DontTazeMeBro Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 I really want to know wtf Sorensen is supposed to do other than surrender the TD. Explain to me how he is supposed to contort his body in a way that his helmet doesn’t make contact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTrav Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 I feel like we are scoring slowly, but making these drives count. Holding Cleveland to 3 in a half too, not many saw that coming. This is great from Reid, spags and co. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefer Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 minute ago, seminoles1 said: What? He fumbled at the 1. Why can't it be put back at the 1? Because it went OOB in the end zone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkippyX Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 2 minutes ago, kingseanjohn said: Next year is going to be rough for us with the cap likely going down. But in 2022 we have like 60+mil available iirc. Act like the Saints and just mortgage the future by restructuring forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mse326 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 I'm still not sure that helmet to helmet was a foul. I looks like the initial contact may have been with the side of the helmet. It needs to be the crown for a penalty. Maybe there is another view that makes it more clear, it was close at the least, but I can certainly see why it wasn't called in real time 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 4 minutes ago, bigbadbuff said: If kicking rules should be applied then why not kickoff and get the ball out at the 10 yard line for example and maintain possession? Why does one kicking rule translate and not the other? Because kickoffs have specific rules associated with them. Most notably, if you don't kick at least 10 yards forward, it's a penalty and change of possession. The definition of touchback is simple and static. If a ball goes out of bounds in an endzone of the team that didn't have possession at the start of the play, it's a touchback. I personally prefer keeping rules and definitions simple. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdrawkcab321 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 I really think this would be a tie game if it wasn’t for Higgins fumble and tellers holding call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJaxxenGuy Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 That no call really wasn’t that bad. I see that hit twice a game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefer Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Just now, BigTrav said: I feel like we are scoring slowly, but making these drives count. Holding Cleveland to 3 in a half too, not many saw that coming. This is great from Reid, spags and co. DVOA stated the Run Defense was the worst, so by the numbers it’s quite shocking the low totals were holding the Browns offense . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 3 minutes ago, Forge said: Rest of the NFL just really hoping the salary cap catches up to the chiefs once we are officially past the mahomes rookie deal I personally don't mind seeing them becoming the next dynasty. At least it's not the Patriots anymore. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 minute ago, TheKillerNacho said: just pointing out that what you actually mean is you want some sort of conditional rule added to change the definition of touchback in certain situations No I 100% support the rule that the ball being downed or going out of bounds on a change of possession results in a touchback I reject the concept that fumbling oob in the ez should be a change of possession Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seminoles1 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 Just now, Chiefer said: Because it went OOB in the end zone So? Again, anywhere else on the field the ball is brought back to the spot of the fumble if the ball goes forward and out of bounds. Just because it's the end zone doesn't mean the ball can't be brought back to the 1 yard line, the spot of the fumble in this situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 minute ago, seminoles1 said: This is a situational rule completely separate from the entire rest of the field when it comes to fumbles. Not really. It's handled by the over-arching safety/touchback rule... Ball goes out of bounds in an endzone... Was it the endzone of the team with possession at play start? Safety. Is it the endzone of the team without? Touchback. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTrav Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 minute ago, sdrawkcab321 said: I really think this would be a tie game if it wasn’t for Higgins fumble and tellers holding call I really think if my grandmother had wheels she'd be a bike 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTrav Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 minute ago, Chiefer said: DVOA stated the Run Defense was the worst, so by the numbers it’s quite shocking the low totals were holding the Browns offense . You saying DVOA isn't gospel?! Oh dear. Not what I heard earlier in this thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts