squire12 Posted February 13, 2021 Author Share Posted February 13, 2021 Green Bay Packers announce the contract restructure for Billy Turner 0226 - Billy Turner - RT 2021 cap savings = $1.722M 2022 cap increase = $1.722M 0226 - Billy Turner - RT Enter "New" 2021 Base Salary Amount $1,080,000 Base salary amount must be between vet min and current base salary amount. Restructure Data Fixed Contract Length 2 Base Salary Converted to Bonus $3,445,000 Proration of Converted Base Salary $1,722,500 2021 Base Gtd Converted to Proration Total amount converted to proration $1,722,500 Contract Structured Criteria Player Name Validation Pass Restructure Allotment Pass Vet. Min Ruling Pass Valid Restructured Contract 2021 Savings: $1,722,500 2022 Savings: -$1,722,500 Restructure Allotment $2,506,500 2021 Salary Cap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted February 13, 2021 Author Share Posted February 13, 2021 Josh Jackson + ??? pick for Michael Gallup GO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted February 13, 2021 Share Posted February 13, 2021 2 minutes ago, squire12 said: Josh Jackson + ??? pick for Michael Gallup GO eh... I dunno. Josh Jackson is not worth much, but I wouldn't give up more than a 3rd for Gallup for a 1 year rental, and not in love with his game in this offense to pay him market value after a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted February 13, 2021 Author Share Posted February 13, 2021 6 minutes ago, JBURGE said: eh... I dunno. Josh Jackson is not worth much, but I wouldn't give up more than a 3rd for Gallup for a 1 year rental, and not in love with his game in this offense to pay him market value after a year. understood. it is a 1 year mock, so the future is less involved. I do still try to do this with a long term view in mind. I think he is a piece that would work really well opposite Adams and be a better long term signing than MVS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted February 13, 2021 Share Posted February 13, 2021 (edited) 2 minutes ago, squire12 said: understood. it is a 1 year mock, so the future is less involved. I do still try to do this with a long term view in mind. I think he is a piece that would work really well opposite Adams and be a better long term signing than MVS I don't disagree, he is a better player than MVS. I have no idea if Gallup can or has been asked to block, but you know he will be in this offense. He will probably cost $12-$15MM, which is fine if we get a comp pick back. I guess I would trade Jackson and a 4? Would be hard for me to bump that to a 3 but I probably would if needed. Above that is a hard no. Would rather just trade Love and use one of the 2nds to draft a WR with cheap control for 4 years. The recent hit rate on 2nd round WRs is so good it lowers my interest in using a high pick to trade for one. Edited February 13, 2021 by JBURGE 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted February 13, 2021 Author Share Posted February 13, 2021 8 minutes ago, JBURGE said: I don't disagree, he is a better player than MVS. I have no idea if Gallup can or has been asked to block, but you know he will be in this offense. He will probably cost $12-$15MM, which is fine if we get a comp pick back. I guess I would trade Jackson and a 4? Would be hard for me to bump that to a 3 but I probably would if needed. Above that is a hard no. Would rather just trade Love and use one of the 2nds to draft a WR with cheap control for 4 years. The recent hit rate on 2nd round WRs is so good it lowers my interest in using a high pick to trade for one. I have no idea on the blocking exploits of Gallup. I hope the GB staff is not going to pigeon hole themselves too much into having that be a huge requirement for a WR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted February 13, 2021 Share Posted February 13, 2021 1 hour ago, squire12 said: I have no idea on the blocking exploits of Gallup. I hope the GB staff is not going to pigeon hole themselves too much into having that be a huge requirement for a WR I don't either, but imo our interest in Will Fuller should give you a good idea of how much we value it. If we weren't budging for more than a 4th, not sure we would go any higher for Gallup. However you do you baby, I would like us to be more aggressive and I think Gallup helps us more this coming year than a 3rd round pick does. