Mazrimiv 988 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 2 hours ago, Sasquatch said: Goff was way too efficient tonight for my liking, especially considering he didn’t have Kupp in the lineup. In the end it doesn’t matter, but I was expecting a lesser passing performance from Goff to be honest. Are we talking about the same Goff who threw for 174 yards and was sacked 4 times? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sasquatch 1,153 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Just now, Mazrimiv said: Are we talking about the same Goff who threw for 174 yards and was sacked 4 times? I was expecting Goff to throw for less than 10 receptions, less than 100 yards total - especially with Kupp out. So yeah, he outperformed my expectations. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mazrimiv 988 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Just now, Sasquatch said: I was expecting Goff to throw for less than 10 receptions, less than 100 yards total - especially with Kupp out. So yeah, he outperformed my expectations. Those are dumb expectations Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sasquatch 1,153 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 2 minutes ago, Mazrimiv said: Those are dumb expectations And you’re easy to **** with! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gopackgo972 278 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Where is @CWood21 to fluff this up 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
deltarich87 1,897 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Todd Gurley shut up 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
deltarich87 1,897 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 41 minutes ago, packfanfb said: A good description here: Lol sums it up. I think it's also PTSD from watching all those prior Packers defenses over the past decade. Even this stat surprised me Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rodjahs12 524 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Goff was better than I expected he’d be but ultimately 174 yards passing isn’t going to beat this offense unless it’s accompanied by another 150+ rushing to kill the clock. I think Pettine knows that, and it’s part of the reason why he’s so comfortable playing soft. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Leader 2,842 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Zach Kruse - Just want to give a shoutout to maybe the most under-appreciated player on this Packers roster in 2020. Rick Wagner. Played over 600 snaps in the regular season and allowed 1 sack (while playing LT in TB). Leonard Floyd had zero QB hits and zero sacks today. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HighCalebR 1,340 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 1 minute ago, Leader said: Zach Kruse - Just want to give a shoutout to maybe the most under-appreciated player on this Packers roster in 2020. Rick Wagner. Played over 600 snaps in the regular season and allowed 1 sack (while playing LT in TB). Leonard Floyd had zero QB hits and zero sacks today. I know you're not saying it, but Floyd is a perfect example of a C player getting boosted from an A player. Floyd is fast, and gets Donalds scraps. Donald is negligible, Floyd is invisible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
deltarich87 1,897 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 3 minutes ago, Rodjahs12 said: Goff was better than I expected he’d be but ultimately 174 yards passing isn’t going to beat this offense unless it’s accompanied by another 150+ rushing to kill the clock. I think Pettine knows that, and it’s part of the reason why he’s so comfortable playing soft. I think the Packers defense has only allowed a 300 yard passer ONCE all season too(Deshaun Watson, who barely finished over 300) 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Leader 2,842 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Just now, HighCalebR said: I know you're not saying it, but Floyd is a perfect example of a C player getting boosted from an A player. Floyd is fast, and gets Donalds scraps. Donald is negligible, Floyd is invisible. He makes some plays for them. He's not a stud....but he makes some plays. He didnt do squat today.....that I can recall at least. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pgwingman 65 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 56 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Hi guys Didn't you go to the game? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HighCalebR 1,340 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 6 minutes ago, Rodjahs12 said: Goff was better than I expected he’d be but ultimately 174 yards passing isn’t going to beat this offense unless it’s accompanied by another 150+ rushing to kill the clock. I think Pettine knows that, and it’s part of the reason why he’s so comfortable playing soft. If vegas puts an over line at 175 for a QB you should smash the over out of respect for the league. the fact he didnt get it means we did very well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sasquatch 1,153 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Rodjahs12 said: Goff was better than I expected he’d be but ultimately 174 yards passing isn’t going to beat this offense unless it’s accompanied by another 150+ rushing to kill the clock. I think Pettine knows that, and it’s part of the reason why he’s so comfortable playing soft. Coming into today’s game, Goff has been terrible. Just look at his previous 4 games: QBR - 49, 51, 20, 47. Today he had a 84 QBR with a 77% completion percentage. He exceeded my expectations today when considering his lack of cold weather experience, bad thumb, terrible past four games, and no Kupp. He clearly needed more help from his running game and his o-line (pressures and sacks), but props to GB’s defense all the way around for a dominant performance. Edited January 17 by Sasquatch Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.