packfanfb Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 11 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: It's a change to the terms of the contract, player has to sign off on void years. The restructures have language built in that allows teams to do it at their leisure, the void years are different and need sign off. Makes sense. I guess stated another way, why would a player ever object to adding void years to his contract for money he's already been paid? I can't think of one. In that sense, I'd look at approval more as a formality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 23 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: How do you know what Rodgers cap hit is in years that we don't have a cap yet?? NFL just signed a 10 billion dollar annual TV deal, players are guaranteed 48% of that. The cap is going to explode here soon. Lol. It’s not going to explode to get a cap hit of 19.6 down under 12%. That last year yeah it’ll go below 12%, you’re right. So if we keep everything as is we’ll have Rodgers three years older plus Amos and Z at an age where they’re either somewhere else or not what they are. This past year was the shot. We missed it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 (edited) All of this conjecture assumes Love is on an upward trajectory. The reality is that there is just as good a chance Love is Brett Hundley. As a Packer fan it's easy to assume Love is just another quality QB waiting his turn. The bust rate is high. I don't think there is a time line. I don't think the Packers operate under any assumptions. Edited March 23, 2021 by cannondale 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 For the reasons @Outpost31 mentioned (among others) I'm pretty pessimistic about us even advancing to a NFCCG the rest of Rodgers' career in GB at this point. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenrik Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 17 minutes ago, cannondale said: All of this conjecture assumes Love is on an upward trajectory. The reality is that there is just as good a chance Love is Brett Hundley. As a Packer fan it's easy to assume Love is just another quality QB waiting his turn. The bust rate is high. I don't think there is a time line. I don't think the Packers operate under any assumptions. I think he's going to be a hit in large part to the offensive scheme and his strong athletic skill, but it's far from a given. He could wind up as DeShone Kizer part 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 (edited) 1 minute ago, Kenrik said: 6 million! Overpay. At least they have someone in place. Now draft two corners and let them fight for jobs. Edited March 23, 2021 by {Family Ghost} Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoremore Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 1 minute ago, Kenrik said: Thought this was a possiblity. Soft market for King. Not bad for either side just about right. Would have rather coughed up an extra 3 mil for Fuller but hey money is tight. Hopefully King will play better next year and stay healthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 Love that!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fussnputz Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 2 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said: 6 million! Overpay Gaaa. They should still sign Malcolm Butler. King's injury history requires that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinneasGage Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 **** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 1 minute ago, Scoremore said: Thought this was a possiblity. Soft market for King. Not bad for either side just about right. Would have rather coughed up an extra 3 mil for Fuller but hey money is tight. Hopefully King will play better next year and stay healthy. He's at least got some incentive to bring his A game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 1 minute ago, Mr. Fussnputz said: Gaaa. They should still sign Malcolm Butler. King's injury history requires that. I would have signed Butler and told King to take a hike. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoremore Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 1 minute ago, {Family Ghost} said: I would have signed Butler and told King to take a hike. Think King is the better CB. When healthy. Had to throw that in there. Nice to have him back but we'll still need to draft another CB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 Thought he could have been had cheaper, but I still believe there is upside there. Have to folllow it up with a legit draft choice 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.