Jump to content

Future QB Discussion


G08

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Sugashane said:

Agree on all points.

For me the big issue is Nagy. He can't run an offense, he thinks he is far more intelligent than he really is. So why should we put a major financial investment in a guy when we don;t have a coach that will fit the offense to him AND we lack the capital to put talent around him.

Wentz is talented, he was behind a crap OL and no one played that well around him. The three prior years weren't a fluke. But add in the issues above with the injury history and it is a gamble I don't care to make.

He's fragile it seems, we have a mediocre OL and crap OTs, we would lose ARob so talent around him is down, and he's potentially mentally weak with a HC is borderline incompetent. It's just a bad mix even if he has solid potential and is absolutely talented.

I tend to agree with this thinking but the argument that has been made in defense of Nagy these past 3 years is that he didn't have a good enough QB to make his offense work.

Part of me wants the team to trade for Wentz who as I said before would be far and away the best  QB talent that Nagy ever had as coach of the Bears..just so we can finally put all the talk of Nagy being some offensive guru to rest..as some still believe he is..which I guess has a slight chance of still being true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, topwop1 said:

I tend to agree with this thinking but the argument that has been made in defense of Nagy these past 3 years is that he didn't have a good enough QB to make his offense work.

Part of me wants the team to trade for Wentz who as I said before would be far and away the best  QB talent that Nagy ever had as coach of the Bears..just so we can finally put all the talk of Nagy being some offensive guru to rest..as some still believe he is..which I guess has a slight chance of still being true

I don’t want to spend too much to know what I already know. Nagy sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, topwop1 said:

Agreed. You don't trade anything  for a backup player you could have signed easily as a FA just last year

I don't hate Mariota but he's more or less another Mitch Trubisky 

Give me Minshew instead 

Minshew would be a good option as well. I think he would cost more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carson Wentz, Eagles

I’ve gone over Wentz multiple times before so I won’t spend a lot of time on it. Wentz costs the Eagles $34.67 million on the cap in 2021 and $33.8 million if traded before the 3rd day of the league year and $43.8 million if traded after that date. The cost to cut Wentz is $59.22 million prior to June 1 and $34.67 million if designated a June 1 cut. Wentz earns a $15 million guarantee for 2022 if he is on the roster on the 3rd day of the league year as well.  A team acquiring Wentz would carry cap hits of $25.4 million, $22 million, $25 million, and $26 million so four years for and average of $24.6 million a year with $47.4 million guaranteed (Yes its less if the Eagles pay that $10 million but that would not makes sense for them from a cap standpoint). So this is a better contract to take on than the Goff contract but there are probably more questions with Wentz than Goff. Goff you know is serviceable. The Wentz we saw last year was not. A trade makes some sense for Philadelphia but they would be best off restructuring the deal for cap relief and seeing if he can be traded the following season or coached back to a higher level of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, JAF-N72EX said:

Carson Wentz, Eagles

I’ve gone over Wentz multiple times before so I won’t spend a lot of time on it. Wentz costs the Eagles $34.67 million on the cap in 2021 and $33.8 million if traded before the 3rd day of the league year and $43.8 million if traded after that date. The cost to cut Wentz is $59.22 million prior to June 1 and $34.67 million if designated a June 1 cut. Wentz earns a $15 million guarantee for 2022 if he is on the roster on the 3rd day of the league year as well.  A team acquiring Wentz would carry cap hits of $25.4 million, $22 million, $25 million, and $26 million so four years for and average of $24.6 million a year with $47.4 million guaranteed (Yes its less if the Eagles pay that $10 million but that would not makes sense for them from a cap standpoint). So this is a better contract to take on than the Goff contract but there are probably more questions with Wentz than Goff. Goff you know is serviceable. The Wentz we saw last year was not. A trade makes some sense for Philadelphia but they would be best off restructuring the deal for cap relief and seeing if he can be traded the following season or coached back to a higher level of play.

That they’re openly looking to trade him to the highest bidder suggests that they’ve already made the decision that they’re going to spend their developmental resources on Hurts or someone they draft at #6, so the restructure for relief angle doesn’t make a lot of sense. Also, what would be the incentive for Wentz to agree to restructure his deal without some kind of assurance that he’s going to be their starter (which he almost certainly wouldn’t get)? Do a favor for the team that’s telling you they’ve decided they don’t want you on the squad anymore? Outside of a retiring player like Brees nobody’s doing that.

The reason PHI would potentially agree to pay the $10M bonus to facilitate a trade of Wentz despite it being less favorable for their cap is simple - to procure higher draft capital from a team (like ours) who also have cap problems. They’d have that leverage against us if it comes down to us and IND having comparable offers. Them giving us Wentz AND $10M in extra cap space is worth significantly more than them giving IND Wentz without it. $10M in cap space means one or two less players we’d need to clear to absorb Wentz and keep ARob. If the deals available were Wentz at $25M in 2021 for a 2 or Wentz at $15M in 2021 for a 2 and another pick or a player or something like that then there’s a really good argument that the latter is a better move for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, topwop1 said:

I tend to agree with this thinking but the argument that has been made in defense of Nagy these past 3 years is that he didn't have a good enough QB to make his offense work.

Part of me wants the team to trade for Wentz who as I said before would be far and away the best  QB talent that Nagy ever had as coach of the Bears..just so we can finally put all the talk of Nagy being some offensive guru to rest..as some still believe he is..which I guess has a slight chance of still being true

I get the argument completely but when I-formation or 22 personnel or whatever works barely gets used? Then the playcaller is a moron. Plus while Tru isnt a good QB he regressed 2 straight years under Nagy, most of the offense did. I firmly believe Nagy is one of the biggest limiting factors to this team. 

People can believe Nagy is good, being wrong is fine if you're not being paid to be right. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JAF-N72EX said:

While this is true, the video does confirm that Wentz wasn't just terrible because of a bad supporting cast.  

You can pick out 15 plays from any player and make him look however you want in a 3 minute video. Clips like that only show you what the person making the video wants to show you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My #1 goal is to head into the draft so desperate that we see one of the craziest draft day trades ever.

Pick 2 or 3 on the clock and the Bears logo appears. That would be exciting. Then finding out Pace trades everything we will ever have. That will be so much more fun than talking ourselves into Wentz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, WindyCity said:

My #1 goal is to head into the draft so desperate that we see one of the craziest draft day trades ever.

Pick 2 or 3 on the clock and the Bears logo appears. That would be exciting. Then finding out Pace trades everything we will ever have. That will be so much more fun than talking ourselves into Wentz.

Fans have seemingly already decided that Wentz couldn’t possibly work out here if we make the move. Rational thought or optimism, even extremely guarded optimism, is already being dismissed as homerism and “Bear goggles.”

Not that any player could ever live up to Bears fans’ expectations for perfection at the position... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...