hornbybrown Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 3 hours ago, ChazStandard said: Why all the doom and gloom? Yes, Pats coordinators don't work out well as head coaches, but generally speaking FO personnel do all right. Pioli did some good work in KC, and Dimitroff did OK in Atlanta. I can't think of any others off the top of my head. The Pats have drafted two pro bowl players the last 8 years. They have only been good because of the best coach and QB ever. If they did a half decent job acquiring talent they would of won the super bowl a lot more than they did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadpulse Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Pro Bowlers drafted between 2010 and 2019. Team Picks Pro Bowlers % Team Picks Pro Bowlers % Team Picks Pro Bowlers % KAN 74 15 20.3% CLE 91 9 9.9% HOU 79 6 7.6% DAL 81 13 16.0% LAC 67 8 11.9% DEN 79 6 7.6% BAL 89 12 13.5% ARI 76 8 10.5% PHI 80 6 7.5% MIN 96 12 12.5% SFO 96 8 8.3% CIN 93 6 6.5% SEA 97 12 12.4% CAR 68 7 10.3% NYG 71 5 7.0% MIA 76 10 13.2% TAM 72 7 9.7% BUF 77 5 6.5% PIT 83 10 12.0% TEN 77 7 9.1% IND 80 5 6.3% NOR 61 9 14.8% WAS 88 7 8.0% NWE 87 5 5.7% CHI 63 9 14.3% LAR 90 7 7.8% NYJ 71 4 5.6% ATL 68 9 13.2% JAX 70 6 8.6% OAK 86 4 4.7% GNB 89 9 10.1% DET 77 6 7.8% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Deadpulse said: Pro Bowlers drafted between 2010 and 2019. Team Picks Pro Bowlers % Team Picks Pro Bowlers % Team Picks Pro Bowlers % KAN 74 15 20.3% CLE 91 9 9.9% HOU 79 6 7.6% DAL 81 13 16.0% LAC 67 8 11.9% DEN 79 6 7.6% BAL 89 12 13.5% ARI 76 8 10.5% PHI 80 6 7.5% MIN 96 12 12.5% SFO 96 8 8.3% CIN 93 6 6.5% SEA 97 12 12.4% CAR 68 7 10.3% NYG 71 5 7.0% MIA 76 10 13.2% TAM 72 7 9.7% BUF 77 5 6.5% PIT 83 10 12.0% TEN 77 7 9.1% IND 80 5 6.3% NOR 61 9 14.8% WAS 88 7 8.0% NWE 87 5 5.7% CHI 63 9 14.3% LAR 90 7 7.8% NYJ 71 4 5.6% ATL 68 9 13.2% JAX 70 6 8.6% OAK 86 4 4.7% GNB 89 9 10.1% DET 77 6 7.8% This just makes me more confused about Dallas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jax Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 7 minutes ago, Forge said: This just makes me more confused about Dallas Dallas has had substandard coaching and a lot of individually talented players that haven't meshed well together into cohesive units (especially on defense). This season their injuries played a major factor in their failure of course, same as San Fran. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 33 minutes ago, Deadpulse said: Pro Bowlers drafted between 2010 and 2019. Team Picks Pro Bowlers % Team Picks Pro Bowlers % Team Picks Pro Bowlers % KAN 74 15 20.3% CLE 91 9 9.9% HOU 79 6 7.6% DAL 81 13 16.0% LAC 67 8 11.9% DEN 79 6 7.6% BAL 89 12 13.5% ARI 76 8 10.5% PHI 80 6 7.5% MIN 96 12 12.5% SFO 96 8 8.3% CIN 93 6 6.5% SEA 97 12 12.4% CAR 68 7 10.3% NYG 71 5 7.0% MIA 76 10 13.2% TAM 72 7 9.7% BUF 77 5 6.5% PIT 83 10 12.0% TEN 77 7 9.1% IND 80 5 6.3% NOR 61 9 14.8% WAS 88 7 8.0% NWE 87 5 5.7% CHI 63 9 14.3% LAR 90 7 7.8% NYJ 71 4 5.6% ATL 68 9 13.2% JAX 70 6 8.6% OAK 86 4 4.7% GNB 89 9 10.1% DET 77 6 7.8% 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drd23 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 2 hours ago, KhanYouDigIt said: lmao That's probably social justice/Jacob Blake related, but even if it is the timing is not great 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakuvious Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 hour ago, Forge said: This just makes me more confused about Dallas They've gotten spectacularly little long term production out of the talent they've acquired, for a myriad of reasons. Whether it's guys who weren't that good in the first place, coaching failures, or front office failures, that list of 13 pro bowlers is loaded with guys who looked really good and then had an early exit or decline. Injuries for Bryant, Lee, Prescott, and LVE. Early retirement from Frederick. Lawrence got paid and quit. Jones and Harris left in FA (Harris being a return man inflates the number, kind of.) Murray and Zeke were RBs. Jaylon Smith might have been a fan vote. I don't feel like he was that good, but I'd be lying if I said I paid that much attention. Tyron Smith and Zach Martin are really the only guys they've gotten conventional pro-bowl careers out of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 29 minutes ago, Jakuvious said: They've gotten spectacularly little long term production out of the talent they've acquired, for a myriad of reasons. Whether it's guys who weren't that good in the first place, coaching failures, or front office failures, that list of 13 pro bowlers is loaded with guys who looked really good and then had an early exit or