Tetsujin Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 Kyle Pitts, and will be moved to WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinSting Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 That's a bold guess! Pitts is being called a generational talent by some though, massive dude. And though a TE, he already spent a lil' bit of time at WR when he was a freshman at Florida... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phinsesq Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 1 hour ago, Tetsujin said: Kyle Pitts, and will be moved to WR. Bold, prediction I am going with Smith (if he is there) or Chase (if Smith is gone). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetsujin Posted February 5, 2021 Author Share Posted February 5, 2021 Pitts is way too much of a missmatch nightmare with his speed size and agility. Nice hands and route running too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadeye Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 6 hours ago, Tetsujin said: Kyle Pitts, and will be moved to WR. I prefer a trade down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetsujin Posted February 5, 2021 Author Share Posted February 5, 2021 9 minutes ago, Deadeye said: I prefer a trade down. Me too I’m just stating what I think will happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinSting Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 1 hour ago, Tetsujin said: Me too I’m just stating what I think will happen. A 6'6" TE veteran paired with a 6'6" TE-turned-WR slot rook would be wild. Hey Tua just throw it up there. One of us will go get it. Extremely tall receivers always make think of Megatron, and how he was the overused word 'unstoppable' except for him it was actually true. A muscular 6'5" receiver running a 4.3. There's no defense for that. Just know he'll get 100 yds+ on the day and you'll have to find some other way to beat the Lions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jdolphins18 Posted February 6, 2021 Share Posted February 6, 2021 (edited) Is there a chance that Pitts lasts till 18? If so would the paring of Pitts at 18 and Devonta Smith at 3 make people mad or happy? Personally I’m a Smith at 3 guy whether Chase and/or Sewell is there. At 18 I really like Najee Harris but Jevonta Williams is a guy I really like two and wouldn’t mind getting a Tackle or Parsons if he’s there at 18 and taking Williams at 36. I really wouldn’t mind Pitts at 3 but I live Preston Williams, I guess Preston and Pitts could be boundary guys with Parker in the slot? We would have a huge receiving core with Pitts, Williams, Parker and Gesicki Edited February 6, 2021 by Jdolphins18 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetsujin Posted February 6, 2021 Author Share Posted February 6, 2021 3 hours ago, Jdolphins18 said: I really wouldn’t mind Pitts at 3 but I live Preston Williams, I guess Preston and Pitts could be boundary guys with Parker in the slot? We would have a huge receiving core with Pitts, Williams, Parker and Gesicki I’m not high on Preston Williams. If I’m Flo/Grier, I keep only Parker, Bowden, and Perry going forward. Sign a good FA then draft 2 before the end on Day 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phinsesq Posted February 6, 2021 Share Posted February 6, 2021 6 hours ago, Jdolphins18 said: Is there a chance that Pitts lasts till 18? If so would the paring of Pitts at 18 and Devonta Smith at 3 make people mad or happy? Personally I’m a Smith at 3 guy whether Chase and/or Sewell is there. At 18 I really like Najee Harris but Jevonta Williams is a guy I really like two and wouldn’t mind getting a Tackle or Parsons if he’s there at 18 and taking Williams at 36. I really wouldn’t mind Pitts at 3 but I live Preston Williams, I guess Preston and Pitts could be boundary guys with Parker in the slot? We would have a huge receiving core with Pitts, Williams, Parker and Gesicki Pitts could drop. I like Williams. but the problem I have with Parker, Williams and Gisecki is that all of them seem injury prone. I want a WR at 3. I wouldn't mind a Harris or Etienne at 18 either or Waddle if he somehow magically drops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetsujin Posted February 6, 2021 Author Share Posted February 6, 2021 Does anyone do the PFN Mock Draft Simulator? It’s addicting. Using a 2nd rounder for trade bait, I get Waddle, Pitts, and Humphrey in the first 2 rounds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mountainpd Posted February 6, 2021 Share Posted February 6, 2021 I would love Pitt’s with one of Waddle, Smith and Chase. One trade down from 3 and one trade up from 18. if one drops to 18 it would be amazing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swampbilly Posted February 7, 2021 Share Posted February 7, 2021 22 hours ago, Phinsesq said: Pitts could drop. I like Williams. but the problem I have with Parker, Williams and Gisecki is that all of them seem injury prone. I want a WR at 3. I wouldn't mind a Harris or Etienne at 18 either or Waddle if he somehow magically drops. This all day!!!! I know 18 is a bit reachy for Harris, but depending on how the draft plays out I wouldn't mind reaching a little for a complete RB with Superstar potential. I like Pitts, but I see him as a "move" TE. If we line Pitts up consistently at WR then he loses what makes him special IMO, and for that reason there's no way I would draft Pitts for a WR spot over Smith or Chase, and probably not Kadarius Toney either. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phinsesq Posted February 7, 2021 Share Posted February 7, 2021 10 minutes ago, Swampbilly said: This all day!!!! I know 18 is a bit reachy for Harris, but depending on how the draft plays out I wouldn't mind reaching a little for a complete RB with Superstar potential. I like Pitts, but I see him as a "move" TE. If we line Pitts up consistently at WR then he loses what makes him special IMO, and for that reason there's no way I would draft Pitts for a WR spot over Smith or Chase, and probably not Kadarius Toney either. Plus I don't want a TE who can't do it all at 3. Pitts strikes me as Gisecki 2.0. Gisecki, good receiver, not much of a blocker at TE position. If we are giving up a #3 pick for a TE I want Kittle, Kelce, Gronk type ability, none of whom were drafted in the first round. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted February 7, 2021 Share Posted February 7, 2021 On 2/5/2021 at 4:37 PM, Tetsujin said: Me too I’m just stating what I think will happen. pls no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.