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 7 hours ago, squire12 said: Josh Jackson + ??? pick for Michael Gallup GO 3rd is the highest I'd go. Defense is more my focus in the off-season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemike778 Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 On 1/26/2021 at 3:51 AM, squire12 said: Transactions Za'Darius Smith Contract extension (link to the post in thread) ERFA Contract offers (link to the post in thread) Aaron Rodgers contract restructure (link to the post in thread) Davante Adams contract extension (link to the post in thread) Adrian Amos contract restructure (link to the post in thread) Billy Turner contract restructure (link to the post in thread) Good grief that's a lot of kicking the cap down the road. And that's with a flat cap - what would you be doing if the salary cap was down to 180m ? We'd be restructuring the locker room - selling it off to buy pack in 2023. Guess a mock would be boring if it had to have some sense of connection to the real world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted February 14, 2021 Author Share Posted February 14, 2021 13 minutes ago, mikemike778 said: Good grief that's a lot of kicking the cap down the road. And that's with a flat cap - what would you be doing if the salary cap was down to 180m ? We'd be restructuring the locker room - selling it off to buy pack in 2023. Guess a mock would be boring if it had to have some sense of connection to the real world. Based on how the restructures and extensions are set up, Bahktiari wouldn't have saved as much in this TCMD mock as he did in real life. Adams extension is I think 80% likely to happen Z Smith probably 50% likely to happen The Amos and Turner restructure are pretty small in the grand schof cap space considerations. Rodgers is the interesting one as it makes Love hard to capitalize during the rookie contract. You are right in that it would be no fun for 1/3 of the teams to be just cutting players to get under the cap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemike778 Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 6 hours ago, squire12 said: Based on how the restructures and extensions are set up, Bahktiari wouldn't have saved as much in this TCMD mock as he did in real life. Adams extension is I think 80% likely to happen Z Smith probably 50% likely to happen The Amos and Turner restructure are pretty small in the grand schof cap space considerations. Rodgers is the interesting one as it makes Love hard to capitalize during the rookie contract. You are right in that it would be no fun for 1/3 of the teams to be just cutting players to get under the cap. Yes but that's with a flat cap of about 200m If you are doing that much restructuring and extending with 200m, what would you do if its down to 180m ? I get it, its a mock and you have to have fun with it but I think a lot of fans seem to think these restructures/extensions are free money. In reality they probably make you less competitive in future seasons. Not sure what I think about the extensions if they happen. Generally I dislike having too many big 3rd contracts, it leaves you with players on the decline, more prone to injury on big contracts that quickly look horrible contracts, more so if you have pushed cap hits back into them like what is going on here. I do want a competitive team next season though. I didn't like the Love pick but at this point, they probably want that 2022 option. What they do with Rodgers contract will be very telling. If they are planning to with Love they probably aren't going to put him in a position where they can't give him much help as they fighting against the cap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted February 14, 2021 Author Share Posted February 14, 2021 19 minutes ago, mikemike778 said: Yes but that's with a flat cap of about 200m If you are doing that much restructuring and extending with 200m, what would you do if its down to 180m ? It all intertwines. Bigger cap means contracts are bigger. Smaller cap means UFA might be / should be signed for cheaper. 19 minutes ago, mikemike778 said: I get it, its a mock and you have to have fun with it but I think a lot of fans seem to think these restructures/extensions are free money. In reality they probably make you less competitive in future seasons. Not sure what I think about the extensions if they happen. Generally I dislike having too many big 3rd contracts, it leaves you with players on the decline, more prone to injury on big contracts that quickly look horrible contracts, more so if you have pushed cap hits back into them like what is going on here. I do want a competitive team next season though. At some point, taking that risk might be needed. 