decline. Injuries for Bryant, Lee, Prescott, and LVE. Early retirement from Frederick. Lawrence got paid and quit. Jones and Harris left in FA (Harris being a return man inflates the number, kind of.) Murray and Zeke were RBs. Jaylon Smith might have been a fan vote. I don't feel like he was that good, but I'd be lying if I said I paid that much attention. Tyron Smith and Zach Martin are really the only guys they've gotten conventional pro-bowl careers out of. This has a lot to do with it. America’s team after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 3 hours ago, hornbybrown said: The Pats have drafted two pro bowl players the last 8 years. They have only been good because of the best coach and QB ever. If they did a half decent job acquiring talent they would of won the super bowl a lot more than they did. Catch 22 though isn't it. Always picking late 20s, 30s or not at all in the first round. It's not an excuse for poor drafting (Harry for example), but it is a fair point, in my opinion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 2 minutes ago, Hunter2_1 said: Catch 22 though isn't it. Always picking late 20s, 30s or not at all in the first round. But it's not like Pro Bowlers are found in the first - in your example, Harry went ahead of three Pro Bowl WRs. Sony Michel was taken ahead of Nick Chubb and Ronald Jones II. It's a clear and present misunderstanding by the Patriots on who is going to develop into a good player and who isn't. Quick exercise here - who is the last good player drafted by the Pats with their first pick? Not even a Pro Bowler, but a guy who hasn't been a complete disaster? Not Harry, not Michel... Derek Rivers? Malcolm Brown? Dominic Easley? That's a flat out disaster. And it's my disaster now. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 minute ago, ET80 said: But it's not like Pro Bowlers are found in the first - in your example, Harry went ahead of three Pro Bowl WRs. Sony Michel was taken ahead of Nick Chubb and Ronald Jones II. It's a clear and present misunderstanding by the Patriots on who is going to develop into a good player and who isn't. Quick exercise here - who is the last good player drafted by the Pats with their first pick? Not even a Pro Bowler, but a guy who hasn't been a complete disaster? Not Harry, not Michel... Derek Rivers? Malcolm Brown? Dominic Easley? That's a flat out disaster. And it's my disaster now. I think it's Dugger, but if you discount this season... I'm tempted to say Michel because he did run us to a SB but since he's been bad. I'll say Wynn. Franchise LT probably. But your point about pro bowlers in first round is correct. I don't know who is actually picking then? Who has final refusal? We always blame BB, but is it Caseiro? One good thing, you can't deny our ability to find gems at OL. Always picking gems at OL that people don't expect. Thuney, Andrews and Onwenu of recent drafts spring to mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drd23 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 hour ago, Hunter2_1 said: Catch 22 though isn't it. Always picking late 20s, 30s or not at all in the first round. It's not an excuse for poor drafting (Harry for example), but it is a fair point, in my opinion Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Green Bay etc haven't been picking much earlier (if at all) in the same time period compared to the Pats and yet have been more successful at drafting eventual Pro Bowlers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilenFroggen Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Read someone referring to Easterby as Cal McNair’s Rasputin. Seems apt. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 2 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said: But your point about pro bowlers in first round is correct. I don't know who is actually picking then? Who has final refusal? We always blame BB, but is it Caseiro? This is a lose/lose scenario: - If it's Caserio, then it's evidence he doesn't know what he's doing. - If it's Belicheck, then Caserio doesn't have enough experience or pull to effectively do the job he just signed up for. 2 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said: One good thing, you can't deny our ability to find gems at OL. Always picking gems at OL that people don't expect. Thuney, Andrews and Onwenu of recent drafts spring to mind. How much of this is Dante Scarneccia? I'd argue that - specific to OL - coaching up technique and scheme is more than identifying talent. We've seen the OL guys leave New England and not live up to expectations (Trent Brown is good, but that's about it). 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.