El Ramster Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 He isn’t even good as Goff that’s crazy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 1 minute ago, El Ramster said: He isn’t even good as Goff that’s crazy Probably better than Stafford, tho. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Just now, ET80 said: Probably better than Stafford, tho. Making room for Watson? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Just now, El Ramster said: Making room for Watson? I was about to suggest that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 2 hours ago, djw4bucs said: Wow im surprised jerry fell into daks demands. This is a joke right? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkippyX Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 59 minutes ago, Shanedorf said: ...when they realize how many commercials will have to be injected into the broadcast just to pay for these new TV deals. Dak's shiny new contract pays him $43,000 / minute of game time. So in the time it takes you to get up, take a leak, grab another beer and return to the couch... Dak will have earned your annual salary. Is that sustainable ? ...Maybe. Unless too many fans decide that a 3 hour commercial-fest... is a lousy way to consume the NFL. The NFL owners and the Networks are making a massive bet here and Dak's new contract is betting on that bet coming up a winner. The Waltons make about 10k every minute of every hour of every day while paying their employees so little that they lead the nation in food stamps. That's been sustainable for 25+ years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_W Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 would think Dallas is further away from the SB than just 1 'very good QB' as they've had that same QB for 4~yrs just haven't had a lot of success in those years came in hot in 2016, beat the Chiefs in 2017, then... the list of 'good teams beaten' gets really thin wish him the best Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkippyX Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 His cap hit this year is apparently around 22.5 million so that means its about 41.5 per year in years 2-4 and 13 in Drew Brees cap hit in the fake year 5. The Cowboys are just barely over the cap right now by about a million or so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CKSteeler Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Forge said: If that's accurate, that's going to be some crazy back end cap hits. That's 3 years to basically make up 20 million...so that's like some 49-50 million dollar cap hits. He supposedly has a cap hit averaging $42 million over the first three years. With only 4 years, there's not a lot of backloading to be done, I'd suspect. The jump starts next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49erurtaza Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Otc had the contract up already Year Cap Number Dead Money & Cap Savings Cut (pre-June 1)Cut (post-June 1)Trade (pre-June 1)Trade (post-June 1)RestructureExtension Total $160,000,000 2021 $22,200,000 $95,000,000 ($72,800,000) 2022 📝 $33,200,000 $72,800,000 ($39,600,000) 2023 $44,200,000 $39,600,000 $4,600,000 2024 📝 $47,200,000 $26,400,000 $20,800,000 2025 📝 $13,200,000 $13,200,000 $0 2026 $0 $0 $0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49erurtaza Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 (edited) Contract Notes Dak Prescott and the Cowboys agreed to a four year, $160 million contract with $126 million in guarantees on March 8, 2021. Prescott received $95 million fully guaranteed at signing. The full guarantee consists of Prescott's 2021 and 2022 base salaries as well as a $66 million signing bonus. Per Pro Football Talk, the remaining $31 million becomes guaranteed on the 5th day of the 2022 league year. Prescott has a no trade clause and a no tag clause in the contract. There are two void years at the end of the contract for proration purposes. Those two years void two days prior to the start of the 2025 league year. Via OTC Edited March 9, 2021 by 49erurtaza 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showtime Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 1 hour ago, canadaluvsdallas said: Yeah and on what basis would have we signed him on? We only saw his full progression as a QB last year. Hindsight is 20/20 but it doesn't excuse giving blind unwarranted contracts. Keep in mind we didn't throw away all our draft capital while still having our QB1 unlike the Rams. Contracts and assets need to be justified. This is a performance based business. As fans of the NFL overall lets stop pushing this narrative. Huh? Dak had been in the league for three years. He posted a winning record in each of his first three years. He threw for 67 TDs and 25 INTs. You sign him to an extension the same year Goff and Wentz got theirs. If you do it then, you can maybe get him for $25 million per season. You sign him based off what he did for three seasons and what you project him to do as he can get better. Cowboys screwed this up and now are paying this guy $40+ million per season coming off a very serious injury. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showtime Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 28 minutes ago, Ryan_W said: would think Dallas is further away from the SB than just 1 'very good QB' I don't think they're anywhere near a SB. Their defense blows, their RB has regressed, and their offensive line isn't very good/dependable. Obviously they have to sign him because he's a good/really good QB, but SB? They probably make the playoffs next season by default because they play in by far the worst division in the league, but even then, them winning the NFC East is not guaranteed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NVRamsFan Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 2 hours ago, Forge said: pretty sure the signing bonus can only be spread out over 5, right? unless they changed that in the CBA? Yes only 5 years still unless that hasn't been reported as a change. One of the voidable years will have a little of the signing bonus and each of them will have a small base part of the non guaranteed. They renegotiate after 4 years boost those 2 with signing bonus to the new contract and they've got him on another deal after this one. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RavensfanRD Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 I hate you, Dallas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.