Apparition Posted October 15, 2017 Author Share Posted October 15, 2017 43 minutes ago, ninjapirate said: Looks like he has the ball and it;'s not moving in anyway to me after he gets it back. Yeah, I don't really see the ball coming out a second time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpanosPayYourRent Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 48 minutes ago, everlong said: Bad call? Maybe, but the Jets don't deserve any sympathy. They forced a 3 and out afterwards and failed to tie the game when they got the ball back. Good teams suck up bad calls and try to overcome them; bad teams like the Jets blame them exclusively. So what you're saying is the best team should get bad calls the whole game so they can try to win that way? Your argument is very weak and honestly made no sense at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpanosPayYourRent Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 The ref should have got his discount double check before making this call, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kip Smithers Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 54 minutes ago, everlong said: Bad call? Maybe, but the Jets don't deserve any sympathy. They forced a 3 and out afterwards and failed to tie the game when they got the ball back. Good teams suck up bad calls and try to overcome them; bad teams like the Jets blame them exclusively. Go away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soko Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Was at the game and thought it was a TD. Dislike the rule even though I’ll take the W. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 1 hour ago, Starless said: Here's Corrente's explanation: Horrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakuvious Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Yeah, it absolutely should've been a TD. Just about everyone who saw it is in agreement on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 I thought that they got hosed on that call. Does it make any difference the rest of the way? Impossible to say, but I thought that it was a bad call. I feel like it would have been slightly more acceptable had it been ruled a fumble / touchback on the field, but it wasn't, right? I have no idea how you see enough on there to overturn the initial call. It's highly debatable at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLF54927 Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Where's the camera angle that backs up Corrente? Or is it non-existent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
everlong Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 31 minutes ago, SpanosPayYourRent said: So what you're saying is the best team should get bad calls the whole game so they can try to win that way? Your argument is very weak and honestly made no sense at all Holy crap, straw man much? I'm saying that bad calls are part of the game and that good teams like NE overcome them and bad teams like the Jets use them as an excuse. As I've said, they forced a 3 and out and were given an opportunity to tie the game and failed. The only reason this is seen as a big deal because it benefited NE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 4 minutes ago, everlong said: The only reason this is seen as a big deal because it benefited NE. No, this is a big deal because it was just a terrible call. This is the 4th thread about a call we've had in the last 4 weeks, not to mention a fifth thread about a ref crew's handling of a specific team. It is the only one that involves the Pats, I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malik Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 4 minutes ago, everlong said: Holy crap, straw man much? I'm saying that bad calls are part of the game and that good teams like NE overcome them and bad teams like the Jets use them as an excuse. As I've said, they forced a 3 and out and were given an opportunity to tie the game and failed. The only reason this is seen as a big deal because it benefited NE. No one is using it as an excuse. People are discussing it. Or is discussion not allowed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
everlong Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, Malik said: No one is using it as an excuse. People are discussing it. Or is discussion not allowed? You can discuss it all you want, but it doesn't hide the fact the Jets had an opportunity to tie the game and ultimately failed to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malik Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 Just now, everlong said: You can discuss it all you want, but it doesn't hide the fact the Jets had an opportunity to tie the game and ultimately failed to do so. Literally no one is arguing that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INbengalfan Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 2 minutes ago, everlong said: You can discuss it all you want, but it doesn't hide the fact the Jets had an opportunity to tie the game and ultimately failed to do so. So having another chance to score makes it okay? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.