Jump to content

Week 17: Win or Go Home


MKnight82

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, lavar703 said:

I wonder if Al and Chris or Mark Maske who’s basically been having a mental breakdown on twitter over this care at all about what the jaguars just did? They benched their best QB for the last 4 games or whatever to play terrible Mike Glennon. 

Right? I mean of all the QBs to play on that roster, he was the worst and needed the least film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TKellion said:

article says AFC west,I am looking forward to actually going to the Raiders game here in Vegas.Will be my second game all time lol.Always thought the best seat in the house for a football game was on your couch.

Yes, I corrected myself later. It's the AFC West.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, lavar703 said:

I wonder if Al and Chris or Mark Maske who’s basically been having a mental breakdown on twitter over this care at all about what the jaguars just did? They benched their best QB for the last 4 games or whatever to play terrible Mike Glennon. 

Oh, but they're the Jaguars and the play in a division that just needed to answer the question of who gets the title and who gets the wildcard. That doesn't count. Besides, they did tanking right (and got bailed out by the Jets ... that was Adam Gase's "eff you all" on the way out).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Slappy Mc said:

You severely underestimate our ability to lose to mobile QBs.

Especially in crunch time in the 4th quarter. I don’t care what Hurts did in the 3rd quarter. If he’s in there in the 4th he’s bound to do something that we can’t defend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MKnight82 said:

We were winning when he was yanked.

By 3. The first thing Sudfeld did was throw an INT. 

Not saying that Hurts was guaranteed to not throw an INT, but a couple of those sacks wouldn't have happened.

It's pretty simple, anyone who thinks that Sudfeld gave them an equal chance to win is delusional. 

(I acknowledge his terrible numbers, I still stand by my statement.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Woz said:

Yes, but his legs were the one of only two reasons they were in the fight late. The other was that Smith was completely cooked by halftime.

This is the worrisome portion of the game. Two INTs cant happen for a "game manager that doesnt turn the ball over".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Slappy Mc said:

By 3. The first thing Sudfeld did was throw an INT. 

Not saying that Hurts was guaranteed to not throw an INT, but a couple of those sacks wouldn't have happened.

It's pretty simple, anyone who thinks that Sudfeld gave them an equal chance to win is delusional. 

(I acknowledge his terrible numbers, I still stand by my statement.)

bill murray yes GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...