19 minutes ago, mikemike778 said: I didn't like the Love pick but at this point, they probably want that 2022 option. What they do with Rodgers contract will be very telling. If they are planning to with Love they probably aren't going to put him in a position where they can't give him much help as they fighting against the cap. Possible for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 (edited) Fans making way too much out of the Love situation. Raw out of college. No training camp last year and possibly no training camp this year. Took 3rd string reps in practice (near zero) and is under contract until 2024. Rodgers got a new contract and started in his fourth year. Unless you have weirdness (Favre situation) these things always work themselves out. Why all the panic about making a declaration or a time line ?? Edited February 15, 2021 by cannondale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted February 16, 2021 Author Share Posted February 16, 2021 (edited) ***ROUND TWO - FREE AGENCY BIDDING RESULTS*** GB targeted Sheldon Rankins, Angelo Blackson, Darqueze Dennard. GB was awarded all 3 of them Rankins and Blackson will add to the DL and solidify the depth and increase the quality along the DL and give help to Kenny Clark Dennard will compete with Kevin Johnson and Chandon Sullivan for starting CB spots opposite Jaire Alexander Contract details below Angelo Blackson Base Salary Base Guar. Prorated $990,000 $2,000,000 $2,186,000 $2,000,000 $3,441,800 $2,000,000 $5,074,340 $2,000,000 $11,692,140 $8,000,000 Sheldon Rankins Base Salary Base Guar. Prorated $990,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $500,000 $2,100,000 $500,000 $2,700,000 $500,000 $7,290,000 $2,000,000 Darquez Dennard Base Salary Base Guar. Prorated $990,000 $1,100,000 $1,800,000 $1,100,000 $2,600,000 $1,100,000 $3,700,000 $1,100,000 $9,090,000 $4,400,000 Edited February 16, 2021 by squire12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted February 16, 2021 Author Share Posted February 16, 2021 Updated Depth Chart Several holes to fill in the starting units. RB: AJ Dillon likely ascends to RB1, but there is not anything on the roster behind him with much NFL game experience C : Jenkins can slide into that slot, but then an opening at LG emerges. CB: Johnson slotted in as starter. Chandon Sullivan back in the slot. (adding Dennard along with Kevin Johnson + returning of Sullivan means those 3 can battle for the spots opposite Jaire and the slot CB. Allows options for draft to be BPA) DL: Hole to fill, Keke has a shot to do so, but then the depth is non-existent. (adding Rankins and Blackson adds depth and more flexibility for the draft. Still probably need a 2nd run plugger for back up to Clark) Thoughts??? STARTER ERFA RFA UFA QB Aaron Rodgers Jordan Love Randy Ramsey Chandon Sullivan Kevin King RB AJ Dillon Patrick Taylor Kabion Ento Will Redmond Aaron Jones FB John Lovett Yosh Nijman Raven Greene Corey Linsley WR Davante Adams Devin Funchess Chris Blair Allan Lazard Tyler Lancaster Jamaal Williams WR MVS EQ Malik Taylor Tim Boyle Lane Taylor WR Allan Lazard Malik Taylor Robert Tonyan Tyler Ervin TE Robert Tonyan Josiah Deguara Jace Sternberger Dominique Dafney Parry Nickerson Montravius Adams LT David Bahktiari Yosh Nijman Ray Wilbom Marcedes Lewis LG Elgton Jenkins Simon Stepaniak Ben Braden UFA James Burgess C Chad Hanson Austin Reiter Extension Tavon Austin RG Lucas Patrick John Runyan Kevin Johnson Z Smith Damon Harrison RT Billy Turner Rick Wagner Roy Robertson Harris Adams Billy Winn Chad Hanson STARTER Sheldon Rankins LDE Dean Lowry Angelo Blackson Bronson Kaufusi Angelo Blackson Restructures NT Kenny Clark Darqueze Dennard Rodgers RDE Sheldon Rankins Kingsley Keke Amos WLB Preston Smith Rashan Gary Randy Ramsey Turner LILB Krys Barnes Oren Burks RILB Christian Kirksey Kamal Martin Ty Summers SLB Za'Darius Smith Jonathan Garvin LCB Jaire Alexander Josh Jackson SS Adrian Amos Innis Gaines FS Darnell Savage Vernon Scott Henry Black RCB Kevin Johnson Ka'dar Hollman Kabion Ento Slot CB Darqueze Dennard Chandon Sullivan STARTER PK Mason Crosby P JK Scott H JK Scott PR KR LS Hunter Bradley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.