Scoundrel Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 8 minutes ago, EaglesPeteC said: Adams and Fulgham >>> Nuk and Thomas this is just facts 61-741-9 and 30-443- 4 vs 67-861- 4 and 10- 95- 0 I think it’s clear which duo is better..... You tell em! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted November 19, 2020 Author Share Posted November 19, 2020 Great job by Pete, but NO gets it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rackcs Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Not sure any team in this league doesn't run with at least 3 WRs in their base offense so some advice I would give to Pete is to go with a base nickel. And also have more than three CBs on the game day roster. He has three good safeties so I think some 3 safety looks would be really good too. As for this matchup, I'm not normally a fan of 4 WR base lineups, especially with a subpar starting RB but I'm not sure Portland has the personnel in the secondary to handle it when they adjust to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Portland gives effort, but comes up short. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFLukic Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 12 minutes ago, rackcs said: Not sure any team in this league doesn't run with at least 3 WRs in their base offense so some advice I would give to Pete is to go with a base nickel. And also have more than three CBs on the game day roster. He has three good safeties so I think some 3 safety looks would be really good too. As for this matchup, I'm not normally a fan of 4 WR base lineups, especially with a subpar starting RB but I'm not sure Portland has the personnel in the secondary to handle it when they adjust to it. While I would ordinarily agree with your assessment on the 4WR sets, the Bills do run more 4WR sets than any other team I believe and somethin like 95% in 3 or 4 WR formations. I think Allen's proven that he can do well, if not thrive in such a situation. Moot point I guess once Mixon's back, but still figured I'd mention it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rackcs Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 1 minute ago, WFLukic said: While I would ordinarily agree with your assessment on the 4WR sets, the Bills do run more 4WR sets than any other team I believe and somethin like 95% in 3 or 4 WR formations. I think Allen's proven that he can do well, if not thrive in such a situation. Moot point I guess once Mixon's back, but still figured I'd mention it. I just think it's very easy to adjust to when there are 4 WRs on the field. It's definitely different with Mixon in there but even then I think it's easier to defend when you have four guys out there. I'd be interested in seeing the 4 WR % alone because I feel like a lot of times have a high rate of 3 WR sets these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.