure I'm tracking? Who said Adams is good to go, MLF? Or Silverstein, saying "no designation"? Either I don't get how it works, or else Silverstein maybe just gooded up? Because after he says "WR Davante Adams (ankle) has no designation", then on the IR list right below that it does designate Adams, as limited participation with an ankle... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 On 11/19/2020 at 4:49 PM, incognito_man said: which feels like great luck compared to past seasons sadly last season was our healthiest season, possibly ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packer_ESP Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 2 hours ago, craig said: then on the IR list right below that it does designate Adams, as limited participation with an ankle... That's Thursday, Friday has no designation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 If we're down Davante and Lazard against this defense.....thats gonna look rugged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted November 21, 2020 Share Posted November 21, 2020 3 hours ago, Leader said: If we're down Davante and Lazard against this defense.....thats gonna look rugged. Adams is ready to go. Didn't expect that, but great news. Lazard is questionable but LaFleur said he's hopeful he'll go. That would be huge. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted November 21, 2020 Share Posted November 21, 2020 Whenever I think about playing the Colts I just picture Nikc Perry destroying Luck on that sack/fumble that resulted in an absolutely horrible roughing the passer call. Still pisses me off. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted November 21, 2020 Share Posted November 21, 2020 On 11/19/2020 at 4:11 PM, ThatJerkDave said: I have long been a proponent of single game PPV. Like, charge me 5-10 dollars, just stream the normal broadcast. I will watch your commercials, and you get additional revenue. I don't see who loses, except directtv. Honestly, with actual movies that are supposed to be in theaters now available on demand, I'm thinking this can't be too far away. I don't even think they'll make it expensive. Maybe like 3.99 or 4.99 a game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.